advertisement
Click Here
On GameSpot: Super Street Fighter IV confirmed!
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]Visited Hoboken yesterday(good friends moved there) and I have to say I was very pleasantly surprised. DH and I are talking about it as an option (due in 5 mos) for more space but we had never considered it befroe. Any Hobokeners on?

    16 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.08.09, 08:13 AM [ Flag ]
    • we moved to hoboken last year and love it

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.08.09, 08:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • yup, live here and love it. glad you enjoyed your time here!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.08.09, 08:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I have a couple of friends there with small kids and they love it. I don't think the school options are great, but you have time to worry about that.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.08.09, 08:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Moved here 7 years ago, now have 2 kids (1yo and 3yo). I love it, but it isn't the same as living in Manhattan. Not in a bad way, but anyone who tries to sell you on "oh, it's just like being in the city..." isn't being honest. Some things are better: more for your money, housing-wise, slightly slower pace), some things aren't (fewer school options, can't take a cab home from the city, if your friends are in the city, it takes a lot of planning and cajoling to get them to visit). I have times that I really miss living on the UWS, but moving here was a great choice for us and our family.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.08.09, 08:52 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Love it love it love it. Have 2 kids ages 1 and 4. Sending older kid to public preschool here (free and good). For elementary not sure yet but charter schools are excellent and hearing good things about the public elementary esp. Wallace. Great sense of community. New mayor and board of ed members + increasingly active parents = things are looking up for education. There's a yahoo group -- google HobokenMoms -- and you can get a lot more information there.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 08:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I didn't think there was a supermarket in Hoboken, is that accurate?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 09:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • and isn't the town bankrupt? property taxes are insane.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 09:07 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • No -- there's a very large shoprite and an A&P, plus a Target and a larger A&P less than a mile away

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 09:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • but you need a car to get to those. you can't walk over to a supermarket, right? it's all bodegas or cvs

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 09:19 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Yes, you can walk to the A&P at 7th and Clinton or the Shoprite at 9th and Madison -- the whole city is only a mile square. And I have walked to the Target in Jersey City many times. We also have a Garden of Eden and several health food stores.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 09:33 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I don't get it. Is moving to an apartment in Hoboken like a stopover before you move to a house in another burb? With 2 young dcs we will either stick it out in the city or buy a house in the burbs, not an apartment in the burbs. it doesn't make sense to me.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 09:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ditto. particularly in a burb with barely any good schools and property taxes as high as places where you actually get a yard. no thanks. i'd move to brooklyn before i'd move to hoboken.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 09:56 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Or looking at it another way -- it's the best of both worlds. More space and quieter than the city, but still really close to manhattan and very walkable, lively, great street life and sense of community.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 06:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]On Friday night I put my nanny's envelope with cash (and even some quarters since I ran out of money!) halfway into her bag like I do every week. She has to push the envelope in to close her bag. On Sat, she called me up and says she has nothing in her bag and asks me if I paid her. She also says she doesn't remember putting it in her bag or seeing it at all, and therefore isn't sure I paid her at all. Of course I did. I looked all over my apt and it's not there. What do I do now? Not only is she out a week's pay, but I paid her and now she seems to allow for doubt that I never did.

    56 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.16.09, 11:24 AM [ Flag ]
    • Wow - why do you do this awkward method of paying her to begin with? Can't you just give it to her?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np: i had a nanny once who was uncomfortable with hand off and always wanted it in an envelope. i assumed it was a cultural discomfort with openness about money.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 11:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I always pay my nanny in an envelope but I had it to her. Envelope and hand off are not mutually exclusive.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 11:29 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • agreed. just giving an example of how people have different comfort levels with money transfer.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 11:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • oops - lesson learned. hand to hand hand-off required for cash... you were the last one with it in your hand.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I think you have to pay her again. You always give someone the benefit of the doubt once. From now on you set up a better system - maybe count the money in front of her and have her sign a receipt. FWIW I have had both underpaid and overpaid nannies/sitters more than once and always trust their report. It has never happened with the same person twice.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:27 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Yeah, but this is the whole wad, not just an underpayment! I was thinking of giving her the holiday bonus early in lieu of doing nothing or re-paying (since neither of those options seem right).

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 11:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np: you have to pay her for that week! bonus in lieu of a paycheck? not a good omen for 2010 and that nanny sticking with you.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 11:32 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • NP - by not repaying, you are in essence accusing your nanny of lying. I think you have to repay her. I can't believe you aren't considering doing so. As poster above stated, lesson learned, hand her the money from now on.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 11:32 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • No, I think she lost it. I think she also knows she lost it.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 11:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • if you are op, and think your nanny is lying, then you need to fire her of course. now, either put up (pay her or fire her for lying/stealing) or shut up.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 11:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I'm confused. You don't think she is lying, but you think she lost the $ and is now telling you she didn't, but that isn't lying? OP - you need to get your shit straight.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 11:49 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I think it's easier to say she doesn't remember. I am not sure she's lying, but it seems suspect that she didn't check for 24 hours and never saw it at all.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.16.09, 12:02 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • I'm sorry OP, but you are being very contradictory. You seem to be saying your nanny isn't lying, but she isn't telling the truth. Also, you clearly don't trust her as you say it "seems suspect." I think you probably need a new nanny.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.16.09, 12:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • that she delayed in calling you to tell you she didn't have it doesn't mean she didn't check when she got home and saw that it wasn't there. there many reasons why she wouldn't have called you right away. you need to pay her again. or fire her for lying. your call.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.16.09, 12:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • She probably was robbed. You have to decide what to do. I personally would not pay her again. that's her problem, not mine.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 02:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Is there a reason you're not writing her a check? It just seems like this would be easier and more efficient -- not sure what your situation is, of course.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • N

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 11:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • NP: our babysitter, an immigrant, didn't want a check. I always paid her in cash and told her as I put it in her bag. She and I decided to put the cash in an envelope so that (1) she wouldn't have random bills floating around in her purse for the subway ride home and (2) so she could keep it out of her drunk husbands sight. I'm pretty sure she didn't put the money in the bank so that she could keep it away from her husband. I only learned this over time, but people have their reasons for cash and envelopes. BTW: OP you need to pay her again.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 11:38 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • np: I disagree that OP needs to pay her again.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:00 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Why do I have to pay her again? How do I know someone didn't take it out of her bag? I already paid her and I don't understand how she doesn't know that.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:01 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • How don't you understand this? She doesn't have the money, therefore she thinks you might have forgotten to pay her. She has no evidence that you did pay her.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 12:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Nanny prefers cash.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 11:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • you have to pay her again. and it should not affect her bonus. you have to have a better method of bookkeeping - do a count out and have her sign the receipt. you don't know that she lost it - since you put it halfway in her bag, it might have fallen out. a mess but you'll unfortunately have to repay and not let this affect bonus.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:38 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • There are only two options here. Either you trust her, in which case you pay her again and chalk it up to the cost of doing business. Or you think she's lying and don't trust her, in which case pay her a week of severance and find a new nanny. There is no option which allows you to NOT pay her again AND trust her enough to continue caring for your dc.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • You need a new system. She should check her bag before she leaves for the day. If she didn't remember closing her bag and seeing the money, why did she not check at the end of the day before she left? Then she doesn't notice until the next day. I look in my purse a lot and would notice if an envelope of money was missing. Something sounds fishy here.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:46 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • so, blame the nanny. i cannot believe what i am reading. OP, you either need to pay her again, believing that no matter who lost the money, the nanny didn't know she had it and then lost it, or you need to fire her for lying and stealing. you have no other choice.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 11:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I am not blaming the nanny but something doesn't add up here. If you knew that a lot of money was in an envelope in your purse and YOU didn't remember seeing it, wouldn't you check before you went home. I don't like to carry large sums of money around but I would certainly check my bag if I didn't remember seeing it. Also it bothers me that she didn't call until the 'next day'. How did she not notice it until the next day???

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 11:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • So you are blaming the nanny! OP - you can't have it both ways. You either think nanny is lying/dishonest or you don't!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 11:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I am simply not sure. She's only been with us for a few months. All I know is that I did pay.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 12:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • NP: But you don't know that she knows that you did. There was at least one time with my former nanny that we forgot it was Friday and I didn't pay her and she didn't notice. From your nanny's POV, that could easily have happened in this case as well. Unless you think she is lying to you, which as many posters have pointed out is a whole other issue.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.16.09, 12:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Well as others have mentioned you do have to pay her again. If not you don't trust her and you should let her go, or she will be offended and upset that she will end up leaving on her own anyway. Pay her again but start putting the envelope in her hand.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.16.09, 12:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Why the hell did you not make sure that the nanny saw the money and acknowledged it to you (like with a simple "Thank you"). Sorry, you have to cough it up again. Next time be a little smarter.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:49 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I have a nanny and pay in cash and put cash in envelope each week. However, I always hand her the envelope. Why would you just stick it halfway in her purse? That is weird! I agree with other posters. You either accept it was your mistake and pay her again or you fire her because you don't believe her/hence you don't trust her.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I alway leave my money for her out on the foyer table under a coaster, that way I know she puts it into her own purse. I would never go into someone else's purse.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:00 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I don't go into her purse. She leaves it there open and I set it half on top of the bag and half in the crease. That's how I know she has to push it in to close her bag.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I've put the envelope in her purse before, but I always tell her at the time that I'm doing it.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • It doesn't matter if she is uncomfortable with you handing her money. You can pay her again and say "But to avoid this happening again, I need to hand you the money from now on." Problem solved.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:09 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • this happened to me gave my nanny cash in an envelope and the next day she said we were 100 short... now everytime I pay in cash I make the person I am paying count it, and if someone pays me I count it in front of them

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I put nanny's weekly in an envelope, her name and date on the front of the envelope, and leave it on the kitchen counter at the same spot every time. When the envelope is gone, I know she's been paid. Putting it half-way into her bag is a TERRIBLE idea. This arrangement is both your fault, but you are richer and you should bear the burden and re-pay her. How do you know your kid didn't pull the envelope out of her bag and put it in the garbage? I guarantee that is what my toddler would have done.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 01:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np: we do the EXACT same thing as you. and btw, i am pretty certain that my 18 mo threw away 2 of my credit cards ...

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 01:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • NP: My DS did lose my ATM card. I left it by the computer after buying something online, we found it inside one of our speakers 2 years later!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 01:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • haha i am sorry you had to go through that stress but that is quite the feat and very funny!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 04:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • poster from above - recently "mis-placed" my Amex. i know that little rascal was behind it!!!

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 06:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • np: a little off-topic, but my reading glasses disappeared from my bedside table. pretty new, looked everywhere, couldn't find them. this was in winter, and in spring i was walking through the backyard with dc and noticed something shiny sticking out of the ground. our dog had apparently stolen them and buried them in the backyard! i would never, ever have guessed.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.16.09, 06:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Is it the nanny or YOU that's so uncomfortable with the money thing? get over it. you really need to hand your nanny the money, period, end full stop.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 05:57 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Look at it as an expensive lesson, I guess! You two can figure out a new system in which she confirms that she has the money. You do need to pay her again, though. No matter how sure you are that you put it in her bag, you just can't be sure she got it.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 05:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Going forward, pay her by check. If she doesn't like it, find a new nanny. IMHO, you're going to be in that position soon enough. Oh yeah, I don't think you have to pay her.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 06:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]How good is LYCEE of NY academically? Some of the moms I know there brag so much about the school. Just wondering how real this all is ..........

    53 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    10.31.09, 07:52 PM [ Flag ]
    • 3rd tier according to UB.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      10.31.09, 08:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • So interesting ... I swear, talking to some of the moms you'd think it their dcs are so much smarter than the other kdis because they know a foreign language well. I mean, it is impressive but so is doing physics well, etc.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        10.31.09, 08:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • The French curriculum is MUCH stronger in Math, Science and Humanities than the American Curriculum. In general, EU curriculum (Spain, Italy, English, Belgium...) have a very strong classical education (read: they do not admit students with an American High School diploma--even the UB TTs--to European universities with out TWO years of American college/university classes!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          10.31.09, 08:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Read Backwards.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            10.31.09, 08:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Can you "read backwards"?!?! Is that what they were busy teaching at Marymount?!?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              10.31.09, 08:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • NP: Unclear what you mean. My dh graduated from HS in Germany and was admitted directly to an Ivy for undergraduate.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              10.31.09, 08:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • it means that if the opposite situation were true- if you had a US HS diploma, you wouldn't necessarily be eligible for entry into a European university. I did a BA here, then went to France and was given a 3-year equivalency, not a 4-year equivalency.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 08:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • The lycee prepares kids for the Bac. It is indeed extremely rigorous but light on critical thought, flexibility and thinking outside the box. It is the ultimate "teaching to the test". Here is a giant body of knowledge - now learn it. Pretty joyless and uninspired. The best American schools are better educationally, imho, and I was educated in Europe.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.01.09, 04:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • NP--The French split their schools (track them) into University and trade... The curriculum at Lycee is from the University track in France. It is all in French (English only as a "Foreign language") and very challenging because the students have to pass the international bacculaurate exam upon graduation.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            10.31.09, 08:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Not exactly. Being a French school, the Lycee prepares kids for the French baccalaureate. The International baccalaureate is a different (excellent, language-independent) exam and assoiciated curriculum.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              10.31.09, 09:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Here's the accurate info: the kids at Lycee have the option of the French bac, the International bac, or the new French-American bac.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 08:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • The British curriculum is, sadly, not terribly strong. British private schools usually go beyond it, but their average kid from a local public is NOT better off than ours. Also, British curriculum is narrow--kids take a series of tests at age 16 after which school no longer compulsory, and many don't continue on to A-levels, which require you to specialize in a few subjects in preparation for university entrance exams. Not quite fair to compare the systems--apples and oranges. And plenty of ignorant kids on both sides of the pond.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.01.09, 01:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Just not so.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.01.09, 09:26 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Not here in the US it is not. That's the problem with the LFNY. Very non-rigorous academically

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.01.09, 03:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • This is BS. It's amazing to me the drivel people post just to validate themselves on this board!!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.01.09, 03:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Aren't there kids from US high schools who directly go to UK universities, like Oxford or St Andrew's?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.01.09, 04:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Actually, the French require 3 years of physics (as do the Spanish and Italian national curriculums) and they require a NATIONAL test to prove it. US HS do not even offer this.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          10.31.09, 08:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I think it is supposed to be OK in early years, but just terrible later. We know someone who used to teach there (he's French) and he said by about age 11/12 the academics just fall off the chart. He didn't send his children there.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Lycee is only 3rd tier here because UB folks don't value and exclusive European education (read: they can not get in because they are not rich enough, connected enough or French enough). BTW: my kid does not attend, but I do know and respect the Traditional european curriculum. They only teach in French (not English) so you have to be ready to support the French homework (meaning: hire a tutor).

      [ Reply | Options ]
      10.31.09, 08:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • If you are French or are planning for your child to attend a French speaking university (as in, go to the Sorbonne, etc...), Lycee will prepare your child very well. Outsiders rarely gain access to this school, however. So, only apply if you have contacts or can donate tons of money.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      10.31.09, 08:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • You or your dh would have to be French and living in the US or work for a prestigious French company, bank or the government... to get in. The school prepares kids for the baccalaureate test, which determines what options on school and such are open to these kids. It is a totally different system to the US and much harder with much more depth in the humanities than US schools. It is hardly tier 3 or 4 as it is virtually unattainable to anyone on this site.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.01.09, 03:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • The French Bac is very rigorous. Having passed it in France, I was given one year worth of credits when I came to college in the US and was able to complete my studies in 3 years. To claim that the Lycee is 3rd tier doesn't make much sense.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.01.09, 09:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • thousands of French DCs pass it every year...it's not that big a deal. Even Dwight offers it

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.01.09, 09:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • It makes a lot of sense. The best high schools in US prepare kids better for college than do French Lycees, which abroad are not exactly what they are in France. Also, keep in mind that student in US schools who took APs also could skip a year of college. My sister and I both did. LYCEE of NY is not the same as a French school, and that is the major difference.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.01.09, 03:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • This is no longer the case - since AP's are so prevalent now, most colleges will only allow a total of 2 credits gained through scores of 4 or 5 on AP exams.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 07:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • not that different from taking a few AP courses at any decent private or good public school, can test out of many intro level classes at college and all my friends from a DC private got into the int'l colleges they applied to

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 05:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • excellent response about it being unattainable! thank you!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 08:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • It is attainable for non-French because they pay full tuition. They're probably more in demand than some of the FRENCH families!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.09.09, 01:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • and even then you have no hope. many a billionaire's child have the rejected.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.01.09, 03:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Well, they want French billionaires and people recommended to them by their board members. It's become very cliquey

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.01.09, 03:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • we are both non french and not wealthy. no connections. we were admitted. it happens.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Lycee's college placement (American & European) is 3rd tier. Having said that, if you're not French it's impossible to get in (there are more French people in NYC that want Lycee than open spots)

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.01.09, 09:45 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Dwight offers the international bac, which is a different thing. It seems that you don't know much about the topic.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.01.09, 11:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • former teacher, both lycee de new york and non lycee tt. different education. your values will determine which is better. lycee students are a mile wide and in inch deep -- everything is taught with a thorough understanding to the whole student body, but pushing ahead/independent thought is not as nurtured. the us education pushes children to to their best in their own interests, but lets slide the items that are less interesting for individuals, so some students slip through the cracks or end up an inch wide and a mile deep.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:27 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • It seems pretty easy to get into to me, it was our back-up, but partially because it is so big.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • LOL, you're funny. We can debate the merits of the Lycee's program, but one thing that is a fact is that it is NOT easy to get into.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.08.09, 03:49 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • It is if you know a board member or give them $$$. That's how many of the people I know got their kids in. It wasn't always this way. For example 7-8 yrs ago they had more space in the lower levels so easier to get into. Now it's harder and plus they're hurting for $$$ so they prefer rich people. It's more competitive for the French families because they can get gov't funding. Non-French have to be able to afford tuition which means they are relatively rich and well-to-do to start with. None of this is any indication that LYCEE is a good school btw

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.09.09, 01:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • agreed that being hard to get into does not equate a good school, but your post just proves that it is NOT easy to get into lfny as most people do not "know a board member or give them $$$". would be the same story at any school.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.09.09, 08:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Their college placement is never going to be as good as other schools because they are not preparing American students for American universities. My french friend went through 8th grade but switched to a SS school for HS. She told me that she was really behind in 9th grade but it really helped prepare her for college bc everything about the french school was different - different types of tests, different expectations, etc.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 08:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I was going to say the same thing. A big percentage of their kids go back to France or other French-speaking countries. A few of them go to Ivies, but a lot of them just don't want that. So you really can't compare.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 08:19 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • According to LFNY's own stats online more than 50 % of its graduates attend US universities and not the most competitive ones either.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.07.09, 02:38 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • American w/Fr spouse. LFNY kids in primary. It's a very, very different system from the US system- more rigorous (to a fault sometimes, i think), more structured, and less 'creative.' It's also less rigorous than a typical French school. It's a great school for our DS who needs structure. She is at or above the level of most other kids her age I know in English, and on top of that she speaks fluent French. You have to be willing to accept the differences of the Fr system, have to deal with homework in a for. lang., teachers whose English isn't always great, etc. I think it's a great education, but it is clearly NOT for everybody. You have to want the bilingualism.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 08:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Looking for booster/car seat for my 2.5yr old. She is 37in. 33ish lbs. Not sure what to get, done a lot of research but don't want to buy something she will grow out of quickly and don't want to spend more than $100 or so. Consumer Rpts only has a couple seats rated. Some look like they have no sleeping head support either. Anyone love their seat? Any recs?

    25 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.16.09, 11:48 AM [ Flag ]
    • I got the Graco Nautilus for my 3.5 you. It is $179 which is obvioulsy more than you are looking to spend but I had some coupons and paid less than that. DD is very comfortable in it and the 5-point harness holds up to 65 lbs so we will use it for years. Then it converts to a high back booster and then regular booster. I know Britax has a similar seat but that is closer to $300.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:52 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I am always surprised to hear people say they don't want to spend over a certain amount. Can you really put a price on the safety of your child? The best car seats are always the most expensive but are the best for safety.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • the most expensive is NOT always the safest. There may be extra bells and whistle I do not need. I'm talking about the $200+ models. I gave the $100 limit bc I know any of the Consumer Rpt rated seats are $100 or less and they all have great ratings.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np: At 2.5yo, 37", 33 lbs she is WAY too young and small for a booster. A quality FF car seat that will last a long time, is not going to be found for $100. I think the Graco Nautilus is the best option, at under $200 it should be the last seat you need. For a plain booster, min best practice is 4yo, 40", 40 lbs and the ability to sit well in it.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I know, I'm not going to be putting her in just the booster. I just feel like she is getting uncomfortable in her current seat (Britax Roundabout) so was looking for something that would last until she is done with any type of seat need and would be willing to pay for that. I'm now leaning towards the Nautilus with all of the recs for it. Thanks! Just didn't want to buy something expensive and then a year from now have to get another damn seat :)

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Yes, once you move out of the convertible, the Graco Nautilus or the Britax Frontier are your best bets, with the Nautilus being much more reasonable. They keep dc in 5PH easily until 6yo if not longer and then convert to a belt positioning booster until booster is no longer needed!

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 12:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I typically agree with this theory with most products. Higher price = higher quality. But of course there are always exceptions. I actually believe that the Britax seats are over priced. They are safe but there are other equally safe or safer brands out there for better prices.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I did a lot of research and the best car seat for a forward facing child is the Graco Nautilus. It rates as high or higher than competing models and will let your child sit in a 5 pt harness for as long as you will want her to (there are a handful that higher weight limits but not necessarily higher height limits which is more likely to be the limiting factor for your child who sound to be average). And when she outgrows the 5 pt harness the seat converts to a safe booster with head support that will work for her until she is 10 yrs old. Great seat. My son loves it. Bonus - compartments for "toys" and a drink holder.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • 2.5 can't go in a booster. Booster is for 4 yo AND 40 lbs

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Really, a five point harness is safer for as long as possible (beyond 4 yo and 40 lbs). But I do not think anyone here is recommending a booster???

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:09 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np: but i think that OP is wondering about it and by asking for seats under $100, i think she must be looking at boosters.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • oh. ITA. no boosters for 2.5 yr old even if weight requirements on product suggest it is okay.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • There are boosters out there that are 5 point...here are the 3 Con. Rpt covers: Eddie Bauer High Back Booster (Cosco), Safety 1st Vantage Point SE High Back Booster, Cosco Summit High Back Booster, Evenflo Chase DLX see here all under $100. I know she must be in 5 point until 40lbs.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 12:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • No, 5 point boosters aren't even good enough. She needs to be in a carseat until 4 and 40 lbs

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.16.09, 12:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • All of these are high backed, convertible, 5pt harness "booster" seats. There is a lot more to it then just a booster.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.16.09, 12:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • I wouldn't call those models boosters. They convert to a booster. But they are fine as long as they offer a 5 pt harness.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.16.09, 12:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • well they all have booster in the name so I was meaning a convertible booster I guess. Sorry for the mix up.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.16.09, 12:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • np: i think that if it's 5 pt harness, it's not the kind of booster most people refer to. usually people use booster to mean "belt positioning booster"

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.16.09, 12:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • ^^also, you should leave your child rear-facing for as long as possible, not just 1 yr old / 20 lbs as has been common practice. But for this child, 2.5 y.o. and her size, forward facing is appropriate.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • When she's old enough (I think 2.5 is still a little young?) I recommend the Sunshine Kids Monterrey booster seat...we love ours. Very well made.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • what does age have to do with it? She is outgrowing the seat she is in, period. I'm looking for a convertible booster that she can use now and as a stand alone booster when the time comes.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Well, then I recommend the Sunshine Kids Monterrey booster. I think the weight requirement is 30 pounds, but they recommend waiting until 40 pounds unless child has grown out of previous seat already. Happy shopping!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Thanks all. Just ordered the Graco. $159 w/free shipping from Amazon.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 04:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]New to US and to NYC. Our daughter will apply to K next year. We took ERB at suggestion of neighbor. She did 98-99-98. Is there somewhere online to look to interpret the score in more detail? Thank you.

    19 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.16.09, 10:55 AM [ Flag ]
    • sheesh. Great score what more do you want? Wasn't there a written report? an erb is for getting into private schools, I wouldn't give it any more meaning than that.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 11:00 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • wow, what a helpful response.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 11:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • and yours is so full of information??

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 11:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I don't pretend that I am being helpful while just sneering at the OP.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 11:10 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • well, you know, I do find it a little ridiculous that one would get such a high score, which still also comes with a 1+ page report, and want more information. What's to interpret? ERB is for private school placement, and I do think it's silly to want all this other meaning out of it. Signed, mom of high scoring dc.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 11:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • op: I should have been clearer. I was hoping for an understanding of how the scoring acutally works. I see the matrix/bar chart/etc. but I'm interested in the psychometrics (sp?) of the actual test.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.16.09, 11:46 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • NP: why? I mean your kid got a nearly perfect score. Why do you need to parse it?

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.16.09, 12:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • The report and accompanying materials should explain it. Bottom line is your child did very well. If you have further questions, I would ask your PSD

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.16.09, 12:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • op: What's a PSD? We just moved here from out of the country. W/ regard to parsing it, that's not what I'm asking but I'll just do some research. I'm not interested in understanding my child's score, particularly - I'm interested in understanding how the test itself is developed/scored/etc. It's just out of personal interest. I used to work in school data in my country and would like to understand it here. Apparently, however, I can call the test center office and they can answer the question. Thank you though.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.16.09, 12:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Upset the she didn't get 99x3?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'm confused. You had your dd take a $500 test based on the suggestion of a neighbor? Is it for "practice" for next year when she's applying for K, and it'll count?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 01:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I am SO SORRY so many women here suck. Welcome to America. I promise not all moms will treat you this poorly. Congratulations on the score!! If you want to drill down, ERB will, for a fee, sit down with you and give you more detail about the psychometrics. You can also take it to a private psychologist, who can do the same thing, but ERB has notes that go beyond the "narrative" that you got, and perhaps they'll share some of that with you. Good luck! In any case, it's an excellent score.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 01:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Seriously. It's shameful that people are so nasty here when the poor OP is just asking some basic questions.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 01:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • there's an anger level here that is palpable. and sad. but hey, maybe unhappy women come here, abuse strangers, and then don't take their misery out on their children or husband. could be an upside, i suppose.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 01:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • it is an anonymous board. People are entitled to their feelings. It's frustration with erb obsession which is so present on this board. Most of these responses were posted prior to OP's explaining that she worked in the field. So, the question is not basic at all without that extra info imo

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 01:57 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • of course people are entitled to their feelings. it may be anonymous, but it's not like there aren't real people on the receiving end of all this viciousness. i didn't know she worked in the field and didn't care. who cares if it's a basic question or an advanced question, OP is a person with a question and she deserves to have it answered (or not) without getting shit from mean people.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 02:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • there is maybe, like, one vicious response here. Most of it is snark, which you can just ignore if you like. I thought it ridiculous at first with scant information, after which receiving I posted no more. I think it is you who are upping the emotional ante here.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 02:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'm confused when you say "next year"... do you expect that your daughter will start K in 2010? If yes, you've got to snap-to-it to apply! If not, why did she take the ERB this year and not next (she'll just have to take it again)?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 02:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Ok, so to all of you who think I should pay my nanny AGAIN for last week's money which has been lost, what do you think I should say when I give it to her? Does anyone think it's ok to give her the money in lieu of all/party of her holiday bonus? (again bearing in mind that I already paid her and I'm certain of that) TIA.

    40 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.16.09, 12:17 PM [ Flag ]
    • I think you should say - I don't know what happened to the money, but since I trust you and you say you didn't get it, here it is again. In the future, I am going to hand off the money to you directly so this issue doesn't happen again. It is absolutely NOT okay to count this against her bonus.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ^^and if you are so certain and think nanny is taking advantage of you - FIND A NEW NANNY

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I never said she was taking advantage of me.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • But if you think she knows she lost it and she is still saying she didn't get it, then she is taking advantage of you.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • np. I agree. My nanny would tell me she may have lost it. She would feel bad. I would insist she get paid a second time. Sound slike you need a new nanny.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 12:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I understand that things get lost. Let's chalk it up to no one's fault. But it's a lot of money for me and we need a system to make sure this doesn't happen agan. (insert system). No, not okay to dock her bonus.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I don't think you pay it in lieu of part or all of her bonus. Then you are "punishing" her and implying she's lying. She may be, but if you really think so, that means you don't trust her and should fire her. What I think you should say is this "Here's your money. We both need to be more careful so this doesn't happen again. Therefore, when I give it to you each week I'm going to ask that you sign a receipt"

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ^^^PS The other scenario is that someone took it out of her purse, maybe she got pickpocketed on the subway or something. In that scenario, it might be her "fault" because she didn't have her purse closed, but she may not be "lying" and might also explain why she didn't discover til the next day. Just a thought

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • OP-- that is what I think happened, btw. And, why I don't think I should pay.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • NR- If you are ABSOLUTELY certain you paid her- are you ABSOLUTELY certain she is not lying about this? Also, a family member could have taken it out of her purse. Is she accusing YOU of not paying her or is she just saying she lost it?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • She is very meek. She isn't accusing me of anything. Just saying she doesn't remember seeing it and knows that she does not have it now. I feel terrible.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 12:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • NP: If my nanny's paycheck were stolen, I would still repay her (and not take it out of her bonus). I can afford the double payment, she can't afford to miss a week's pay.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • ? But it is not a matter of repaying her- it is a matter of giving her a bonus because she was robbed- which it doesn't seem the OP is into.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.16.09, 12:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I would think of it as more a matter of helping out the person that cares for your children when they've caught a bad break they can't afford. But I agree that the OP

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.16.09, 12:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • ^^^the OP's not into that mindset, which is why she's so puzzled by the responses she's getting.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.16.09, 12:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • You continue to say that you don't think you should pay her so then don't, just be prepared for her to find a new family to work for.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Op- by the way, I do think that is what happened.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Look, do you like/value/want to keep her or not? Think big picture. If you think she's deceiving you, then that's a different calculation.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Tell her your options: I can just pay you if you are certain that I did not put the envelope in your purse, or I can split the cost with you and take 1/2 week salary out of your bonus if your not sure. Give her the option of taking the high road, but still getting paid. (if you are paying her in cash like this she probably isnt making much and wont beable to pay bills/eat without that money.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • In your other post, I said that you shouldn't pay her again, but after re-reading your post I changed my mind. Your system of paying her by putting it in her wallet is horrible. YOu need to hand it to her every week, and then it's not your responsibility. Your system was faulty, so you unfortunately have to pay the price. Next time, she doesn't get the benefit of the doubt, but then you should also start handing it to her. How much are we talking about, anyway???

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ^^^ sorry, I meant the system of putting it in her purse is horrible

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • ita. you are an employer. you need to act professionally. How you pay her is up to you. She needs a check, or you need to hand it to her and have her count it. She probably lives paycheck to paycheck- loosing a paycheck is huge to her.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Yes, OP, how much are we talking about??

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • A week's salary. Several hundred dollars.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 12:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Is that really that much for you? Because it is probably a lot to her. If she is only making "several" hundred dollars, she is probably underpaid as well.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.16.09, 12:50 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I see another side to the story. Yes it should be docked from her pay b/c it was wrong of her to not check her bag before she left, especially since she had not remembered seeing it at all. She needs to learn to be a little more responsible when it comes to large amounts of money, especially if you really can't afford to pay her for 2 weeks. You can just say "I don't know what happened to the money I gave you but since I can not afford to pay you for 2 weeks I am giving you part of your Christmas bonus now. From now on I want to hand you the money as well."

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I'm sorry, I think you're confused about the details. This is the OP's nanny, not her child.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.16.09, 12:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I understand perfectly well that it's the nanny but it was irresponsible of her to not check her bad before she left since she obviously didn't remember seeing it.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.16.09, 01:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Housekeeper (NOT THE SAME THING, I know) did this to me after I DID hand it off to her. I paid her again then replaced her. I was pissed. I know this is not your situation, but I feel that I was ripped off.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Big Picture: you are paying nanny in cash, and not paying taxes. I dont have any sympathy for you. Do the right thing.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:38 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Just pay her again, but say that the old system probably wasn't the best, maybe someone picked her pocket/bag and took the money out - so from now on, you're going to hand the money to her directly and from that point on, it's her responsibility to pull the zipper on her bag shut or otherwise secure it. Say that you totally trust her and know that she's completely responsible - and that the new system should be full-proof. Then if it happens again, replace her.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Wow, I always put the envelope with nanny's cash on her bag while she changes...mostly so I don't forget to give it to her...but I'm going to hand it to her from now on. Although I 100% trust my nanny to be honest (she once called me and told me I overpaid by $10).

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'd pay her again and then fire her. Hire a nanny who will let you hand her a check!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.16.09, 12:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]

Your settings

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

UrbanBaby Asks...

Are you or your partner ever naked in front of your children?

Already voted? View Results

See previous polls »