advertisement
Click Here
On TV.com: Top 15 TV THEME Songs
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]Los Angeles moms - where do you consider a great neighborhood in LA?

    6 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.03.09, 03:03 PM [ Flag ]
    • Watching this post.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.03.09, 03:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Santa Monica (city, not Blvd), north of Wilshire.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.03.09, 03:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Depends on what type of scene you're into (if you want to be by the beach or in the mountains, etc). Lot's of people love Manhattan Beach (good schools, great beaches, cute downtown). If you want beach, but more low key, Hermosa Beach or El Segundo. If you're looking for affordability, look at Playa Vista.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.03.09, 04:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • It really depends on what you are looking for. LA does not have a lot of good public schools, however, there are a few. Wonderland School is very good. It is in the Laural Canyon/Laural Hills area. The houses in this area are more affordable than in other areas (that is relative, of course but with RE crashing there are "bargins") and there are a lot of young families who are very involved in the school. It is small and very well maintained. There are a lot of mid-century homes in the area and there is probably more diversity (both ethnic,financial and professional) in that area than in any other area of LA. As I write, I realize that I would highly recommend this area if you are moving from NY. I'm from NY and just remember, LA is n...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 11:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • if you need a RE agent in the Laural Canyon area post it here. I have an excellent reference for someone who helped us find a rental when we first moved to LA.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 11:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Became friends with another mom at the program dc attends. We've started getting together outside of class. I'm sort of feeling awkward about having them over to my place, though, as we're in quite a different economic bracket. In principle, I don't care...but I guess, emotionally, I feel embarrassed at how little we have in comparison to them. She won't care, right?

    14 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.19.09, 08:34 AM [ Flag ]
    • You can't actually be friends if you need to posture.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I say start off completely tranparent. Be open and real, and see if she's the kind of friend who likes you for you!If you try too hard to 'keep up' or if you don't present yourself honestly, it'll just be too much to work on....

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • she totally wont care

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • why don't you get to know her a little better and then you will feel more comfortable having her over eventually. continue with lunches/dinners out for now.it's about you feeling comfortable.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • why don't you rent a fancy place just for the day?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • BTDT - We live in a small apt, non-doorman bldg, DC has friends living on Park and 5th. Young DCs will say what they think without filtering and that's OK. They come over here, DCs have fun, and their mothers have never said a negative thing, my photos hanging on our walls where they have real, gorgeous paintings have brought lovely compliments, the bag of my knitting sitting in a corner brings questions about how I learned and what I'm making. If they are nice people, they will not embarrass you, and you shouldn't feel ashamed of how you live. If they aren't nice people, you don't want them for friends anyway.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITA, although it is hard to be in the position of having less.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 09:05 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • It is hard sometimes. The first time I visited one DCs home, I almost swallowed my tongue - our entire apartment could fit in their living room. You just have to focus on what's good in your life, as hard as that can be. For me, it's that we may have a small home, but it's filled with love, laughter and really good food.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 09:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • She won't care, or at least she shouldn't. I'm a mom who is self-conscious over how big our place is, but because of the size, we usually have the play dates at our place. I absolutely wouldn't care AT ALL if someone's place is smaller/less glam that ours. At all.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 09:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I don't understand why the $ factor seems to be an issue. If you get along with them, who cares who has what. I don't think it's really an issue.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 09:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • It's an emotional response, not necessarily rational. It's a little bit of jealousy, mixed in with some embarrassment. You want to believe that it doesn't matter, but you know that it does, at least sort of. People judge others based on all sorts of information, good and bad, rightly or wrongly, including their address and you are lying to yourself if you think otherwise. So what you do is be open about your situation and do your best to make other people comfortable around you (that's what good manners are all about).

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 10:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • We are in a similiar situation. While we earn 250K, have graduate degrees, travel and own, we are always the "poor" ones in the group. But I knew that sending my dc to a private would mean just that. We usually plan playdates at museums, parks or around an activity. We have managed to avoid having people over to our small walk-up, but I do talk about our "small" apartment freely.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 09:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • When we moved to the city from FL, we had an embarrassingly small apartment here. No one cared. Everyone in NY was cool with our small apartment. But in FL, there was MUCH more snobbery about living situation. At leas that's what I found. The more worldly people are, the less snobby. At least the NY snobs have real money, which isn't the case for the FL snobs!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 09:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • We live in an apartment that I find very comfortable (1400 sq ft, 2 BR/2BA) in a postwar doorman bldg on the far east UES. Still, dc plays at many homes that are much bigger and fancier and in far more luxury building in higher end neighborhoods. And those kids will come to our apartment also. I'm sure that at some point I will come accross the parent who thinks that coming east of 1st is akin to the South Bronx circa 1985, but that hasn't happened yet. Unfortunately, I think too many people are pretending to be far more affluent than they are and apartment size/type can kind of "out" them. Get over it.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 10:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Berkeley Carroll or Brooklyn Friends?

    30 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.18.09, 06:18 PM [ Flag ]
    • Don't know much about them, other than a few families at each, all of whom are very nice

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • FWIW, appears Larry Weiss will likley be new head of school at Brooklyn Friends, if that helps your decision.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Similar reputations: will challenge kids who are bright and highly motivated, but also a haven for the bright kids who aren't academic stars. Geography matters: do you want your kid in Park Slope or Downton/Brooklyn Heights? Also, BF is Quaker, for those who consider that important.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • my experience with BFS is that they seem to want to over-diagnose learning problems, and there is too much misbehavior in the lower school (and these issues might be related, kids getting away with nonsense because people think they have some kind of problem?), that was our experience anyway

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • what exactly is a bright kid who is not an academic star?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Brooklyn Friends has the International Baccalaureate in the high school.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • and a very low rate of passing, lots of frustrated dcs, still working out the glitches but maybe if your dc is young it will be working more smoothly by the time your dc gets there

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • They are completely different schools/locations. We sent 3 dcs to BCS two through 12th grade the third a bit less. BCS is the more aggressive academically and guidance is superior. Where do you live? Have you seen Bklyn Friends location? It really all depends on your family, dcs' personality/strengths etc and location. You can't go too far wrong with either. My dcs went to Ivy league colleges so I don't get the comment about "stars" lol

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 07:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • check out the BFS web site, they get FEW Ivy placements, most often NONE admitted to HYP or any of the biggest name colleges

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITD with "can't go wrong" comment, you CAN go wrong, do your research!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Lived in Brooklyn for 23 years! Did my research! Results are that my opinion is you can't go wrong here if you make your decision based on the factors that I mentioned! OK?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 07:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I like you.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 06:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • what a dumb comment -- there is some extremely defensive person on here who gets upset whenever any parent dishes on any school. I wonder if this is the person, praising the poster who seems to want to indicate the schools are all basically equivalent (which they are NOT)

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.19.09, 09:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • If you base your decision on research and the qualitative factors that are unique to your dcs ita these are both good schools just intended for slightly different students.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 07:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • thank you!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 07:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • different in what way? Are you trying to say BC is for academically stronger kids? We went wrong by NOT checking college placement, sent ds to BFS when we would have been better at BCS. Had to xfer out later, classes were not challenging enough at BFS for my ds. OTOH for lower grades we were more attracted to BFS for social reasons.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 08:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • some people think BFS is good for kids with LDs, and I heard about a dc who recently left BCS lower grades as xfer to BFS.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 09:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • one year two kids xfered in from the same SN school in Manhattan, I think they arrived for 7th or 8th grade at brooklyn friends

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.19.09, 09:22 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • This is a rude question (so don't answer if you don't care to), but WHICH ivy? If it was HYP then that would be more common outcome at BCS as opposed to BFS, where it seems QUITE rare, if one has seen their college placement for the past few years. I think they have had more success with the less prominent ivy colleges (getting a handful of kids in over a 5 yr period). Still, I think college placement at BFS is weak relative to other privates in NYC, and schools like BCS and Packer are more on par with Manhattan privates in this regard, with significantly stronger college placement stats. These considerations are silly IMO when the kids are 5, but they do grow in importance as the kids reach middle school and high school. In the same way, i...

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.19.09, 09:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • college placement could improve under a HOS like LW. All the more reason to ignore it if you are choosing a school for your 5 yo now.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.19.09, 09:08 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I think the Quaker philosophy is wonderful and offsets a weaker college record, for a young applicant

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.19.09, 09:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]School psychologist keeps pushing for us to do an evaluation, without giving me a clear reason why. Child is happy, likes to go to school, makes friends, brings art home. I think they just pinned me, he's only 3.5, what’s their problem? I'm furious.

    96 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.10.09, 12:30 PM [ Flag ]
    • Take your kid to ped for referral if you're pushed further; do NOT use anyone recommended by your dc's school.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 12:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I can see why you would be upset, but why would you hesitate to have your child tested if a school psych requested it? Or are you suspicious bc the school psych is hte one who wants to do the testing? Go and find your own tester, but don't be close-minded.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 12:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Surely you must have been told why.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 12:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ita. what does school psych say is the issue? also, ita for outside tester.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 12:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OP - no. They want to have a meeting in a week so tehy can come up with a coherent argument. Spent 30 minutes on the phone, all was general normal behavior for a 3 yo.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 12:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • normal to you? what did psych argue was not that you think is fine. i will prob agree with you.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 12:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I think this is a very difficult conversation for a school psych, even if it is their job. Look at how you are taking it. My friend was blind-sided when her preschool suggested this apt. Now her guy has excellent state-paid care and is excelling.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 12:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • BTDT mom, first time posting on this thread. If your mommy instinct says they are fos, they are fos. Do not cave. Stand up and protect your child. It's hard, but it is worth it.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 03:02 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • OP - he doesn't need one. I can take him to another school next year, it's preschool not Harvard. I am not evaluating a perfectly normal, happy, friendly kid.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 12:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • but did the psych give a reason? find it hard to believe that he/she didn't.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 12:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Wow. How can you say that? I'm going through the K process with my 4 yo and have NO IDEA if she is gifted. I think she's super-smart, but recognize I'm her mom and my opinion is 100% biased. If her school told me to have her tested for weird hair color, I would do it. Why are you so close-minded?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 12:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • OP - it's not about him being smart. he had language delays (exposed to 3 languages from birth, English not one of them) and now he can speak English (speech therapy). Except for that - he is normal, happy, on point with every milestone. He likes to run sometimes, but he's a kid. Not saying he's gifted, but he knows colors, shapes, numbers, ABC and does 48 pieces puzzles. He has friends, we do playdates, he's warm and affectionate, and yes, sometimes runs, shouts, but all in normal range. He eats well, sleeps well, talks a lot, all in all - normal. They could not give me a good reason, except for him being immature sometimes. Seriously, he's a toddler!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 12:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • He does sound normal. Why do you think he was singled out. Honestly?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.10.09, 12:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • OP - I think ot started with the language delay and they're just eager to find more issues, honestly, not sure why. He's happy in that school, coems home happy, has friends, can't imagine what they want.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.10.09, 12:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I had language-delayed kids and went through this nightmare. I even almost flew to Vanderbilt to see the Camaratas. I switched schools to one my mellow off-the-books speech therapist recommended and they are caught up at 4. No intervention necessary and you should have HEARD the concerns I was harassed with. Good luck.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.10.09, 12:50 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • OP - I hear you. And he catches up pretty well, why not focus on what's really wrong and not invent more.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.10.09, 12:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • well, there's your answer. He was on their radar. Go to the meeting (with an open mind) and then decide. BTW, not sure what having friends and being happy have to do with it..i would hope that all kids have at least that..

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.10.09, 12:51 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • OP - a problematic kid does not interact well sometimes, not happy, has no friends. He loves going to school, he has a good experience there, so not sure why he is on their radar.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.10.09, 12:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • "on his radar" from the speech therapy, was all I meant. I'm sure its fine. Which is why I woud investigate, and then make your decision. ggood luck.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.10.09, 01:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • NP - looks like they climbed a high tree. Sometimes they try and be smart when they think they have a problematic one, trigger happy, too bored. Ignore them, don't do it, if your guts tells you not too. you know your child best. A psych that watches him for an hours can write all types of mumbo jumbo that is pure bullshit.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 12:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np: I agree with you but something must have spurred this on. Just tell us. Sheesh. They didn't call to say DC is what you claim and in same breadth say he needs eval. Something is missing.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 12:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np..I'm going to guess, bc of the "perfectly normall behavior" that her guy won't sit in circle-time, is a little too touchy, or agressive, and has some listening issues in school. Moms of boys tend to think this is normal behaviour, for boys.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 12:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • np: i would agree with that, for a 3 yo.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.10.09, 12:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • you must have a boy. And for the most part it's fine, except when its not..and the school psych gets involved. one rowdy toddler disrupts the whole circle..

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.10.09, 12:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Still, normal. Not an army, not adults. normal.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.10.09, 12:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • NP: One rowdy toddler being disruptive in class is now a pathological event that requires a psych evaluation?

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.10.09, 12:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • i think that it is normal 3 yo boy behavior, and i also think that not all preschools are set up to deal with normal 3 yo boy behavior. i made sure to find one that was, but i have had friends who had miserable experiences at other schools because they were set up in a way in which normal boy behavior could really screw up the day's plan for everybody.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.10.09, 12:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • YES. And it turns out that they told three of us mothers (out of an age group of 7 students) that our boys were absolutely unmanageable.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.10.09, 12:51 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • i have heard this from a lot of my friends. you already know you are not alone, but you should know that there are MANY of you out there! and it's not your kids that are the problem!

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.10.09, 01:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • NP: ITA - had exact same experience. For some reason, preschool teachers are not interested in implementing basic discipline. DC was at great preschool, which also pushed for evaluation when he was 3,5. Example that they gave me (in preschool teacher talk): "DC needs help, he "can't calm his body down", sometimes he will start jumping up and down in classroom and his classmates will start doing the same". It finally dawned on me that it was an authority issue, not DC's "body"'s problem. That evening, we had a discussion with DC, telling him that there would be consequences at home if we heard that he didn't follow teachers'instructions: problem SOLVED. We did bring him to OT, just because my wife insisted, and OT was just flabbergasted, had...

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.10.09, 06:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • you must not have a boy. also sounds like you haven't read the literature on boy development and education. schools need to work with both boys and girls and speak to their strengths/normal development.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.10.09, 12:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • Listen, I agree with you. And I really agree with the posts above. The reality is, a lot of little boys should not be in circle-time at 3 years old. It doesn't work for them. They aren't ready. So while I am not condoning a psych intervention, I don't htink it's fair that a classroom or preschoolers is disrupted, not once, but everyday, by a rowdy three year old whose parents never trained him to sit for 15 minutes of circle-time. He could wait a year for preschool. All of the parents in that classroom are paying money.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.10.09, 12:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • but it doesn't stop there. kids are being evaluated, medicated, sent to spec ed schools, etc from preschool on. it is an education crisis in this country. personally, I don't think kids in the preschool are being harmed by the kid who gets up during circle time. at age 3, they could care less. even later. we all had a class clown and we survived...parents' money still well spent. the push for perfectly calm kids in the classroom is unrealistic and does more harm than good.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.10.09, 12:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • ita, signed former special ed teacher.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.10.09, 01:01 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • You are writing this as a parent who clearly had a child who acted this way. As a parent of a well-behaved 3 yo, I can tell you that as soon as your 3yo gets up at circle-time nad goes to play with the toy truck, my 3yo wants to go too. They do care. And my kids teacher does say it's an issue. It is VERY hard to get 15 kids to sit.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.10.09, 01:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • Np: You know what, then the school should ask the parents to look elsewhere, not try to label the kid so they can get a state-funded minder to sit by him in circle time.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        11.10.09, 01:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • i think this conversation has spiraled. no one said this kid needs a seit. they just suggested an eval. really.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.10.09, 01:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • NP: Isn't that the whole point of PREschool - to teach DC the skills they will need when they start real school?

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        11.10.09, 02:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Yes! It is. And you know what, that is also the goal of K Gasp. If you send a child to K in nyc that has not already had years and years of school the teachers are completely lost. It is sad. Very sad.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.10.09, 03:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • oy with the fairness argument already!

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.10.09, 01:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • it is normal boy behavior generally. good for OP. we did the eval thing. ds found to have very high IQ (topped out most subtests) good attention etc. just full of ideas.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.10.09, 12:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • It IS NORMAL.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.10.09, 12:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • ita. i used to teach special ed pre school and while most kids belonged there, there were some that just needed more structure/positive modeling - not saying that is OP's ds, but, rather, that not every issue needs major interventions.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.10.09, 12:51 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • OP here - not disruptive at all. Specifically asked if he was "problematic", and they said no.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.10.09, 12:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Is the person you're referring to named Ron, by any chance?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 12:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • np: why are you "furious". Just see what they have to say (I agree: find your own tester). If he is really as normal as you say, that's the report you will get. If there is some issue of which you are not aware, you can be thankful that it was raised. Early interventions do lead to much more successful resolution of issues and parents, no matter how attentive, are not around to see and diagnose it all.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 01:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • The statistics are by no means clear on that. The reason it may look like early intervention results in better outcomes is that it catches children who may not have any true pathology and they outgrow these issues, thus skewing the rates.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 01:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • possibly true, but it is not EI is not harmful. At worst, it is just not necessarily needed. At best, it could really make a positive difference in a child's life

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 01:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Depends on what they do. Some evidence suggests that ABA (and some other 'interventions') on a child who is not on the spectrum and simply has a speech delay will further inhibit speech development. Just because they are not pills does not mean that they are necessarily harmless.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.10.09, 01:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • OP, I totally agree with you. Do not go get your tiny boy labeled, potentially for life, just because a counselor decided to tag him as the latest opportunity for the school to get more state funding. I believe in the power of suggestion. Don't let your little one think that he is anything but normal. Personally, I would get him out of the school right now if I did not think there was any validity to their claim. You know him best. If you are being totally honest that he is normal and happy, don't bend.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 01:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Agree--he sounds very normal (like a BOY!), and don't th ink you should let the school push you around.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 02:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • who is pushing anyone around? The school made a suggestion based on what they, in fact, see. And to say an evaluation is labelling for life is nuts. If there is nothing wrong, no reputable doctor will find something (there are like a half dozen very top developmental peds in NYC)

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 03:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I'm going to second this and I'm here to say that I am a mom that did just that, and my child is several grade levels ahead academically and socially fine 3 years later. The preschool/k teacher have gone MAD.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 03:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I would say I definitely think you should not evaluate him, since you deserve the regret you may have when you find out something could have been done to save him serious problems later. However, as he is a child, I will only say I hope for his sake you are not always so blind. Whether or not he will have issues requiring intervention, he will have to live with you and your refusal to see that your child may need help sometimes or not be perfect.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 01:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • NP: OMG, don't you get tired carrying that cross around all the time? I feel really sorry for the poor family who has to live with someone so self-righteous. She deserves the regret she may have, huh? She is blind? It must be nice to be omniscient!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 01:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I am hoping desperately that your child is able to survive the pathologizing of his childhood.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 01:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ewhhh, are you like this in real life?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 01:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • actually, sn mom who did not believe anything was wrong with her beautiful, happy child. Not that anything in this post screams that, but finding out years later when some simple therapy might have had a huge effect is HARD. A mom's gut is always right, right?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.10.09, 02:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • np: the stuff about schools wanting evals or for their kids to have problems to get money is completely insane. How warped do you have to be against the mere possibility that a child may have an issue? If you feel this way, shell out the big bucks and get a private eval. No one will be the wiser, excellent doctors around and NO interest in diagnosing something that is not there.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.10.09, 02:18 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • NNP: I would be against the mere possibility of my DC having an "issue" if no one could articulate for me what they thought that issue was! Shouldn't the school psychologist be able to explain to the OP exactly why he's flagging her DS?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.10.09, 02:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • np. no. The school psychologist is likely a low paid, psychologist with merely a masters who can spot problems. A phD can eval the child and articulate what the school psych, whol likely makes $30k a year is pickin up on. really.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.10.09, 06:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • these tend to be asd diagnoses, so people can max services. There is no liability in over diagnoses only unders so people over diagnose

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.10.09, 07:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • i understand that must be incredibly hard. but your situation is not necessarily OP's, and that was a very strongly worded post! i think you could have shared your experience without berating her.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.10.09, 02:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I agree that OR was harsh, but also agree that the pervading attitude on UB that there cannot be something wrong with "my" child--which, to reach an extreme, extends to the overwhelming shock and disappointment parents convey when there child scores 80s ERB, which is in fact still better than over 80% of the entire country--is a source of great dismay (I would say disgust, but then would be flamed for being as harsh as OR). Parents seem really to have too much of a stake in their kids being perfect, and in fact no kids are.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.10.09, 03:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • i would argue that the desire for their kids to be perfect pushes some kids into therapy who don't need it. don't get me wrong, anything that actually benefits children is fine by me. but there are many parents in nyc who seek evaluations for the things you are talking about--not acing some stupid test, or not being at the top of the class. while parents should be responsive towards problems their kids may be having, i also think it's important not to treat every stumble as something that needs attention from a specialist.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.10.09, 03:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • hmmm, do you think they have asked all the kids in the class to have an eval? Or have thought, we have a quote of x evals to ask for per class, so let's fulfill it by asking this guy who doesn't really seem to need it? Or, this guy cannot sit still for circle time, let's get him an evaluation since we have no background in development and don't know that a 3 year old might get up from circle time, thus we use this sole issue as a basis on which to request an eval? Let's pin this one! Mother seems like the type that it would be fun to give her a dig!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 02:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Find out what they have to say. I'm a 3s teacher and trained in Special Ed. By the way, I think it's nutty to think a school would try to have a child evaluated just to get "extra government paid help". A SEIT doesn't really help anyone in the class but the child receiving services. The SEIT would be reporting back anyway about the child's needs and progress. This isn't a conspiracy, folks.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 02:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I am a mother of a child with a SEIT in a private preschool. You must not have any experience with SEiTs because your description is completely wrong. The SEIT is there to help one child, but she must intergrate herself into the classroom and she actually served as a teacher to every student in the class and the students are never aware that she is not a teacher for all the students. I have to say, I originallly worried that they pushed for it to get extra free help too, now I don't care because she has helped dc so much and became my eyes and ears in the classroom, it is a great resource.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 02:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Bunk! Every SEIT I know (and I am one) blends in to teh classroom and helps many students. You are in a word: wrong.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 03:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Look, OP, i get how upset you are. we were blindsided when preschool told us we should have DC evaluated for sensory issues. we never saw any of the behavior they were describing at home. But DC can be different at school and you may not be seeing what they are concerned about. We had DC evaluated private by someone we trusted and not recommended by the school and there were issues. Also, once we talked with the OT we realized that we did see the behaviors at home but just not as pronounced as at school where DC was having trouble focusing and concentrating. stuff we thought was normal 3 or 4 y/o silliness and rambunctiousness really had an underlying cause other than being just a 3 or 4 y/o. it can NOT hurt to have DC privately evaluated. ...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 02:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • THANK YOU.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 06:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • but how do you know really? the behaviors were so minor as not to be noticable by you at home. getting more rambunctious at school doesn't mean he has a medical condition. have seen so many kids with sensory balls and little seats in preschool. doesn't seem to help much from my experience and makes them seem abnormal.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 08:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • private evaluations are very expensive, and often lead to much anxiety and upset, not to mention the problem of over diagnosis and labeling, mistreatemnt of normal behavior, etc. parents often start to see their dcs as abnormal or different. I think you discount the harm this mill of evaluations "just in case" is creating.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.10.09, 08:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • He is only 3 now, but sensory issues can effect future success in school. If he does have some small issues, he could be helped now for everyone's benefit. Getting angry about this isn't helpful. They see many children every day and your data point is one. You need a third party view point that is thoughtful.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Without informing us, our nsd is sending pictures our kids draw to the school psychologist who then "diagnoses" our children (and parents)through a drawing, without the benefit of either child or parental interview. The nsd feeds the psychologist family information, takes notes on her comments and they go into the child's record. This bothers me for many reasons. One, this is done without our consent. Two, drawing interpretation is hotly debated in the psychology field and I don't like our children being made guinea pigs. Three, what mother hasn't received a shocking drawing from dc which after questioning, is clearly innocent artistic attempt? Are all the nurseries doing this?

    37 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.18.09, 06:37 AM [ Flag ]
    • Any psychologist who does an evaluation of a child without the parent's consent should be sued for malpractice.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • is the school psychologist on staff?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Epiphany Community Nursery School does this on a regular basis.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • what they do is look for learning and social issues, not diagnose through drawing. they do inform the parents they are doing this.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 06:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Not at ecns. One mother found out b/c records were subpoenaed for a custody battle.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 06:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • parents are informed that the psychologist sees the children and makes evaluations. the child's "record" is meaningless. if the psychologist sees something of concern, the parents are informed. if she doesn't, parents hear nothing.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 07:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • How could "prostitute" (see below) appear on a 4yo record and not mean anything?!?! If the record is meaningless, why is it recorded? The psychologist wasn't concerned after mentioning "prostitute" ? This parent claims she was never informed. Was its sole purpose to harass this mother?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 07:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • i wouldn't send my child to a school that's looking for issues.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 07:07 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • bc if your child has issues you'd rather put your head in the sand and not know about them? then you have people complain that if there was a problem "you'd think the teachers would ahve noticed". schools try to be proactive, bc it's better to discover these things in preschool and attend to them, then to have them come out in elementary school and be trying to correct for them.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 07:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • what i meant was that good preschool teachers should be able to spot the red flags. sending pictures to psychologists is looking for trouble.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 07:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • does it occur to anyone that teachers express concerns and schools want to take the "heat" away from the teachers and put it on the school psych bc that way when parents have complaints or tirades, it's not the teacher who is blamed?

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.18.09, 07:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • The psych. from ecns predicted one 4yo would become a prostitute b/c she drew circles for boobs on her older sisters and a little loop at her crotch. Turned out it was sore from riding her new bike and her sisters do indeed have breasts.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 06:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Creepy!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • wow that's pretty bizarre. you can learn a lot looking at the pictures kids draw, but it's really open to interpretation and only valuable in conjunction with a thorough look at the child and family. any psych worth anything would know that you can't diagnose a kid based on a picture.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 07:05 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The nsd at ECNS targeted a mother in a custody battle. She sided with the father who has $$$ and has abused this woman in countless ways over two years. She showed me the notes and her dd drawing. Wendy Levy fed the psychologist lies that could only have come from the father, who was launching similar attacks against the mother with other professionals involved. This mother was not told anything by Wendy or the psychologist, she got the notes in subpoenaed documents and had to press Wendy to send the drawing. Wendy Levy nsd, Michele Asher Dunne psychologist and the father (nameless only to protect the child) are all culpable. Repulsive behavior by these three against a good mother fighting for joint custody against a multi-millionaire who...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 07:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • you keep posting this story on UB and clearly you are on the mom's side, but the fact is that this is ONE extraordinary situation and I imagine as with all things there are 2 sides to the story. if parents are going through such an ugly divorce, i am not suprised that the school psych is involved!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Actually, my first post. There must be other parents concerned about the attacks on this mother.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 07:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Levy was probably sleeping with the DH - or wished she was

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Had to be a wish. Who would touch that old bag?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 07:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • if i show my dh this thread, he will def. tell me all bets are off for sending dc to private nursery. ewww. we don't want out child exposed to materialistic, lying, woman abusing people.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 10:33 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • lol. Yes, those kind of people are ONLY at private nurseries in nyc. Numskull.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 10:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • From what I read, ecns nsd can act this way because she has no oversight via a board of directors. She apparently owns the school and runs it as a not for profit (I looked it up).Sounds like a loose canon to me. Avoid this school. Mine and many others are professionally run and offer great pre-K education.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 04:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I have no horse in this race, but you should be more careful about what you are posting here. You could be sued for libel. More importantly, as awful as this whole situation sounds (if true), publishing/disseminating it further than it has already been does more harm than good for everyone involved.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 10:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • My point is to expose this nsd for unethical and illegal behavior. She should not be doing what she is doing - at any school. We have children at other schools, the head of one of them is familiar with the situation and disgusted by Wendy Levy's voluntary involvement in the legalities between these two and her behavior towards this mother.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 04:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Wendy Levy is one of the few in the private school system who will get involved in divorces and willingly participate. I think she likes it, maybe it makes her feel powerful? This is not her first time.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 05:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • lol. get your kid into Epiphany if you want a divorce. donate to Wendy so she will help you win. sick actually but my dc is there and i know this mother casually from pu do. she seems solid. the father i only met once at the class cocktail party. he got drunk. his girlfriend was confused with the mother by appearance. very odd. wendy does pick on the mother. i noticed her following the mother around first day of school. heard later wendy wrote her an email blasting her for talking to people she didn't want her to talk to.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 05:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Are you sure that this is actually happening? Have you approached both people about it? A professional psychologist will not do any type of "analysis" without speaking with the parents first. In a classroom setting they will observe all of the children in order to try and help the teachers and staff manage the classes better, though. If what you say is true, that would be really shocking (and illegal).

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:03 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • it is not illegal to have a professional evaluate children if parents are notified, even if the notification is not as obvious as most people would like. she might be concerned that one child is not integrating properly into the class or that another child has a problem controlling emotions or whatever. parents sometimes don't see these things or don't recognize their significance. would you want to know?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • She said that she did not give her consent. That is illegal! That is why it is difficult for me to believe. If my own child's teachers were concerned, I would certainly want to follow up. But parents must give consent before an assessment.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 10:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • having a psychologist observe a classroom is fine, I would want to know if my dc had a problem. the above report is not ok because the mother was not notified of any problems. any mention of "prostitute" on a 4yo file would be a red flag and both parents, regardless of their legalities, should be contacted to help the child.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 05:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Good point. NSD didn't try to help the family after gathering the illegal or otherwise information.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 05:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • A friend told me about this post. I assure you the ECNS comments are only inaccurate in their lightness. The activities of the nsd are far worse than shared here.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]

Your settings

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

UrbanBaby Asks...

Are you or your partner ever naked in front of your children?

Already voted? View Results

See previous polls »