advertisement
Click Here
On mySimon: X-Ray: See Through the World Around You
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]Children's Aid Society preschool: How's the separation process for the 3's program? On our tour, it seemed a little short/brief. Other schools seemed more open to the idea that it can take a few weeks, maybe longer for some kids.

    8 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.17.09, 08:42 PM [ Flag ]
    • It is pretty efficient. The class is divided into two groups who attend two different shorter sessions during regular class time along with their parent/ caregiver. I think that this lasted about a week. Slowly the class entire class is integrated into their regular time - and parents start leaving their children. Some schools do this process slower, but it worked very well for most children we knew. My dc was quick to separate and we actually found that my being there was a hindrance to her. If anything, I was sad because I really wasn’t missed! In her 2's class there was a child who did have a difficult time, and the mom was able to stay after drop for a longer period of time.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 09:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • if your dc needs a few weeks, maybe longer, to separate, he is not ready for preschool.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • IMO, a drawn out separation is actually worse (unless the kid is having a particularly hard time with separation). You'll be very surprised at how well it goes. the clingiest kid i know separated in a week without a single issue, and I thought separation was going to be a disaster of traumatic proportions for all involved.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • op: I actually think my kid will be fine and a quick separator. But I like the idea that the staff are supportive if it takes a little longer (calms my nerves going in, you know?).

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 08:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • the first week parents are encouraged to drop off but are allowed to stay in the classroom until dc is settled. by the second week, while parents are still allowed to stay, they should be trying to transition dc into being dropped off. by the third week, all parents are expected to drop off. (obviously they are allowed to enter the classroom to say brief good-byes, but that's it.) weeks of having parents lingering in the classroom is just too disruptive.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Parents can sometimes be the cause of a problem. DC is fine once mom is out of sight, but mom doesn't believe the teacher and lingers, so the problem lingers, too.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 08:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Schools that carefully select the most able students SHOULD have the greatest success in placing their grads at the most selective schools, a few years down the road. This does not mean that those schools are better at educating their students. And it does not mean that your DC will be desireable to these colleges, if only you could get DC into a TT school.

    22 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.20.09, 03:13 PM [ Flag ]
    • Um.....point?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 03:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Its not obvious that I think that many UBers stress TT acceptance because they erroneously think that attending TT will lead to HYP or therabouts?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 03:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • ramble, much?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 03:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • But they would probably teach dc to spell "desirable". Spelling aside you are wrong. HYP don't take students from TT NYC private for any other reason than they are better educated than the majority. Period.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 03:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I totally understand what you're saying, and I do agree with your point - the reason so many dc's from TT schools get into Ivy is b/c the TT schools screen for the qualities those colleges are looking for, esp. when they look at high schools (and as much as they can in earlier grades, which admittedly is pretty much a crapshoot). However, I will also say in the schools' defense, they do provide a great education too; it's just that it's not the education that gets them into college. And fwiw, I think most NYC schools that I have seen provide a fantastic education.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 03:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • The headmaster of Calhoun is very charismatic and I think impressive. When we went on a tour, he was talking about a student that they had who was brilliant. His point was that The kid would have gone to MIT or Harvard no matter where he went to school but at Calhoun, they were able to get him interested in other activities that he may not have found at other schools bc they exposed students to so much. I thought it was nice that he framed it that way - whether it was true or not.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 03:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I find this whole debate today ridiculous. I went to HYP from rural, undesirable public (and I've seen others post this on here too). The students from the tt schools throughout the US did not have any persistent edge. Yes, it took us a semester or two to catch up in terms of study habits and learning what the graders wanted for essays, assignments, and tests. But after the brief catch up period, the students were not distinguishable by K-12 schooling in terms of achievement, class standing, or general well-roundedness in conversation. If you want to pay for a tt K-12 education, go for it and be content with your choice. But stop trying to defend it (to yourself, I assume, because most of don't care) as and inherently better lifelong educat...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 03:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Quite similar to: "I am not impressed by the Ivy League establishments. Of course they graduate the best - it's all they'll take, leaving to others the problem of educating the country. They will give you an education the way the banks will give you money - provided you can prove to their satisfaction that you don't need it." (Peter DeVries)

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 04:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Let's flip this though, and look at schools like brooklyn Friends that place a very small number into HYP. Maybe I misread (their college placement on their website), but it looks like they placed only ONE student in HYP in the last FIVE YEARS. I know children there with highly intelligent, educated parents (who attended HYP or Stanford), and WHY is it so VERY few of the children of these parents are getting into HYP from Brooklyn Friends? Having met some of these children, I think the children too are highly intelligent and have tremendous potential. So then, what is happening? I don't believe ALL the brilliant kids are leaving (although a good number do leave for schools like Stuy or other sought after public or private high schools). Cre...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 04:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • btw, Berkeley Carroll seems to have much more success placing significant numbers of grads into HYP, as apparently does Packer, and Saint Ann's of course does very well (as everyone knows)

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 04:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • surely some people will flame and say we should forget HYP as a measure of success, and maybe we should, but one can still wonder and ask why there is this disparity in placement records among the various private schools in NYC, all of whom charge in the ballpark of 30K per year per student

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 05:02 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • And the answer suggested here is that, in large part, those schools regarded as top get their pick of the most able kids... who then become more sought after in college admissions process.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 07:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I don't think Quaker schools in general send many kids to HYP.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 07:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • but really, if you can count on one hand the number admitted over FIVE YEARS, that tells you it is RARE, and it makes me wonder why? I think even BWL gets more into HYP.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 08:38 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • how about Sidwell Friends? Anyone know? Chelsea certainly did well (Stanford, no?)

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 08:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • not true that Quaker schools don't do well, at least in the case of Sidwell Friends, it appeared ahead of Dalton and HM in a WSJ article (from 2007 I believe) on placement of students into top colleges

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 08:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]do interracial couples get divorced?

    76 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.19.09, 12:58 PM [ Flag ]
    • no, never.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 12:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I'm not even sure that it is legal for them to do so. I know there is a Supreme Court case that held they have a right to get married, but it didn't discuss divorce. Hmm.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 01:01 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I have to research the case law in this... hmmm...

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 01:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • No need to research. Take my word for it -- it is odd, but true.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 01:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • i didn't ask can they, but do they. i don't think so. i think their unions are stronger and thus last forever.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.19.09, 01:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • np: are you serious? you realize that they are human, right? and what about all of the interracial couples that never get married, but have a kid and then break up? what about their unions?

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.19.09, 01:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • As half of a deliriously happy married interracial couple, I say: WTF??

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.19.09, 01:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • do you know any interracial previously married couples that divorced?

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.19.09, 01:18 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • np: i do. there goes your theory!

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.19.09, 01:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • np: you realize this is a statistics thing, right? the number of interracial couples you know is probably way smaller than the number of same-race couples you know. so even if they have the same rate of divorce, you will know many fewer divorced interracial couples.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.19.09, 01:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • I know two couples that divorced, and one of them were interracial. God you'e so weird... and patronizing... and a little racist.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.19.09, 01:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • i'm trying to picture who OP is.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.19.09, 01:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • racist against whom? how can you say that?

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.19.09, 01:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • np: when you assume something of people, based on their race, it is racist. even when the stereotype is positive, it is racist. they are people, they are not defined by their race. interracial couples are human, with human flaws, just like any other sort of couple!

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        11.19.09, 01:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • Because it assumes that interracial couples are "special" somehow. Like they're not like any other couple. Just because it's not a negative per se, doesn't mean it's not racist, since you're still making judgements and assumptions based on race.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        11.19.09, 01:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • it's not based on race, it's more based on circumstance or situation.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.19.09, 01:51 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • The situation based on race, yes.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.19.09, 01:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • I think OP's question is idiotic but the people responding that it's racist to make assumptions of people based on just their race: how do you feel about affirmative action? Same assumption principles, isn't it?

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.19.09, 08:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • I'm one of the posters (in an interracial marriage) who called the post racist. Yes, I feel that affirmative action is racist, too.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 06:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Thank you. That is awesome that you are so consistent. Few are.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.20.09, 10:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • And what makes their union stronger?

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.19.09, 01:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • i think because of what they will face they consider marriage much more closely and have a stronger bond.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.19.09, 01:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • "What they will face"??? Come on, DH and I laugh at the minor things that do occasionally happen. Are you in the Deep South or something?

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.19.09, 01:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • I think that's crap. I don't think interracial couples consider marriage more closely or have a stronger bond. My friend's divorce just became final. She was in an interracial marriage. I am too, my marriage is fine.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.19.09, 07:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Umm - my BIL and former SIL were an interracial couple, and they got divorced.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.19.09, 01:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Yes, left quite a pickle.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 01:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • what about same-sex interracial couples, though? an even bigger conundrum.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 01:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I thought there was jurisprudence on them not being allowed to have children?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 10:22 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • what?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 01:01 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Never. Ever. The sex is always so hot.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 01:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • according to a judge in louisiana, almost every time

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 01:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • the responses to this post are hilarious. OP why in the world did you ask such dumb question?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 06:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • in all seriousness, the rate of divorce for interracial couples is actually lower than for couples of the same race.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 06:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ^^ I'm in an interracial marriage, and I know that for us and for other couples I know, one thing that happens is that when you're dating because you're interrcial you just communicate on a different level and you take your relationship more seriously because you have to deal with some external and internal stuff that others don't necessarily have to deal with.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 06:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • many couples who are not in a biracial relationship take those relationships seriously.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 06:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Do you seriously believe this? OK, I'm in an interracial marriage for the last 13 years and I can honestly say before we got married we didn't have any conversations about it. We just saw each other for who we are. It wasn't any big discussion with our families either. They both could care less what race we are, as long as we're happy. Now this might how something to do with the fact that both my husband and I had dated people of many different races before we got married so race was no thing to us.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 06:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • ok well that's your experience but I assure you it's not the experience of most.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 06:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • NP: I assure you it is. Another interracial gal here, together 12 years. Never talked about it. We love each other for who we are.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.19.09, 06:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • NP: Yet ANOTHER interracial wife of 7 yrs. Have never had to explicitly talk about it, and our respective families couldn't care less either. This ain't Georgia circa 1954.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 12:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • You don't sound like you're in an interracial relationship at all. I think you're just trying to stir the pot. A rare consensus on UB! The only poster who seems to think it makes a difference is you.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 06:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • what internal stuff would you have to deal with? A person is a person. Why would you have to communicate on a different level?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 06:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • you're nuts

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 07:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Please, post a link to the evidence.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 10:22 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I knew it!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 12:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • What a bizarre question. We are an interracial couple and we fight like nobody's business.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 06:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • My friend in the product of an interracial couple and her husband is %100 AA. Even though she is not that smart they seem to have a good family life. They do live in east Harlem though and he wants to move to Jersey!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 07:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • You win the award for nonsensical answer to nonsensical post.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 07:51 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • It was an inside joke on a public forum. This entire thread is the most ridiculous one that has ever been on here.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 07:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • And that's really saying something. Although, I have to say, every time I see mass censensus on UB I assume FAKE.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 06:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'll bite. I am not in an inter-racial marriage perse, but in an inter-cultural marriage. I think for those that date and marry outside of their and their family's comfort zones, you have to really love the person to deal with all the surrounding noise. My wife was told that our marriage would never last because we aren't the same religion, and both my mother and grandmother flat out told me I shouldn't marry my wife. We are now in our 6th year of marriage with 2 lovely children

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 08:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • We are in our mid-30s and many of our friends/family/acquaintances are getting divorced. I guess the point is that a lot of people who marry others from very similar backgrounds may be doing so just to please family or take the easy road. Dating someone of another ethnicity/background/race takes a lot of guts, and marrying them even more so.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 08:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Ivies+Duke+Chicago+MIT+Stanford+Amherst+Williams+Caltech (20005-09): Brearley 53%, Horace MAnn 48%, Trinity 47%, Spence 45%, Chapin 41%, Dalton 39%

    98 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.20.09, 08:36 AM [ Flag ]
    • did you pick out the schools that B sent the most dcs to? please stop already. caltech? isn't that a (gasp) PUBLIC school?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 08:38 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np: FWIW I am the poster you slammed below for being some Crazy B mom, I did not post this.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 08:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Caltech is probably one of the toughest ones to get in and it is sort of like MIT

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 08:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • of course. but it is not small, ss, private, elitist, or any of the many reasons B moms give for B's alleged superiority.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 08:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • You people really have a bug up your a$$ about this school what it the problem here?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 08:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I would have added Cooper Union. Nobody from Brearly went there. It's extremely competitive bec it's free and their engineering is top notch. Probably smarter kids apply there than MIT or Caltech.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 08:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • That is sort of a random and unqualified comment don't you think?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 08:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • That smarter kids apply to Cooper Union over MIT/Cal Tech is not really relevant. CU only offers 3 programs and one is in fine arts. I would say that the smartest boys in the nation apply to Deep Springs College most of all.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 09:32 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • ^^^So let's look at the average SATs for CU vs MIT vs Cal Tech anyway. Cooper Union is 710M, 665V (1375) - 9.26% applicants accepted; MIT is 760M, 710V (1470) - 11.86% accepted; Cal Tech is 785M, 730V (1515) - 17.36% accepted.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 09:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • FWIW, I know a B girl who transferred to CU.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 09:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • outing myself, I went to Spence and Cooper Union! I also got into Caltech and MIT, but Cooper is free.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 01:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • ^^I'm actually not sure what this thread is about, but I never see Cooper discussed so I had to jump in.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.20.09, 01:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Shows what you know. You look super smart. Hahahhaa, not.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 01:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • You don't know anything about Caltech, do you? It's private and smaller than almost all of the Ivies.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 09:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • are you insane? Caltech is a smaller MIT. Just as many oddball students as MIT. It's private and just as difficult to get into.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 11:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • More difficult--but since it's here on the West Coast all the wannabes on the East Coast either dismiss it or have never heard of it.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 01:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • i'd heard of it and knew it was a good engineering school, but thought it was public like Va Tech. in any event, I do have a hard time believing it's the top choice of any ss tt type.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 01:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Cal Tech is not public - it's a private university

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 09:27 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • caltech is a wonderful private famous engineering school. how do you not know that?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 11:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Cal Tech is not only private, but back in the early 90s when I was applying to college, the average math SAT score there was a perfect 800. I joked that there was no way they were ever going to accept people w anything less, no matter how good their app, bc they were not going to give up that perfect number!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 11:49 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The problem is that if you go to one of these private schools, or even some top notch public schools in 'burbs, you are often "brokered" much like preschools do. You may love Harvard, but if the school decides some other kids are going to be the kids they recommend for Harvard, your chances of getting in are much lower. It's fine if you are the chosen one for the school you love, but if not, you are better off being one of the top students at a no-name public school and applying to that school.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 08:45 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • This is just not the case. You are never better off at a no name public school in the burbs. We are talking about a 50% 'rate of return' on excellent schools for only 50 dcs. That is 25 every year in the top schools. The other 25 also go to top schools with an exception of one or two, schools that would make any no name public drool. And that is not even beginning to discuss the comparison in the education itself

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 08:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • but it's apparently worthy to graduate B and go to a HUGE PUBLIC UNIVERSITY in California. um, ok.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 08:49 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Ok, your comment does not address the points in my post, plus you have no idea how many dcs went to Caltech or why. For your piece of mind, it is always worth while to get an education at any of those school instead of any public school.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 08:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • to poster above: maybe if you went to public school, you would know it is peace of mind. lol.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 08:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Um. Caltech is a TINY PRIVATE university. It has half the number of undergrads as Amherst.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 09:08 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I would choose MIT, Stanford but the other schools are random. I could have chosen different schools to judge. Clearly, B mom put together a list that puts them first. And how she did not include Collegiate is telling. Trinity did not even publish 05-09 stat, so I don't know where she got that number from.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 08:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Sure it is the case. If all you care about is getting into "any" highly ranked college, and you need extra help to achieve that, then a private school is for you. However, unless you are one of Brearley's "chosen" Harvard applicants that year, you probably won't get in. If you are the top student at a no-name school, you have a far better chance of getting into Harvard, and frankly, can easily get into one of the other top schools you list if you are a top student.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 08:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • If all you care about is college admissions and judge a school by that alone than I fear for your DC. The difference a top education makes is immeasurable. Beyond that, you would never convince anyone here that a no name public with 500 students has numbers like any of those listed above. They just don't. Why fight it.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 08:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • but they might know how to use colloquialisms appropriately. like peace of mind.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 08:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • and i would also add that df from no name public tutored C grad at her Ivy. This despite the fact they were in class together.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 09:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • LOL -- I think YOU are the one judging a school on college admissions! I'm just pointing out that I'd far prefer my extremely smart dc to apply and attend the school of her choice than to be "told" which school she can apply to because the private school decides which kids should go to which colleges. Of course a no name public with 500 students doesn't have those stats because 490 of them don't even apply! But if you are one of the 10 students who do aspire to those schools, you get a great chance to go to the school YOU want, not the one that helps the private school have good exmission stats! That's what I want for my dc -- don't you?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 09:10 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • omg, a sane mom.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 09:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • In your anger you failed to address the first part of my post which was pointing out that education, rather than admissions stats, makes a school. That, rather than a perceived shot of HYP by their mother, is what I want for DC. So clearly you would prefer - in your belief that public allows you to go to better schools more easily - that your dc suffer from a poor education so that they can struggle at Harvard rather than a great education and excel at U of C.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 09:29 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • LOL -- do you think if you call me "angry" enough I'll actually get angry? Because I won't! I just laugh! This post is about admissions stats. I've posted my own opinion on a "better education" elsewhere, but I'll say it again. My sibs and I went from a no-name public to those schools listed above and graduated summa and magna cum laude. Surprise! The top achievers at all those schools are as likely to be from public schools as privates.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.20.09, 09:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • ^^^and the only conclusion I can make if you keep insisting that the education at a private school is far superior is that the kids from private schools are far more stupid to begin with! Because if education was indeed "superior", then smart kid + 13 years "tt" education should easily surpass smart kid + 13 years "poor" education when they get to college, right?

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.20.09, 09:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • NP. I thought everyone knew that at top colleges, the private school kids do well first two years. Then the public school kids catch up and blow them away.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.20.09, 11:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • i have posted this question before and i'll post it again. if nyc privates are so superior to publics and privates anywhere else, why oh why, pray tell, is there not ONE SINGLE NOBEL PRIZE WINNER from any of these schools for the last 100 years? please, someone, anyone, answer!

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.20.09, 09:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Crazy B moms are active again. INteresting choice of schools.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 08:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Hey, you left out the B mom who was all upset that dd ended up at SUNY when neighbor's Stuy dc went to Dartmouth.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 09:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Where was that post? b mother here and I would say that sounds like someone posing as a b mother to get a reaction

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 09:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • no, no, it was a serious post from last spring. no one was snarky, people were really supportive, and saying that whatever school it was (i can't remember) is actually strong in the arts. i think she said she felt embarrassed to have spent so much $$$ when neighbor didn't. but people responded like, well, dd got a great education for K-12, and she'll always have that. but if you're at B (I am guessing you are at the lower school), you have to know that in addition to substantial turnover at MS/HS, many dcs just don't go to great colleges.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 09:29 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Why are these the only impressive schools in your mind?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 09:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Golly, you don't supposed the kids who attend these schools have a leg up in terms of wealth, privledge, education, vested parents, etc etc, do you?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 09:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • They probably have a leg up over you in spelling. What's your point? This is not comparing

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 09:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • ^^ private vs. public.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 09:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • actually, not even. see "piece of mind," above.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 09:43 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • You know the % of the Bushes that went to Yale? What a special family!! Must be all very smart.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 09:46 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Not a Republican, didn't vote for any of them, but last time I checked, they were Presidents and Senators. Who are you?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 09:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Not sure what your point is. Mine is that posting these stats are meaningless, because the Bushes didn't go to Yale or became Senators because of their own merits, but because they have had several legs up in their lives. The kids who attend these private schools have several legs up, too, so posting what their "exmissions" are does not mean the schools are magical places that churn out Ivy grads.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 09:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • but first they went to yale and harvard! and they got in without graduating from C! bc they got in on the name, not the brain. and there are others like this (well, maybe not this extreme) who come out of C/B/etc. every year.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 09:52 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • of GHWBush's 4(?) kids, only Dubya went to Yale. Because after admiting him, Yale decided it could do better than take the bottom-quarter of an Andover graduating class. Bush's 3 other kids did not go Ivy. True story.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.20.09, 12:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I just looked the six of them up. Other than GWB, none of them went to great schools. UVa, BC, Tulane, and UofT/Austin. (The first Bush daughter passed away at 4 yo.) Dubya's girls are 50-50 Ivy.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.20.09, 06:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I, for one, would like to than you for collecting and posting the numbers. Haven't read a word of the nonsense in between, but I find your post very helpful - are you the one who offered to do this last night? Thx!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 10:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Did Collegiate do better? Guessing so.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 02:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I think schools with similar sized graduating classes should be compared with each other; i.e., Brearley with Spence, Chapin, NBS, Collegiate, etc and in another group, HM with Trinity, Dalton, etc. It doesn't seem fair if a school gets 5 kids into Harvard, say, and have it total to 10% of their class whereas another school needs to get 20 kids into Harvard for it to count as 10%.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 02:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Saint Ann's doesn't publish, or do they? Anyone know their recent numbers?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 02:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Where did you get these percentages from? I just calculated Brearley and I came up with 45% - not 53% - attending the same schools during those years. It's kind of nitpicky and yet it makes me not believe any of your numbers.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 03:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • You are right. 44.8%. She's cooking her numbers. Her numbers for other schools are lower than they should be.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 08:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • wow. all of you are crazy. so am i for sitting here reading this.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 05:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Can anyone recommend a great obgyn downtown?

    10 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.20.09, 05:26 AM [ Flag ]
    • What hospital?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 06:10 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • St Vincent or NYU

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 08:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I've been very happy with Downtown Women OBGYN (NYU) - I saw Dr. Shih for gyno for a few years and then you rotate through all of the OB docs and we've liked them all so far. We still have 3 months until delivery, so I can't speak to how that goes yet.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 08:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • jacqueline worth - st vincent's.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 06:26 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITD - disliked her so much I switched OBs

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.20.09, 12:09 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • why was she so bad?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.20.09, 12:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • i found her dismissive, distracted and kind of a phoney bitch!. she asked me every visit if I "did fertility treatments" (i'm 37), even though I told her each time, no this was an unplanned pregnancy. I didn't want ultrasounds on every visit, but when i asked ways to see if the pregnancy was progressing (like monitoring hgc, etc) she snapped at me and said "if you're worried, get the ultrasound, if you don't want it, just be happy". my blood pressure was in the 70/50 range all during the 1st tri and she said "my patients don't have problems with their blood pressure" ??? the best was each appointment she came in with a phoney smile and said "i'm glad you're here"

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 01:01 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • ^^ also - it's like night and day with the new ob so i don't think i was being overly critical with worth... maybe she was having a tough time coincidentally when i was seeing her but it just wasn't worth trying it again.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.20.09, 01:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Dr Catherine Goodstein at downtown womens in Soho.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.20.09, 08:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]

Your settings system defaults

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

UrbanBaby Asks...

Are you or your partner ever naked in front of your children?

Already voted? View Results

See previous polls »