advertisement
Click Here
On GameFAQs: Xbox 360: Better vertical or horizontal?
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]Question about financial aid. Our HHI is $90k so I figure we'll qualify for financial aid if we get into a good school (we are on the UES). Does anyone have good insight on how FA works within these schools. Does $90k usually qualify and about how much are they covering. There is no way we can afford several of the places I plan to attempt applying to unless we do get FA. Am I wasting my time?

    35 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    08.21.09, 08:08 PM [ Flag ]
    • most of the schools use an outside service to assess a family's need for FA. I am sure you can find forms online, and figure out whether or not you qualify for anything. You usually have to be very compelling in some way to get any aid.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.21.09, 08:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Rule of thumb is that you'd be expected to pay about 10% of your gross income in tuition. This depends on family size, housing costs, and assets, of course.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.21.09, 08:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np: this is what I have found also. the form asks everything imaginable including if you own a yacht or country club membership! I'm sure they factor everything in. I have always thought 10% of gross is pretty high to contribute actually.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.21.09, 08:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Yeah, 10% is a lot but a lot better then 100%. Man, educating your child in NY is a hell of a lot a money.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.21.09, 09:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np You sound INCREDIBLY entitled. "I have always though 10% of gross is pretty high to contribute actually". They need to ask these questions as there are plenty of high asset/lower income spongers out there.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.21.09, 09:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • which part is entitled? I think they absolutely should ask about all assets and expenditures. it's like detective work and they need to weed out those trying to milk the sytem. I still think 10% of gross is a lot to ask of a family. For someone making 90K that would be about $63K net. So $9K to contribute would be 15% of their take home. Just seems like a lot to me.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.21.09, 09:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Huh? There are public schools if you want to pay nothing. Beyond that, if you think 10% is too much on 90k, have you ever considered that people with hhis of 200k generally pay 35k with one kid? Little bit more than 10%. I feel the worst for them (and I'm not one of them).

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.21.09, 09:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I have considered that and I feel bad for the UMC who get screwed too. I can feel both groups get a raw deal, can't I? Yes, there are public schools but sometimes families can't afford to live in decent zones. Not sure why you are upset that I wish more people had affordable access to quality education.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                08.21.09, 09:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • Because the schools are PRIVATE institutions and aren't obligated to dole out money. Also, you should be paying something if others in your kid's class are paying 35k--the education isn't free and there's a gap even when you pay full tuition.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  08.21.09, 09:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • I agree that schools aren't obligated. I never said they were. I think it's a kindness on their part to offer FA and have greatly appreciated receiving it myself in college. Again, I pay full tuition for my dc but can still have empathy for those who have less options.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    08.21.09, 09:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • Fewer. And I think it's silly to say 10% is a lot to ask. Also, if a family is TRULY poor, full aid is occasionally offered--but the school obviously really, really wants the dc if they're prepared to do that.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      08.21.09, 09:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • I'm sure grammar corrections make you feel better about yourself, but all it does is make me feel sorry for you and undermine any other point you are trying to make. You have done everything possible to turn a basic discussion about % of FA contributions into a personal attack and you've succeeded in derailing the rational discussion - happy now?

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        08.21.09, 09:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • The distinction between fewer and less is pretty basic. Bottom line: Parents should have to pay some part of an independent school education. If everyone on FA was paying less than 10% of their hhi, everyone else would be paying 45k. And given the rate at which tuition increases, that's just not right.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          08.21.09, 10:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • np: In my experience, people who harp on grammar are usually those who have nothing to add to the discussion. You are the type of person who would correct Stephen Hawking's grammar while he's trying to explain the theory of expansion.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          08.22.09, 09:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • nnp: the distinction btw fewer and less is pretty basic, but in the example above the distinction is unclear. nothing worse than someone condescendingly correcting grammer and getting it wrong! fewer is for a countable thing. in the example above, "options" is not necessarily countable. there are an infinite number of options for schooling choices. one could presumably move anywhere and enroll in any school there. it's possible "options" is countable for some people, but it is not inherently so.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          08.22.09, 10:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Money for financial aid comes from a different source than the pool of tuition money.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          08.23.09, 06:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • You wrote, "If everyone on FA was paying less than 10% of their hhi..." I call GOTCHA on the grammar corrector! "If everyone on FA was paying less then 10% of HIS hhi..." This is basic.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          08.23.09, 08:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • I would say "fewer options." Options are countable. The question of the post is about financial aid.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          08.23.09, 09:03 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • http://job.erufa.com/flalotte27/xexat.html http://aws.byethost10.com/jasminef8b/kimertthir.html http://gta.erufa.com/robertpa07/index.html http://saw.ash8.com/runthistea/necan.html

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    08.21.09, 11:18 PM [ Flagged | link to this post ]
        • LOL. You think private school should be free? Really?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.21.09, 09:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • At schools with large endowments like some of the top boarding schools, children from families w HHI of <$65-75K get a full ride (inc books, transportation, etc.) I'm pretty sure the expected contribution of those families just above that range doesn't jump to 10%. Unfortunately, the resources of schools in NYC are not as great.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.21.09, 10:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • np--Lower income families (under 75K) pay far less than 10% of income towards tuition at my dc's NYC school.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.22.09, 02:26 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Not Dalton. Dalton won't let you pay $9k if your HHI is only $90k. You can expect, if your dc gets in which is the tough part, to get most of your tuition discounted at your HHI.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.22.09, 07:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Definitely apply to the schools and apply for FA of course. But also look into all your public school options.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.21.09, 08:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I am on UES with an income slightly less than yours (single parent). My dc is currently in preschool and I receive FA in the amount of 80% of tuition.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.21.09, 08:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • 90K definitely qualifies for aid, but it is harder for a child to be accepted needing aid. You want to be a strong candidate for the particular school (meaning you're less likely to receive aid from a stretch school). Apply widely. Some schools are pretty clear about aid awards, so read websites carefully.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 02:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Do both you and your DH work? If not, a second income gets factored into your FA equation.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 08:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • We make 150K with 2 kids and get about half aid at a tt.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 10:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Has anyone ever heard of an UES public school giving a variance so that a child with a late birthday can start kindergarten a year later? If so, do you know which school and the factors involved? Thank you.

    20 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    08.21.09, 12:01 PM [ Flag ]
    • I have had so many friends fight this fight only to lose in the end. I didn't bother and my November ds has done fine and is looking forward to 3rd grade.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.21.09, 12:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • i think if it's really important to you to hold him back, try to find an alternative for K - like K at a preschool or a parochial school. He can do K there when he is 5.9 yo and then the following year, he can go into 1st grade at public. they can make him skip K, but not 1st.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.21.09, 01:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I don't know of anyone who has been successful since the DOE took over admissions and made it not a school by school decision. But, I would suggest you consider repeating K if need me. Don't be afraid of the stigma. DC is young and it isn't as bad as you think and you will thank your lucky stars again when middle school rolls around.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.21.09, 01:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • This is bullshit, DOE did not take over admissions for regular gen ed. You can't really do it for G&T but for gen ed it is absolutely still done.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.21.09, 04:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • This is correct. It varies from school to school. I know one Dec kid who was sent back to preschool after starting K.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.21.09, 04:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • NP You are incorrect. The DOE did centralize admissions for general ed K. Everything goes thru them now. I'd also stop the profanity -espeically when you are wrong.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 08:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • No they did not! They planned to at one point, but abandoned the plan due to budget cuts. They can barely handle the centralized preK applications so this is a good thing.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.23.09, 08:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • ITA. Not on the UES but done at our local public all the time. There is a lot of misiformation out there. Meet with the principal or assistant principal of the school.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 07:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Exactly, I hate the fact that this board claims it is not done and yet you get to K and will see there are almost always kids that start a year later (talking gen ed here). Definitely worth trying if your dc really needs it.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.23.09, 08:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • There is no variance, the principal can grant exception and let dc enter K. Some D2 schools still do it readily (I know PS183 does this as friend's dc is there) as does our good UWS school. Just suck up and come with a sob story to the principal.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.21.09, 04:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Some principals are totally rigid -- 234 makes no exceptions.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.21.09, 04:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OP: Thanks for all of the helpful posts. We are zoned for 183 so you have given me hope. Do you have any idea what type of sob story works?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.21.09, 05:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Something to demonstrate that dc is immature such like attention/focus problems, and recommendation from your preschool/daycare director.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 05:52 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Sob story? How about the truth? If there isn't a valid reason to hold dc back, what is this whole exercise about?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 07:22 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • letter from your PSD explaining why your child isn't socially mature enough for K

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 08:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • You're in luck. Every year there are a few children in K at 183 who should have started the year before. From what I understand, they won't make the decision until close to the end of the school year. I believe that the principal meets with the parents, but may have one one of the learning specialists evaluate the DC.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 07:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Is DS ready or not? I'm holding back but I was advised by preschool teacher and than even at PS evaluation it was discussed by dept. heads. Later talked to school and worked it out for him to go in 2010.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 07:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • OP: DS is not ready. Would definitely not go through this if I thought it was even a close call. I know the PS agrees. Do you really need to wait to the end of the year? It sounds like you were able to get a decision in advance. My concern with waiting until the end of the year is that DS will have missed kindergarten and we are not willing to skip kindergarten and go to first grade - it would be too difficult for DS in many ways. We cant do private. So this issue decides whether or not we can stay in NYC.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.23.09, 07:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • You should talk to the principal the year dc is supposed to enter K and get agreement on postponement ideally.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.23.09, 08:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]ADVICE NEEDED ON NANNY PAY - I live in the UWS & have found an amazing nanny. She's very warm, fluent in Spanish, has her papers, & is great with kids. She's in her young 30s, & is not one of those burned out nannies you see in the park who don't pay attention to the kids at all. She will also do housekeeping, ironing, etc. & a lot of our cooking (she's an amazing cook). She charges $120/day (for 8:30-5:30). Do you think this is reasonable? Any advice is welcome. Thanks!

    28 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    08.12.09, 07:11 AM [ Flag ]
    • Are you hiring her FT or PT? How old are your kids?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 07:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • very fair.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 07:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • This seems insanely cheap for a nanny + cook + maid. Will you be home to help share the childcare while she's doing all that other work for you? I think you need to pay her a lot more...esp if you have more than one kid.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 07:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • How many DCs? I find it a little bizarre that she charges by the day (rather than a weekly salary), but $13 seems about par.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 07:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • That sounds great- if you don't hire her I will :) (I need someone this fall) -

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 07:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I paid $400/week to a bright college student. She was five times as good as the lazy, brain-dead nannies who sit on their kiester all day speaking patois to their friends on the phone. If you think you get better care by paying more you're terribly mistaken. You want someone who absolutely loves children and doesn't need to send 1/3rd of her paycheck back to the old country; someone who will work hard for a glowing graduate school recommendation and the opportunity to work with a great kid; someone whose ultimate reward is taking pride in your child's development. A "professional" nanny will eat up your funds and teach your kid to stare into space while she's doing her own thing.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 08:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • absolutely, I think this is really reasonable! My nanny is about the same (650/wk) from 7-5 (so a few more dollars for a few more hours). I am so sick of hearing on here that I am underpaying my poor nanny. she is amazing, she cooks cleans and does housekeeping, we have had her for years and we love her to pieces as do our kids. And I get reports back from my SAHM friends about how attentive she is on walks at the park and at the corner store. not those cold inattentive on their cell phone type at all. yes 600 for 5 days is great. if she is an AMAZING cook as you said, then all the moreso what a bonus :) it is totally worth it!! you have found yourself a gem.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 08:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • thanks, Ladies! I will have just one baby & I will be working part-time so I will be there half the time. i appreciate the feedback!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 11:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • or you could share her with another UWS family with a baby, and pay around $70/day. a number of UWS families looking for a nanny share on nannyshareconnection.com.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.12.09, 05:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I pay my nanny more than that per hour and she doesn't cook or clean. One child, 18 months old. If she's scrubbing you toilet while your child is napping, how much energy is she going to have when he/she wakes up from nap and wants to play? Are you hiring a childcare professional or a slave?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.12.09, 02:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Oh god get over yourself.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.12.09, 05:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np: speaking only for myself, i'd rather come home to a calm and rested baby and a clean toilet than a baby who has been vigorously played with and a dirty toilet. but that's just me. if you want to use your energy cleaning toilets instead of playing with your kid, that's your choice.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.12.09, 05:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • ^^and let me just apologize b/c i think this is the nastiest post i've written here in months.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.12.09, 05:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • There is nothing precluding OP from hiring someone else to clean.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.12.09, 06:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • You missed the point jackass. She can play with the kid or clean - sometimes there's not enough time for both. So she can leave your little darling awake and ignored because she doesn't want Cruella DeVille to come home to a dirty toilet. I pay a maid to clean my toilet, but I don't ask her to watch my kid. Hope the least common denominator approach is working out for you.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.15.09, 08:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • nannies are hired to take care kids. Bath, stimulation, park, kids laundry, in other words anything to do with the kids. Some parents ask nannies to help kids with home work but cleaning that is asking a little too much.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.23.09, 08:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The problem with expecting the nanny to do all of these things is that you are going to measure the results differently. When you come home, there is either cooked food or not. The bathroom is clean or it is not. It is not readily apparent that she read books to your baby and helped him/her play with the shape sorter. So if there is not enough time during the day to do everything, there is some incentive on her part to skimp on the nannying in order to complete the tasks with immediately tangible results, lest she anger you.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.15.09, 09:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • thanks for the feedback! i will be home most of the time so i will focus on the baby while she helps out with other things. if i need to run an errand, she will watch the baby:)

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.15.09, 06:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]I am moving to the city and have a very strong connection at Spence (DD will be starting K in a year). Can anyone tell me what its reputation is and any first hand knowledge of it would be really appreciated. (both good and bad)

    25 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    08.22.09, 09:07 AM [ Flag ]
    • I know people who got off the Spence wl with "very strong connections". That's the most any connection will do (probably true at any school)--won't make a ding into an accept. Spence is tt. Tends to prefer kids with the highest erb scores.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 09:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Okay, thats not what I was asking though. ANy info on the school and it's rep? ( im not interested in college exmissions)

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.22.09, 10:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • if you want a traditional SS school, you can't go wrong with Spence. It has an excellent reputation.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 10:08 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • are the girls happy there

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.22.09, 12:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • that's kind of an odd question -- they are as happy there as they are at any other similar type school. I mean, it's an academic, traditional school. It's not a "peace love and happiness" kind of place. But the girls are just as happy there as one would expect.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.22.09, 01:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I thought the girls were very happy there - happier than some other tt schools. Every parent I met was absolutely thrilled to be part of the school. They all talked about the great community before they talked about the great academics. I think it is a wonderful school.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                08.22.09, 01:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Huh? I wasn't talking about college, but getting into Spence using connections.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.22.09, 01:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The mean smart rich dd's go there.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 11:38 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • It's considered an excellent school academically. We didn't personally visit, but from friends who did, they all thought it was a top-notch program, great school with great facilities, etc. Some people did feel that the parent body was more formal and dressier than at some other schools, and its reputation is that it's a bit flashier in terms of the community than some other schools. However, you could judge that for yourself. Its reputation is that it leans towards "alpha girls" in terms of the personality it looks for, although obviously all schools want a variety of types. It's also supposed to put a fair amount of weight on ERBs and to be a bit tougher on young summer birthdays than other comparable schools.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 12:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • welcome to new york! spence has many reputations, and i think you should ignore all of them. i know a few spence families and they are so happy there. one girl is blonde, blue eyed and has a really good time there, another is part indian and she is thriving as well. based on their experiences, i would say that the school does an excellent job of paying attention to each and every child, and making sure that socially each child is comfortable. academically, it seems fine, i'm sure it's more than fine. good luck!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 01:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • i think the best thing you can do is spend time with the strong connection and get that person to put you in touch with current spence parents. they can tell you what it's really like. also, go to any and all spence events that are open to the public. you'll get a vibe from that which you may or may not like.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 01:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OP seems to think the "strong connection" can help her. I know someone with a relative on the board who ended up on the wl and only got in because of wl movement. If this connection is a friend, it's worth very little--especially if the dd doesn't have very high erbs.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.22.09, 02:00 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np There aren't any Spence events that are "open to the public".

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.23.09, 07:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Spence is very demanding at the high school level.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.22.09, 01:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • have a friend there with two daughters in the lower school and they both already have reading tutors outside of school. weird that the school wouldn't be able to help them

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.22.09, 04:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np There are specialists and remediation (as well as enrichment) available. Maybe your friend doesn't want the school to know her dds need significant help?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.23.09, 06:32 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Many schools will give only so much help to a student. The ones that may be able to give more (e.g. Dwight, Birch, Columbia Grammar and Prep) are often maligned on this board. Not every school is a good fit for a child. (nnp)

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.23.09, 07:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Many kids at many schools in NYC have outside tutors and often it has much more to do with the parents competitiveness than with what the school offers or the child's actual need

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.23.09, 07:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]help! dh and i just made huge decision to relocate to southern CA. we don't want to live in LA. were thinking more like la jolla or manhattan beach or laguna. does anyone know what towns have top-notch public schools (and are very family-friendly) in that area of CA? we're totally open. money is an issue but not a huge one. thanks so much!

    51 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    06.15.09, 02:20 PM [ Flag ]
    • my in laws live in la jolla, which is the most beautiful place, but it is an older community. rancho sante fe is also nice and you get a lot more land. not sure about schools. the only people i know in both areas are older.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      06.15.09, 02:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Irvine, CA has the best schools in Southern Calif.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      06.15.09, 02:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • LOLOLOLOLOL! California's public schools are overrun by illegal aliens. Good luck with that, though.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      06.15.09, 02:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Not in the expensive towns.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        06.15.09, 02:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Um, not true. CA resident here, in one of those "expensive" towns. You've never heard of busing?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          06.15.09, 02:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • we're moving to CA! please let me know what "expensive" town you live in and your thoughts. thanks

            [ Reply | Options ]
            06.15.09, 02:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Los Angeles Unified School District encompasses the whole county of L.A. So there is a chance that school children will be bused. This is not an issue in Orange County. Each city has it's own school district so it would be highly unlikely that poor children would be bused out of district.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              06.15.09, 02:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Irvine is in Orange County

                [ Reply | Options ]
                06.15.09, 03:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • You're absolutely wrong about that. LAUSD doesn NOT encompass the whole county of LA, just most of it. There are many cities in LA county that do not belong to LAUSD. There is Santa Monica and Malibu, which have their own school districts. Beverly Hills has their own school district also, which is excellent. Culver City has their own and so does Burbank. If you go up beyond the valley there's Agoura Hills, Thousand Oaks, Calabasas (another excellent school district), and many other towns that are part of LA county but not LAUSD. Hope that helps. But it's correct that you don't want to send your kid to LAUSD. You may as well send them to school in Tijuana since more than 80% of the kids are Hispanic.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                06.15.09, 09:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • What town are do you live in?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            06.15.09, 02:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • really? no busing where I grew up.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            06.15.09, 02:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • huh? you know nothing, and CLEARLY have never been to CA. Don't know too many illegal aliens that can afford houses starting at 1mil, and the schools are by area (i.e. nice homes = nice school). Someone tell me why on earth I am feeding the troll?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        06.15.09, 02:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • You always pop up when anyone talks about California schools, you little racist troll. Do you get some kind of alert there under your creepy bridge when someone posts? Ick.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        06.15.09, 08:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np It's a FACT that CA is overrun with illegals. What planet are you on?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          06.15.09, 08:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • It's true, CA is overrun with illegals but then again, so is New York. Even worse, NY is also overrun with Puerto Ricans which is just as bad! So I think I'd rather live in CA than NY.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            06.15.09, 09:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Earth. You should visit.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            06.15.09, 09:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Great. How is it you don't know that CA is stuggling with a huge illegal immigration problem--one that costs the state billions a year?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              06.15.09, 09:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I don't live in East Los Angeles, Watts, or any of the border towns so the illegal alien problem doesn't bother me. I also don't collect welfare or state funded program money so the deficit doesn't concern me. Sure, my taxes are a little high (que sera, sera)...but so are taxes in NY...I wouldn't trade living in SoCal for anything. You can't argue the awesome weather & the layed back people. You NYers should try not to have such big sticks up your asses so much & relax like we do. :-)

                [ Reply | Options ]
                06.15.09, 09:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • what do the new yorkers do about the huge Puerto Rican problem?

                [ Reply | Options ]
                06.15.09, 09:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • Well the "Puerto Rican problem" that comes to mind is the issue of bigots fixating on hating us. We just keep doing what we do.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  06.16.09, 06:55 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • Puerto Ricans are American citizens. Most of the Puerto Ricans I know were (gasp!) born in New York City.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  08.23.09, 05:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I can know all about California's immigration issues - as well as all the state's issues that have nothing to do with immigration, such as ineffectual governance and inane public and fiscal policy - without resorting to reducing an entire group of HUMAN BEINGS to the dehumanizing term "illegals" and without implying that *all* schools in the entire state of California (with and without illegal immigrants) are somehow horrible/unfit bc some do have illegal immigrants as students.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                06.15.09, 09:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • "Illegal" is a term for people who are here illegally, Stupid. If the shoe fits.... There's nothing you can say to make it untrue, when Latinos come here illegally then they are considered "Illegal Aliens" - get it? And the fact is that the schools with the higher number of children who are illegal or are only legal because their mothers were crowning as they crossed the border, are the schools that perform the worst. It's a fact! Look it up.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  06.15.09, 09:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • btw: Billions of dollars are spent each year in emergency room care, schools, free-lunch programs in schools, and welfare for illegals! You can look up those stats too, lame-brain.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    06.15.09, 09:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • Sigh. I have decided to pretend you do not exist as the alternative makes me throw up in my mouth a little. Please continue your spewing of vitriol and name-calling, your stingy, hateful spirit, and your inability to empathize or imagine a life without resources - it clearly seems to get you off. Me, I'll be elsewhere.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      06.15.09, 09:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • np You're totally delusional. Continue covering your ears and singing "lalala--I don't hear you" like a toddler, but the truth is the truth.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        06.15.09, 09:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • Stingy? Are you friggin' kidding me? Oh, I'm sorry, since I don't believe in paying welfare to millions of people who shouldn't even be in this country then go ahead & consider me "stingy" (eyeroll). Puhleeeeze! I think the only one getting off here is you with your blind bad eyes & the muffs over your ears (is it still THAT cold in NYC?) Idiot.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        06.16.09, 06:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Are you some Native American princess? You are truly a sick puppy.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          06.16.09, 06:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Oh....Hello Anti working Mom Psycho.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          06.16.09, 06:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • np Difference is that many immigrants now come here for freebies--WIC, Medicaid, food stamps, public housing (hell, Obama's aunt's living in public housing even though she was told to leave the country years ago).

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          06.16.09, 07:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • You can call me Anti-Working Mom and Anti-Illegal Alien if you'd like, but the only "psycho" around here is you. :-) Have a nice day.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          06.16.09, 07:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • what is wrong with calling like it is? Arnold was right, learn to speak the language, pay taxes, work your way up.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          08.22.09, 10:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • couldn't agree with you more

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          08.22.09, 10:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • santa barbara

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.23.09, 07:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]OK WOHM's please help me! Dropped dc's off at day care as I do every week 3 days a week. There was a baby in db's room that clearly needed his mommy - was throwing up, had a helmet type thing on his head. Sinc ei left that room I have just felt like I could burst into tears and feel like all kids need their mommy and wonder what the he!! I was doing leaving them and going to work. I've always just made peace with the fact that I am a WOHM today is the first day I am struggling. I am sure everyone has been here but today it just slammed me. Words of wisdom to make me feel better would be fabulously appreciated. And, trolls, seriously, do not tell me I am a lousy mom because I work.

    89 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    08.17.09, 06:49 AM [ Flag ]
    • Aw poor mommy! Hugs. I'm not going to lie or sugarcoat - I think we all know that children need their moms. In a perfect world we would all get to be with them. But it is not a perfect world, and acknowledging that you know they need you, doesn't mean they won't be perfectly fine if you work. So, you just carry on and do the best that you can. You are a good mom, you keep being a good mom. My motto is I'm good enough. And I am!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 06:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I strongly disagree with this. A "perfect world" does not mean one in which all women would stay at home with their dcs.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:00 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Ditto. In my perfect world Mom works PT, Dad works PT, baby with parents most of the time and an occasional babysitter. When older more daycare/preschool. But that's just me, everyone's perfect view is different.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • This is what we have, both parents work p/t. We planned this before kids and even helped us live on a budget.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Op here - we did this for a few months so that we could have more time at home with DB - I loved it but I found that dh tended to work every evening/night and could not relax. He's a better person working FT!

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 07:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I also agree that if mom and dad could each work PT it would be perfect. If I could work 2 days a week I would love it - my MIL watches my dc's 2 days a week so working those days would be fine for me. I like day care /preschool for kids once they turn 2 or 3 too.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Exactly.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • saw a post below saying that the SAHM moms were posting and wanted to make it clear, I am first responder and a WOHM.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • ok, then you're a wohm nut.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • What is the matter with you?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:27 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • nothing. the issue is what is the matter with YOU, suggesting that a perfect world is one in which all women sah.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 07:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I'm not the OR, I am the person who thinks you have some lessons to learn about not calling people nuts. And I found her post to be supportive. She said babies need their moms (I agree) and in a perfect world moms would get to stay at home with their babies (I agree). She didn't say you were a bad mom if you had to go to work 4 weeks after your child was born. Stop calling people names! It is unattractive - even if I can't see your face.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                08.17.09, 08:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • NP. I didn't find her post to be supportive and all and was also surprised to hear that she is (supposedly) a WOHM.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  08.17.09, 08:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • you don't think it's nuts because you share that point of view. i think it's nuts to suggest that, and your plea to the contrary is just not going to change my mind.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  08.17.09, 08:27 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITD. dbs do NOT need their moms "all the time." Some separation is at worst harmless for a child and can even be good. What's important is that the caretaker(s) are loving and trustworthy and that mom & dad are around a lot....but it doesn't have to be 24x7.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • This is just silly. Whenever anyone argues that a baby is better off being cared for by someone other than a parent - they are in it only to argue. And we're not talking about a few hours at grandma's. OP was upset about daycare.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 08:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • is this child new to the center? The helmet means nothing -- some kids have them b/c the way they sleep causes a flat head. It's not a big deal at all. but the throwing up -- was this child sick? or throwing up from being upset? or was he having a temper tantrum?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 06:55 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I agree that the helmet doesn't mean anything - just made it worse for me that the poor baby seemed to be sick. He was upset too. I have never seen him so he could be new - my db just started so hard to say.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:03 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • this isn't going to make you feel any better but i feel that all young babies need their moms and what is happening to this world that babies are dropped off in baby factories where their cries are not attended to and their need to be picked up and hugged and loved is not being met. i hate daycare and am vehemently against it for dc's. i respect taht many moms absolutely need to work, but if so, a nanny at home is so much better. maybe you should follow your instincts and look into getting a nanny so your dc can at least be in their own home and cared for in an more sane environment. i'm sorry to upset you but the thought of that baby crying and throwing up makes me wonder why the mom had him in the first place.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 06:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • so if we work out an equation: daycare<nanny<mom? how 'bout we just say it all works out in the end, and op is having a bad day, but hardly irrevocably harming her child.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 06:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • yes, i would for sure venture to say that the baby who was "clearly needing his mommy" and was throwing up might be emotionally harmed if he does not have his physical nad emotional needs met day after day. what else would happen to him if this becomes the case day after day, the poor thing? do you think he'll be optimistic and happy after 2 years of that? i don't think so.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • but no one is saying this is a day after day situation. and you, my dear, are not psychic. why not hold on to the bitter pill you ate and not share with anyone else.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • ITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 09:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np you shouldn't have done this

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 06:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I would have agreed with you about day care vs nanny until I had a cr@ppy nanny. Now, I would never leave my baby with someone I didn't know very well. I like the multiple adults in the room with the kids, I like the socialization and the crying baby was getting a ton of attention.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • so you think this baby was just crying for attention? i think the baby was crying because he was feeling what a baby feels as sadness and that a mom or a nanny with whom he has bonded, picking him up will show him that the world is a responsive to his needs place to live in, as opposed to having a stone put in his outstretched hand. dramatic yes, but true. if he were with his mom or a caring nanny he would be hugged, fed and played with. of courses nannies need to be checked out and trained, but daycare is a sad place for babies.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:10 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • you've obviously never been to a day care center - I do not find them sad at all. Again, I used to think the same way you do until I found a fabulous center with teachers/ care givers that I would have in my own home taking care of my children. My timing is actually good with day care - with the market the way it is and so many out of work, the classes are very small and babies are getting a great deal of attention. I think this particular baby was crying because he is sick - hence, the puking.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • You are TOO MUCH lady! She said that the baby was being attended to & which would show him that the "world is responsive to his needs"! FWIW, how on earth do you know that a nanny would pick the kid up - she many very well think the kid needs to cry & there are no checks like there are in daycare. Kids in quality daycare or with quality nannies are not damaged in any way & are sometimes better off than dc of SAHMs - they are in no way worse off as you seem to assume.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 08:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • you don't know what you're talking about, or you've never seen a good daycare, which can be infinitely better than nannies because of the socialization and the number of adults around. at least limit it to say, "in your experience," and not act like you can speak for ALL daycare centers. please! some nannies abuse the kids, too, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't use nannies. what is up with these broad, unqualified generalizations?!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • babies don't need socialization; what they need for well-being and optimism about the world is to have their physical and comfort needs met. if a mom has to work, a nanny (granted trusted, interviewed, check on, watched with dc) can provide this far better than daycare.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • sorry, i'm just not going to give you the agreement you seem to be looking for. it makes no sense to say, unqualified, that nannies are, by definition, better than daycare.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I don't agree but I see your point.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:19 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Why do we all have to follow your moral guidelines? I'm sure you're doing some things that others wouldn't approve of.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • is it moral to feel sadness for that baby who was throwing up and clearly needed his mom, as the OP said?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • No, I'm objecting to OR's tone and wording. Read OR's post. Reeks of self-righteously.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I feel for that baby and if was his mom I would want to be called immediately and I would go get him (this is OP). They called his mom within 5 minutes of him throwing up

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Well then I assume she came and picked him up. This could've happened anywhere, whether the DB was with mommy or nanny.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 07:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Oh, you "respect" that moms absolutely need to work. How kind of you. I work because I choose to - care to come over and sterlize me?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np Y'know what? I don't respect moms that say they "need" to work. They need to work to maintain their quality of life is what it is. As for moms like you, I wouldn't take it as far as sterilization, but truly I do wonder why you had children. You really aren't raising them, no matter what you tell yourself about the hours that you're actually home.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 09:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Shrug. Don't really care what you think.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 10:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Are you seriously this stupid? My parents made $40k. Combined. We lived in a studio apartment. There were no nice things that we could have forgone and had my mom SAH. You're a spoiled, entitled, princess. BTW, I am Ivy League educated, with a Masters degree, working at a nonprofit. My life is just fine, even though my mother worked.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 10:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • it's women like you who I always want to ask why you even bother educating your daughters. Why not just send them to cooking school and baby care classes becuase what's the point of having them strive for anything for themselves, if they are just supposed to give it all up when they have kids? Or in the alternative if your daughter wants to go to lawschool or medical school are you going to require that she agree to never have kids?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • and yes, of course you can always quit a job. but no one goes to Law school or Medical school INTENDING to give it up, when they have kids. They may decide to do that, but NO 20 yo woman who is killing herself in college to get good enough grades to get into medical school and then killing herself to surive and complete medical school is thinking "well I'll do this for a few years until I decide to have babies" It's not like going to secretarial school.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 08:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I think you have it all wrong. I am college (a very good college) educated and never thought when I was in school that I would be a stay at home mom one day. But, my priorities changed, and here I am. I don't ever think of myself as having given anything up. I really see it as a gain, all the way around. But, that's me.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                08.20.09, 04:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • If you are still out there, then you are the one that has it all wrong. That was choice, which you made at the time, and happens to be the same choice I made. In fact, I have a law degree. My point was that you seem to be saying that anyone who has kids should stay home with them, becuase you don't understand why a women would even have kids if they are just going to leave them with other caregivers and go to work. So my point was if you know you want to have kids why even bother getting an education or establishing a career if you HAVE to give it up to have kids. What's the point. I spent 100k on my law degree (forget my college degree) if I knew I was going to HAVE to give it up I never would have done that. It's the choice that matters. ...

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  08.23.09, 06:46 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I know every daycare is different, but at ours the babies were held. a lot. maybe not as much as a mom but certainly more than a mom who had to clean her house, work from home, cook dinner, etc.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 10:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I also think that nannies are usually best for very young children, but I realize that they are very expensive and out of reach of most families. Parents do their best, and few can afford to stay home with their children or to hire a nanny to do so. I don't know why you feel the need to make them feel bad about this.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • historically, women have had the luxury of being with their children all the time (nor the desire). you are no different. don't let outside forces tell you what is right for you.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 06:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • OP, sounds like you've got the sahm nuts on board who are implicitly or explicitly suggesting that life would be better if you stayed at home with your dcs. This is not necessarily true. You should do what makes you happy because that will make you a better parent. Moreover, it's not the staying at home that will make your children happy, successful, well-adjusted members of society, it's the values you transmit to them and the role-modeling that you do for them. one important lesson you are providing is that it is possible to make contributions to the world as a wohm and be a great mom. you are both, and that's an important, significant lesson, not to mention the role modeling that you do in your workplace (re: work-life balance) and ...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 07:05 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ^^(re: work-life balance) and for women who wonder can it be done. Yes, it can, and you're doing it. How do i know all this? b/c my mom was a wife, mother, wohm, who went back to school and recently earned her doctorate. i could not be more proud of the lessons she has imparted. and having gone to tt ivy leagues, i obviously didn't suffer for the choice, either. GL.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Thank you! This almost made me cry - having a sensitive day! Unsure how I would do as a SAHM but right now, it's not an option financially. That being said, I am lucky to love my job, have an enormous amount of flexibility and work 5 minutes from home. Things could be worse - I could commute 2 hours each way and only have a short time every day with my children. For my 3.5 yo this is the best thing - she is painfully shy and the socialization at day care is so much more than she would get at home. I figured I'd get the holier than thou crowd all worked up - it was not on purpose - was really looking for people like you to try to put things in perspective. Thanks!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • you've got a TON going for you -- stay positive! especially with a "painfully shy" dd, you are teaching her some important lessons about independence, etc. focus on the good stuff and keep your chin up.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:22 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Thanks. Today is just one of thos cr@ppy mom days. I definitely see a world of difference in my dd so I will never feel like day care was not the right thing.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 07:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • np Honestly, I do not think I am holier than thou. It's not about being better than you AT ALL. It's truly wondering why you wanted to have kids if you could not be with them in their baby years. I just will never understand that.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 09:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I see mothering as a lifetime responsibility, it's not about just the baby years, to raise our kids to grow up independent, loving, open and self-sufficient, and nothing about being a wohm keeps me from doing that.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 10:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Of course it is a lifetime responsibility. But our culture takes the self-sufficiency thing way too far, way too early. For god's sake, we have books on how to get 3-month-olds to "self-soothe," which is a sad, sad joke.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                08.17.09, 10:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Because mothering is about hours logged? Oh, please. It's not my fault you're too uneducated to get a job, Jenny.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 10:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Let's be clear, you are, in fact, 100% saying you're better.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 10:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I will never understand why you would be a judgemental bitch. But hey, we all have our issues.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 10:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • And I am truly wondering why YOU wanted to have kids if YOU don't plan to be with them throughout all of the years, not just the baby years. I mean, seriously, why on EARTH did you have children if you plan to send them to school? I hope you are not implying that you don't plan to teach be with them every moment of every day for the next 18 (at least!) years! How will they grow and feel loved and nurtured if you do not home-school them and never let them out of your sight? You sound like a horrible mother, planning to abandon your children to the care of others during the daytime after the "baby years!" Please re-assure me that this is not the case, and that you WILL be home-schooling and home with your kids for ever and ever and ever....

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 12:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I think I rather home-school then to send my DC to those institutions called schools where WOHMs are the teachers. What kind of an example are they setting? In fact, I'll only go to hospitals where the doctors and nurses are men. I can't believe the nerve of some women.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                08.17.09, 01:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np Yeah, because her baby at day care is really impressed with all the life lessons that mommy is imparting. Puh-leeeze.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 09:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • can you read? her dd is 3.5.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 10:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • yes, but what about the parents that dump a baby under one year in a daycare? what kind role modeling values is this kid getting, other than being shown that they have to wait to have their needs met? babies under one, BION, are developing their feelings of trust and well being and optimism about the world they have just entered.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 07:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Yes!!!! Nicely said

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 10:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I think the bigger issue s/b the US being the nation it is and having the worst leave policy for parents of newborn children. Why aren't the liberals pushing for this? Forget univerasal healthcare!!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 07:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Why are only liberals responsible for quality of life issues?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • because there are 47M uninsured people out there, and we can't even get anyone to give a crap about them (most of them are children, btw). you can imagine if someone said we wanted to have time with our children.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • umm..i agree the current system stinks, but almost every state has a program for health insurance/care for poor or uninsured children.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 10:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Seeing as how OP described DC as a DC and not a DB, I assume this won't help. I don't think the problem is family leave per se, but the focus on work work work. No vacations, crazy hours, work work work.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I completely agree with you - it is pathetic that time off with a newborn in this country is called "disability". I find it absurd that there are only a few 3rd world countries that have poilcies similar to the US. In the US there is so much focus on working that the thought of family is left on the wayside. Pitiful.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • There will be hard days whether you SAH or WOH. Just think of it as a bad day.. tomorrow will be better.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 07:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • 1) it's only 3 days a week, so not the majority of his time. You must have selected the daycare for a reason? It will help your child to be more social and adjustable. Believe me, I went the nanny route and I worry I've created spoiled brats. Having to share, etc. in school has been very helpful.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 09:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Yes, but babies under one year of age don't need to socialize or learn to share. They do need to develop a sense of trust that they count and that their needs will predictability be met. I think a nanny provides this far better than daycare can. Daycare at age two is a whole other issue; that is when kids need to learn the interactions, but before, they are vulnerable little beings and day and day learn about their world depending on how their needs are met.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 07:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • maybe, maybe not. impossible to make generalizations about this. depends on the daycare, depends on the nanny.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 07:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • You or dh stay home with your kids when they are throwing up, I assume? You don't put a helmet on your kids head? Chill out, you are ok.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 10:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Remind yourself that you are providing for your family.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 01:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • love our day care-#2 will start at 6 months as did #1. lots of 1:1 care. much more stimulation and stuff going on than at home. nanny idea scares me.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 07:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Is Browning a TT school or a 2nd tier school?

    28 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    08.15.09, 04:19 PM [ Flag ]
    • I would say third tier.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.15.09, 04:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • While this is an arguable point considering the college placement I would not automatically write off this school even if your dc is a high scorer on the ERB. The lower school is a great place for boys who may need a little nurturing and the school's emphasis on the importance of developing as a "gentleman" helps to create a well rounded individual. There's a tone of comraderie and affection I haven't seen in any other school - co-ed or ss. That said I don't think a large percentage of Browning K students stay through to grade 12. IMO, its physical size works against it but I would strongly endorse the lower school.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 08:49 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Never even heard of it

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.15.09, 04:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Its a a very warm and wonderful school.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.15.09, 07:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • ^^^ Less than 30 boys per class in the upper school.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.15.09, 07:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • per class or grade?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.15.09, 08:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • per grade. Some boys thrive in that setting ...others who want more peers, sports, etc change schools. Browning students can take some classes at other privates if there is something not offered there.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.16.09, 03:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Comparable to Hewitt or Marymount among the boys schools.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.16.09, 10:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • This year closer to 40 in K. The new admissions director is targeting high scoring kids so they say.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 06:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • the new admissions director was the worst interviewer i ever experienced...no questions, just a long long boring monologue about sonmething--thought it was us until I heard she did it with others

      [ Reply | Options ]
      08.17.09, 08:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • While the shoes of the former DOA are hard to fill ( now at CSH)the new DOA had a very tough year last year (2008) which was her first on the job at Browning.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 08:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • did Barbara Root leave???

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 08:38 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Yes.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            08.17.09, 08:45 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Yes, I heard she retired. Jackie Casey is equally as warm, nice and down to earth as BR but without the caftans and physical presence.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              08.17.09, 08:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • OR: don't know anything about Barbara Root but the commercial you did for Jackie might or might not be true but it does not take away from the fact she was a terrible face for the school

                [ Reply | Options ]
                08.17.09, 09:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • Jackie was a terrible face for Brwoning? She left in spring 2008. The new person's dh passed away in the beginning of the 2008-09 school year and I think that deserves a little empathy. Sorry you did not have a good experience. I do miss Jackie.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  08.17.09, 09:10 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • SEe I could not even remember the interviewer's name it was so bad, so I assumed it was theat person Jackie who interviewed us last Nov/Dec.. I am very sorry for the new person's horrific loss..maybe her suffering manifested itself in "too much babble"..I hope she recovers in all ways...

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    08.17.09, 09:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Jackie is now at CSH. Was formerly at Browning. Not sure who the new DOA at B is.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                08.17.09, 09:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • why did she have such a tough year?? given the continued excess demand over supply for these seats --I assume she filled her classes so what is/was the issue in your mind????

          [ Reply | Options ]
          08.17.09, 09:07 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • still confused --is the current DOA the same as the DOA who interviewed parents for K last year??

        [ Reply | Options ]
        08.17.09, 09:22 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]

Your settings system defaults

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

UrbanBaby Asks...

Are you or your partner ever naked in front of your children?

Already voted? View Results

See previous polls »