advertisement
Click Here
On CBS MoneyWatch: Warning: This Blog Will Harm Your Health
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]Sarah Palin's son, Trig, was one of the "hot topics" on The View today. Barbara Walters read a statistic that 90% of fetuses found to have down syndrome are terminated. Last poll I read said something like the split between pro-life/pro-choice in the US is close to 50/50, so I don't see, mathematically, how it can be that 90% of ds pregnancies are terminated.

    78 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.18.09, 08:20 AM [ Flag ]
    • I think it is probably bc many people are pro-life until they are faced with having to raise a DS child.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Or that pro-choice people have a disproportionate number of DS pregnancies. Maybe it has something to do with age--women who wait to get married and have children in order to build their careers are statistically more likely to be pro-choice. Then they are older when they get pregnant so DS is more likely.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • NP: Just a hunch, but I would guess what you say may be more true for NYC, where many women wait to have children... but for the country as a whole, I would guess more pro-lifers tend to have babies with down syndrome, because many don't believe in birth control and thus continue to have children into their forties. In our Catholic church there were many babies with downs-syndrome (usually the youngest in the family). I imagine that not every woman feels she can handle that at forty with many other children to care for as well (pro-life or not).

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 08:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITA. You don't really know what you believe until you are tested.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:26 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I don't agree entirely. I opted at 40 not to have a cvs or amnio because I knew that whatever I learned wouldn't change anything, I was going to have that baby anyway. Some of us know what we believe on this subject without being tested.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 08:32 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • And others think they do until they're faced with a frightening reality.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 08:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Yes, but as someone pointed out below if you know you won't terminate there's no point in getting the testing done. By opting out of the tests I was making a descision to have my child regardless of the number of chromosones he had.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 08:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Not true. There is a point to getting testing, even if you will not terminate under any circumstances. If you do have a DB that will have a problem, then you have the time/ability to prepare for what's coming. Arranging for necessary specialists, arranging leaves/benefits, preparing older DCs, etc.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.18.09, 10:29 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • And those are the 10% who found out dc had Down's and didn't abort. For many of us, the risk of the procedure causing harm outweigh any benefit of lining up specialists.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.18.09, 10:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • The risk of the procedure varies by doctor. If you don't trust your doctor to properly perform an amnio, find a new doctor.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.18.09, 10:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • Why is it not OK in your book for someone to elect to not have the procedure? You are being very anti-choice.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.18.09, 10:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • yup. I think this is the ans. dead on.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:38 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • It's "anti-abortion," not "pro-life." Let's stop playing into the hands of the Christian Right by using their terminology. I am pro-choice. I am not anti-life.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • OP here - I used old-school terms, sorry. The Christian Right also refer to pro-choice as "pro-abortion," didn't want to offend anyone, just to get some speculation on the numbers.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 08:45 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • or: sorry, didn't mean to call you out. i just hate that we have all adopted these terms without thinking about what they imply. it is my mission in life to reframe the terms to something more accurate that doesn't feed into the crazy christian right agenda.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 08:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • your semantics make no sense. You are "pro-choice", not "anti-life" but those who are "pro-life" are "anti-abortion", you sound like an idiot... be consistent.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 03:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I read an article about pro-life women who have abortions. It happens

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:22 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • well, you don't know howthat 50/50 split is skewed by gender or age. and yes, people who say they are pro-life have abortions.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The great irony is that the traditional "red" states have (1) higher divorce rates, (2) higher # of abortions and (3) higher % of poverty... People don't do what they "believe"--they are better at telling other people what to do...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • do you think those red states have no blue in them? that doesn't really make any statistical sense--

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • residents of red states, on average, tend to be less eductaed, poorer, less white- this contributes to higher rates of all that you suggest above. The education levels and incerased poverty have way more to do with it than the political convictions-

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • i thought poor are more likely to have baby, whereas wealthy are more likely to have abortion?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 08:49 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • actually, lots of poor women have multiple abortions- lack of access to health care and bad choices lead to lack of birth control, so they use abortion as a form of birth control- also teenagers pregnant more in poorer areas (and places where sex education is weak- hello red states!) and they get abortions-

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 08:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • what a tragically black and white way to look at the world. do you teach your child that the people in "red states" are ignorant, right wingers? how sad.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 10:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • red states have higher teen pregnancy rates as well. read "red sex, blue sex," in the new yorker, from a year ago.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 12:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I wonder what the ages of the moms who terminate are vs those who don't. IME its easier to be pro-life, or see any issue in black and while with no shades of grey, when you're young. As we get older, wiser, and have more life experiences to draw from most issues enter the grey area.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I never claimed to know what others could/should do but I always said I would never opt for termination of my child. Then quad screen said 1:4 for Trisomy 18/21 and I did research on what T18/21 is. And I thought about the two kids we already had. And the world got very very gray.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:29 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Wow. This is really interesting. I had a baby not long ago and wondered what I'd have done in that situation. And?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 08:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Sorry, I should not have dropped it there -- I got pulled away. When they hooked up the ultrasound to do the amnio there was no heart beat. Decision averted. Fate's kindness has never hurt so much.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 08:45 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • because a) many people who are pro-life don't have an amnio b/c they know they wouldn't abort no matter what the test shows and b) some people consider themselves pro-life but still make exceptions so in a poll they would answer that they are pro-choice, but what they really mean is that abortion isn't a form of birth control.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:33 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • The pro-lifers I know believe that amnio is unnecessary and dangerous.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:43 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Yes, I think I have heard that some pro-lifers will not have an amnio because they feel it implies that they MIGHT abort.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 09:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I am prolife and I choose not to have an amnio. Not because of what it might imply to anyone. I choose not to because of the potential risk of amnio. I know many prolife people and having an amnio or not is just a matter of what they feel comfortable with. Some people just need to know. Just like some people just need to know the sex of the baby.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 06:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I agree with poster who says pro-lifers probabyl don't ahev an amnio, I'd be curious to really know if the stat is 90% of DS pregnancies, or 90% of pregnancies where the mother tests and finds out the baby has DS- we're talking very different populations here!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I'm pro life and did not have an amino. I did not want to be in the position of having to make an decision. It all worked out and my children are healthy. BTW, most people thought I was crazy for not having test before babies born.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I choose not to have any tests and no one except my dr. has ever asked me anything at all about it. Do people really get into other peoples personal decisions like that?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 06:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Palin's behavior after she went into labor with Trig was so completely bizarre and showed such indifference to the health and well-being of her child that I can't help wondering whether she did not want him to live.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • These studies are flawed in that people who pursue prenatal diagnosis in general are more likely to terminate an affected pregnancy. I am a genetic counselor and work in a population where I would say 80% of patients decided against amniocentesis/CVs, so we have no idea what they would do if they found out a pregnancy was affected. Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome by maternal blood sampling is coming. When the risk from the procedure is taken out, and more people have testing, we may get a better idea of what the true statistic is.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:52 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'm Catholic, would not have terminated a pregnancy and had an amnio. I grew up with a cousin who had Down's, and knew that if there was something wrong with my DB, I'd want to know, so that I could be prepared to manage the situation - line up the right specialists in advance, prepare other family members, arrange DH and my leave/benefits, etc. Just having an amnio doesn't automatically mean anything.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 09:10 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • abortion is one of those issues where how we feel is not how we act when reality hits us in the face. Lots of anti-choice folks will abort when it's their lives that are about to get turned upsidedown with an unwanted pregnancy.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 10:38 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • For some maybe but not for most. If you really believe something, you don't just stop believing it because circumstances change.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 06:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • No, you keep opposing abortion -- while having one when it's your own pregnancy you want to end. Amazing how many anti-choice types lack the courage of their convictions when they (or someone in their family) gets pregnant.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 06:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • we tried 8 years to have my daughter and were told during one of her screenings she had markers for downs. i'm pro-choice, but refused a amnio and refused to abort. i never thought about raising a special needs child, but i knew that she was a miracle and couldn't wait for her arrival regardless. anyway, all went well despite concerns and we delivered a perfectly, beautiful, brilliant and happy baby. so you never know.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 10:49 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I am pro-choice but I knew I would never terminate a Downs baby. I did the nuchal fold testing (both for my twins and my singleton) to get some idea of the risks. When it was normal, I opted not to do CVS or amnio. If the nuchal fold had shown a high risk, I likely would have done more testing just to do as an earlier poster suggested - line up specialists, read up on the challenges etc. etc.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 12:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • bc many people don't think beyond elective abortions in the event of unwanted pregnancies - so they say they are "anti abortion" or "prolife". those same people can feel very differently when faced with the possibility of a db w DS or other serious medical/physical/congenital issues.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 12:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • many people think that being "pro-life" means that they personally would never get an abortion and that being "pro-choice" means that they would. they don't get that it's a political viewpoint: being prolife means that you think that NO WOMAN should be allowed to get an abortion and being prochoice means you think that the choice to terminate or continue a pregnancy should be in the hands of the woman. It's kind of like being anti-poverty does not mean only that you personally don't want to be poor...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 12:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • you are wrong... I am pro-choice for others, pro-life for myself. Quite frankly, if women want to abort their children there is nothing I could do to stop them. Therefore, I believe women should be able to abort their babies, I just would never abort my own.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 03:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • walk a mile in someone else's shoes...

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 05:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • or: that is EXACTLY what I am saying. pro-choice is a political stance meaning that you believe women should ahve the right to choose to terminate OR to keep a pregnancy. Pro-life means that you believe that women should NOT have that right - that the government should make it illegal to terminate a pregnancy. Neither has anything to do with what decision you would make about your own pregnancy.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 12:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I am absolute about this. f there is any chance that baby would be DS or even be slightly mentally retarded, or have any birth defects, I would abort it. No way jose.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 06:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Thank you for letting us know what kind of children you would let live , and the others that you would abort. Again, your decision as a mother.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 11:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • any sort of birth defect? what if it is something like missing a toe? or a cleft lip? would you really abort for any type of birth defect? they are so common and most kids do fine!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 12:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Are most kids heading into kindergarten reading?

    29 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.16.09, 09:09 PM [ Flag ]
    • None of mine were, and it was not a big deal, tt.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 09:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Mine was but he was the only one of his friends, all of whom seem just as bright and started at different stages soon enough after entering. I think it's just like kids learning to walk at different stages, etc. Everyone (with the means and encouragement) learns to read and walk eventually and it doesn't mean anything much exactly when, imo.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 09:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • some do, but they typically run into walls or doors.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 09:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • i don't think so. ds started reading his preK year and that did not seem to be common at all. but now part way through K, there are definitely a lot more.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 10:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • No, they are not, but most leave K reading in public school. I started reading at age 3, but that's not very common (nor does it mean I'm a genuis :-))

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.17.09, 03:43 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • i'm with you. i was verbal/reading early and i'm no genius. in fact, i stink at math. math is far more important in life. everyone in the normal range eventually starts to communicate, but some, like me continue to stink at math.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.17.09, 06:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • not most but a few are. One of mine was and one wasn't. They both read beautifully now.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.17.09, 05:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Not in my dc's K class - but they all came out reading.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.17.09, 05:26 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • About 1/3 of DD's K class came in reading this year. UB "2nd tier".

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.17.09, 06:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • wow. how do you even know that? I have no idea whether other dcs in my dc's class are reading.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.17.09, 06:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Mostly be talking with other parents. DD reads, and a bunch of other parents asked me about it - it seems that she was reading to other DCs. Very small class, info travelled quickly.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 07:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Mine was not and we were told by the teacher 6 weeks in that child should have been sent to school reading - this is at NEST - it was news to us and we have spent the last few months doubling up the reading to catch up. Fortunately, this seems to have worked.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 04:43 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • my dd is at hunter and didn't start reading till 1st grade - not a problem, now in 11th grade & looking at colleges!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 06:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • that is weird. My child didn't read heading into K (Nest) and teacher never said she should be reading before K. Some kids did read but at the end of K my DD was reading as well or better than those kids...

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 07:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • My older daughter didn't read until the middle of first grade (she was 7); she went to Harvard and Harvard Law School! Younger was reading at 4; went to Amherst. Age they start reading is irrelevant.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 04:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • thank you.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 05:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Exactly. General rule is if they're not reading fluently by third grade there's a problem. I'm bothered by the Nest post. You want to create a lifetime love of reading so you don't push it until kid is ready. Neither of my kids were reading at the start of K but by 2nd grade were both reading several grades above.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 05:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • that was us we were po'd but hey that is what we signed the kid up for - there are a dozen other schools we could have chosen; we figured the child is bright better to have him pushed than accomodated.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 06:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • ... and to be fair we hand the child a level c book he reads it asks a couple of words, we ask him what the book is about and he understand - so I guess what they / we are doing works - can't speak to the love part we'll find that out when our son writes a book about his childhood.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 06:43 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • sigh. This is such a mistake though. If there IS a problem, you don't want to wait til 3rd grade. The really important thing is whether they're progressing at a good rate, whether they're decoding -- things that indicate they *will* read w/out a problem. But if there *is* a problem, u want to catch it in 1st grade.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 08:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • ITA. Niece and nephew are dyslexic - she hid it until the end of 2nd grade (very smart DC and remembered everything she heard), now in 7th and still behind, even after years in a special school and a lot of support. Because their parents knew what to look for, her brother was diagnosed at the beginning of 1st, transferred to a special school and should be mainstreamed after 2-3 years.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 08:05 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I think many children go into K with recognition of capital letters. Some children learn sight words and small letters prior to K. Some do read and many do not. There is a tremendous amount of pressure to want our kids to read early.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 05:22 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • not strictly true -- if dc is struggling in 1st grade, you shld pay attention, signed mom of dyslexic dc

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 06:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • kids graduated college and you are still on kids topics? Good for you!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 12:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I hope not, my DS is at C and is not reading...(he is performing DNA experiments though)

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:00 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]DS got 99/95/97 on ERBs -- will that be good enough for TT, comments were good.

    33 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.19.09, 04:52 PM [ Flag ]
    • Yes. Still need to have a good visit, etc.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 04:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • of course it will. and you know that.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 05:02 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • depends on the TT -- which ones?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 05:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • we're applying to dalton, trinity, collegiate, - others not considered tt on this board, SA, Speyer and Ethical

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 06:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • 99 V, 95 P?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 06:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • no 99p, 95v

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 06:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I'm not sure it makes a diff either way, but wanted to see which was P and which V. It's a good score. That said, everything else has to be in place like above posters have said, primarily play date and then school report. (Do you have a top choice yet? Our list is not far different.)

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.19.09, 06:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • We were actually unexpectedly blown away by Speyer. DS can read pretty well and is very motivated and creative. TT is security, but it also starts out pretty slow and not all that jazzy, so we're underwhelmed. If we had lots of choice, which I know we won't Collegiate, SA and Speyer are the top 3.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.19.09, 06:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • What do you mean TT is security? Great you liked Speyer, we haven't looked. Let's talk SA - I expected to love it and really didn't, felt chaotic to me. Pls tell me why you liked it? Don't have a top 3 yet, still seeing a couple more.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.19.09, 06:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • I think TT schools are vastly better at HS and really pretty lame at elementary for a kid that is at all advanced. I know others disagree and I'm not trying to pick a fight. Have close friends at SA and I like their artsy, creative and literary focus for ds. Math and science worry me, but it otherwise seems like a good fit. Perhaps because Speyer is new they give lots of detail about fab curriculum and a very individualized approach to the kids. Also, loved that they do chess and fencing and Singapore Math.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.19.09, 06:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • Thank you for that perspective, on both Speyer and SA. Why not into Dalton? We really liked Collegiate - do you think it too is lame at elementary?

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.19.09, 06:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • np Your kid got a 97 erb and he's "advanced"? Please.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.19.09, 06:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • np: come on, let's not have this fight - erbs don't really measure a kid at this age.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        11.20.09, 05:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • not all kids test well. My neice who is doing math, building elaborate structures,huge vocabulary got a 119 on the SB. Clearly not reflective of her abilities. Some kids don't take a test seriously. Not saying she's gifted but most likely has a higher iq than reflected by the test given at 4 yo

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 06:03 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • But part of giftedness is the skill to sit with an adult for one hr and stay focused and enjoy it and not want to rush. All those things are part of the test, not ancillary to it. Why don't people get that. Doesn't matter that she's doing math, can she answer the questions and take it seriously.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 10:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • the truth is that at 4 these tests are not reliable. At age 7 or so you will get a much more accurate picture.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 11:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • I also said she's not gifted. Probably above average though and 119 sb means iq lower than that

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 11:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • My dc's "picture" at 7 is exactly the same as at 4.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 11:46 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • most aren't - many low scorers are also top performers in school a few years later

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 11:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • MANY? Please. It's like any and every kid who didn't get 98+ "had a bad day" or "doesn't test well". Maybe some just aren't in the top 2%!

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 11:55 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • Yes, It is a fab curriculum. Plus your DC will get much more one-on-one attention than at any other school in the city. Not all kids going into K @ Speyer can read (ours did), but they accommodate each kid at their level and help them find the right books for them. Good luck!

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.20.09, 09:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • OMG you are us except that we have DD so no Collegiate. GL - maybe we'll see you in k next year.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.20.09, 05:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • bilingual?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 05:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • of course- stop rubbing it in

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 06:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]For this year only, what is the highest SB score you've heard of for Hunter admission?

    15 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.19.09, 11:57 AM [ Flag ]
    • stop already. your kid got the highest score ever, okay?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 12:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • It actually doesn't guaranteed your admission even if you got the highest score. Even if your dc got a phenomenal high score, it is no guarantee of brilliance or success. So, get over it and remember that he/she is only 4 years old.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 12:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • yup. and if the parents are assholes, it counts against you. sadly, your continued posts onthis topic seem to indicate that your personality flaws will harm your child's chances.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 12:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • ita. hunter parents secretly roll their eyes when faced with a braggy parent. our kids are all geniuses--we don't care if your kid got 1,789,000 on the SB.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 12:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • NP: Look, she's not bragging. She's asking for a poll to see how the numbers might shake out this year (compared to last). Guess nobody wants to play.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 12:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • maybe because those kinds of polls are mind-numbingly boring?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.19.09, 12:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • OP here: Thank You! Not bragging at all, just curious what scores are like this year since everyone thinks that that the cut off goes up every year. FWIW my DS got a 140 and I am happy with it but I wanted to know what others had gotten. Everyone is so evil and assumes the worst of everyone on UB!

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.19.09, 01:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I know, this a particularly bad showing. Wonder if you touched a nerve or what? I do think as we get closer to Dec 21 more people might be interested.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.19.09, 01:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Come on, she's just trying for a poll. No worse than the endless Noa, Aiden, and Jaxon baby name polls.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 12:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • OP, no one wants to play. Guess we'll all see in Dec. Maybe closer to then, people will want to get a pulse. I don't blame you for trying (and understand this wasn't a boasting exercise).

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 12:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I love how the board feels quiet like no one's here, and then someone says something that pisses people off and POW there's dozens waiting in the wings to strike. Ahh, the joys of UB.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 12:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I think the problem is that there are at least 5 similar topics (same number of words and all) :)

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 11:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]

Your settings system defaults

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

UrbanBaby Asks...

Are you or your partner ever naked in front of your children?

Already voted? View Results

See previous polls »