advertisement
On ZDNet: How low can quad-core go?
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]my sons are 6 and 8 and i still shower with them. they are oblivious. anything wrong with that?

    74 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.09.09, 04:08 PM [ Flag ]
    • They are not oblivious. It seems that you, on the other hand, are. They are too old for this. I think you know this.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • no i don't know - it's why i'm asking... what is the downside?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 04:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • It's too sexually stimulating for them. Even if the context isn't sexual. You don't need to make a big deal out of it, just phase it out.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 04:18 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • ok. good point. thx.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.09.09, 04:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • sexually stimulating? I think I'm going to disagree on this one.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.09.09, 04:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Disagree, how is it not?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.09.09, 04:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • i am going to disagree with the 'sexually stimulating' person as well. kids aren't cognizant of sexuality at 6.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.09.09, 05:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • np: me too. i don't think seeing your mom naked is at all sexually stimulating. it may get embarrassing for them, but i wouldn't worry about sexual stimulation!

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.09.09, 04:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • How about confusing? Is that a more comfortable way to think about it?

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.09.09, 04:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • What do you think would be confusing about it? I would never shower with my son. I would feel horribly awkward about it, and by the time he got to 8 I'm pretty sure it would be embarrassing for him. But I'm not sure what would be confusing about it for him?

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.09.09, 04:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • np: It would be confusing for the same reasons you would feel horribly awkward and he would be embarrassed.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.09.09, 04:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • I won't be embarrassing unless you have brought him up to see the human body as something to be embarrassed about. You need to make it out to be perfectly natural, then there will be no problems.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    11.13.09, 08:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • Children have a natural sense of modesty that often manifests itself around 6 or 7. It's natural for a child to feel embarrassed/want to be private with their (and other's) nakedness. It doesn't mean that nakedness=source of shame. You need to respect their own sense of self and modesty. Personally, I think 6 and 8 is pushing it for communal showering.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      11.17.09, 05:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • Modesty often does "manifest itself around 6 or 7", but it certainly isn't "natural". It is something that, by 6 or 7 has been beat into them by much of society; TV, friends, school, other adults, etc. etc. The best thing a parent can do is to counter that by word and example and leave it up to them to make their own decisions as they get older.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        11.19.09, 08:10 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • I disagree. If anything society teaches immodesty. We have been very open with our children regarding nakedness and they still developed a sense of modesty around 6. And most pediatricians and other 'experts' agree this is natural.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.19.09, 08:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • PP: Congratulations on being open with your children. I have done the same, but it is nearly impossible when so much of society pulls the other way. Your dcs will be better off when they get to be teenagers because of your openness now.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          11.19.09, 08:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITA.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 05:57 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • My ds started to notice at 7. I still let him see me in bra and underwear, but try not to let him see me naked anymore.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OP: thanks. want to do what's right, but my parents were very open around my sisters and me, and we all have very healthy attitudes about our bodies and sex... i just wonder what the downside is. like if i start acting weird about it, doesn't that teach shame and provoke even more curiosity?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 04:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • You'll be fine. Just do what feels right for you and your family. By paying attention to it, you are already ahead of the game.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 04:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Yes. Don't act at all weird and they will not have any problems.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.13.09, 08:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I don't think so. There's nothing wrong with raising your kids to be comfortable with the human body, male or female.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • What do you mean by "oblivious?"

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • i mean they are not self-conscious about it at all.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 04:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • np: good for you. They might start to be at an older age, but they also get self-conscious about being hugged or kissed good-bye in public. It doesn't mean you stop hugging them forever, you just adjust to their comfort zone.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 04:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I think they're too old for you to do this with them anymore. Especially your eight year old. Puberty comes early these days.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 04:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • You are a sicko. I am sorry, but that is wrong. Why do 6 and 8 year olds need help in the shower? Children do not need to see their opposite gendered parent naked past the age of 3 -- read the recommendations.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • My 7 yo son got in the tub last night with my 9 yo daughter. Interestingly, they scream, laugh, and point when either of them see each other in their underwear, but they had no issue with nudity. I think if you make a big deal out of it, it will be a big deal. If you don't, it's not.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • My parents had me shower with my dad until I was 6 or so. Sunday mornings before church. My eyes were at eye level with his privates. Nothing inappropriate, ever, but it's an image I still can't get out of my head.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I tend to agree there is something sick and wrong going on here. I am wondering why op needs to be showering with her kids in the first place. OP, why are you?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np: sick and wrong? My father used to take his 4 kids on Sunday nights up to the locker room at the college where he worked, and we would all shower openly while my mom chilled at home for an hour. Granted, it was the 70's and people were a lot more open about their bodies, but c'mon, sick and wrong?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 04:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • because it's an efficient use of time - if i need a shower, and they are dirty, we get it all done - in and out in 3 minutes.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 05:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • There is nothing sexual about the naked body unless it's being used for sex. It does a lot of other things, too. If you're matter of fact and they're ok with it, I don't see the big deal. I realize I'm in the minority. That said, I leave the showering with ds to dh. I have no issues with changing clothes in front of him, tho.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • On the one hand, I think 8 is definitely a little too old for a boy to shower with mom and 6 is questionable. However, there is nothing sick or wrong about it. Nor is there anything "sexually stimulating" about it. I just think that it might be a little embarrassing at some point for your boys. If they have not expressed to you yet that they are embarrassed, then they probably aren't. So you should be able to phase it out no problem.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 04:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • What

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 04:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • If it's not sexually stimulating, then what's embarrassing about it?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 04:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Children develop a sense that it is embarrassing to be naked or see others naked. It is not necessarily sexual unless it is made to be. Many children are anxious about being nude in front of anyone - other children during gym class or at the sports club, people of the same gender, the doctor... sounds like you are over-sensitized to sex.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 04:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I doubt your kids are "oblivious'; It's more likely they're still comfortable or not overly phased. Believe me, when an 8 yo showers w/their Mama, they would DIE if their schoolmates found out-Social Life Horror. Our family has a very healthy shared attitude regarding nudity-AND privacy, respecting boundaries and the earned privileges of personally responsible behavior.Very recently, my 6 yo daughter said she preferred to wash her self and would call me if she needed help. The next day, she told me she loves sharing outdoor showers by the beach and sometimes playing w/me while in the tub BUT that mostly she wanted her alone time. Maybe talk to your boys(separately) about their feelings.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.17.09, 06:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I really think there is a difference between modesty and prudishness. And I think it is correct to teach modesty because that is a nice thing to have and a sign of respect. I pray my kids will have a joyful sex life and feel comfortable with themselves and their bodies, this is SO critical, to feel good in your physical skin. But I wouldn't even go into the bathroom with my kids when they were babies. The bodies are so different, why do they need to see that at such a young age? As a grown woman I have modesty in my body around them. They are 6 and 8, boy (8) and girl, and shower and go to the bathroom in front of each other, which doesn't thrill me but I don't make a big issue of it as they are obviously oblivious or think it's funny...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 05:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • You really didn't go into the bathroom with your kids when they were babies, wow.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 05:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • So who did go into the bathroom with them? Your special bathroom staff?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 08:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • what are you talking about? Of course I helped them, but as a grownup I didn't think they should see me going to the bathroom or naked, though I have been (whoa!) topless around them briefly while changing.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.10.09, 06:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • erm, I think OP is oblivious. These boys need their own space to bathe. Time to start respecting their needs for privacy, space, independence, etc...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 06:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • yuck

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 06:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Assuming you are not a fake, why do you do this?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 06:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • yes its inappropriate and f-ed up!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 08:51 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • They are way too old (esp. 8) for YOU to be showering with them.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 02:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • shower alone already! Geezz..... what are you trying to do, raise a seriel killer. enough already.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 05:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • there is nothing wrong with a little modesty. trust me, it can go a long way.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 05:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • YES!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.10.09, 11:52 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • nothing wrong with it if it's ok with you and your kids. some people will think this is bad, but they can't exactly state why that is, they just use words like "disgusting" and sick." it's an interesting cultural thing. obviously there is nothing sexual between you and your kids.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.13.09, 08:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I hope none of you who think it's sick and wrong ever plan to expand your horizons and travel to the den of sin known as Europe where naked beaches are completely normal. Even non-nude beaches have topless women and people changing their clothes out in the sunshine. Get over it, it's a body and we all have sex organs just like we all have belly buttons.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.17.09, 05:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • a reasonable rule of thumb i've heard is that if you're starting to sense/wonder about boundaries, that is your signal that it's time to have one. eg - i sleep naked and our son often gets in to bed w.us in the morning. one day i wanted to have a shirt on when he got in to the bed, so now i do. no big deal, just started to feel more comfortable to me. when he was around 4.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.19.09, 08:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Without informing us, our nsd is sending pictures our kids draw to the school psychologist who then "diagnoses" our children (and parents)through a drawing, without the benefit of either child or parental interview. The nsd feeds the psychologist family information, takes notes on her comments and they go into the child's record. This bothers me for many reasons. One, this is done without our consent. Two, drawing interpretation is hotly debated in the psychology field and I don't like our children being made guinea pigs. Three, what mother hasn't received a shocking drawing from dc which after questioning, is clearly innocent artistic attempt? Are all the nurseries doing this?

    37 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.18.09, 06:37 AM [ Flag ]
    • Any psychologist who does an evaluation of a child without the parent's consent should be sued for malpractice.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • is the school psychologist on staff?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Epiphany Community Nursery School does this on a regular basis.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • what they do is look for learning and social issues, not diagnose through drawing. they do inform the parents they are doing this.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 06:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Not at ecns. One mother found out b/c records were subpoenaed for a custody battle.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 06:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • parents are informed that the psychologist sees the children and makes evaluations. the child's "record" is meaningless. if the psychologist sees something of concern, the parents are informed. if she doesn't, parents hear nothing.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 07:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • How could "prostitute" (see below) appear on a 4yo record and not mean anything?!?! If the record is meaningless, why is it recorded? The psychologist wasn't concerned after mentioning "prostitute" ? This parent claims she was never informed. Was its sole purpose to harass this mother?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 07:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • i wouldn't send my child to a school that's looking for issues.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 07:07 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • bc if your child has issues you'd rather put your head in the sand and not know about them? then you have people complain that if there was a problem "you'd think the teachers would ahve noticed". schools try to be proactive, bc it's better to discover these things in preschool and attend to them, then to have them come out in elementary school and be trying to correct for them.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 07:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • what i meant was that good preschool teachers should be able to spot the red flags. sending pictures to psychologists is looking for trouble.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 07:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • does it occur to anyone that teachers express concerns and schools want to take the "heat" away from the teachers and put it on the school psych bc that way when parents have complaints or tirades, it's not the teacher who is blamed?

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.18.09, 07:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • The psych. from ecns predicted one 4yo would become a prostitute b/c she drew circles for boobs on her older sisters and a little loop at her crotch. Turned out it was sore from riding her new bike and her sisters do indeed have breasts.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 06:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Creepy!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 06:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • wow that's pretty bizarre. you can learn a lot looking at the pictures kids draw, but it's really open to interpretation and only valuable in conjunction with a thorough look at the child and family. any psych worth anything would know that you can't diagnose a kid based on a picture.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 07:05 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The nsd at ECNS targeted a mother in a custody battle. She sided with the father who has $$$ and has abused this woman in countless ways over two years. She showed me the notes and her dd drawing. Wendy Levy fed the psychologist lies that could only have come from the father, who was launching similar attacks against the mother with other professionals involved. This mother was not told anything by Wendy or the psychologist, she got the notes in subpoenaed documents and had to press Wendy to send the drawing. Wendy Levy nsd, Michele Asher Dunne psychologist and the father (nameless only to protect the child) are all culpable. Repulsive behavior by these three against a good mother fighting for joint custody against a multi-millionaire who...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 07:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • you keep posting this story on UB and clearly you are on the mom's side, but the fact is that this is ONE extraordinary situation and I imagine as with all things there are 2 sides to the story. if parents are going through such an ugly divorce, i am not suprised that the school psych is involved!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Actually, my first post. There must be other parents concerned about the attacks on this mother.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 07:44 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Levy was probably sleeping with the DH - or wished she was

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Had to be a wish. Who would touch that old bag?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 07:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • if i show my dh this thread, he will def. tell me all bets are off for sending dc to private nursery. ewww. we don't want out child exposed to materialistic, lying, woman abusing people.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 10:33 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • lol. Yes, those kind of people are ONLY at private nurseries in nyc. Numskull.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 10:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • From what I read, ecns nsd can act this way because she has no oversight via a board of directors. She apparently owns the school and runs it as a not for profit (I looked it up).Sounds like a loose canon to me. Avoid this school. Mine and many others are professionally run and offer great pre-K education.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.18.09, 04:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I have no horse in this race, but you should be more careful about what you are posting here. You could be sued for libel. More importantly, as awful as this whole situation sounds (if true), publishing/disseminating it further than it has already been does more harm than good for everyone involved.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 10:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • My point is to expose this nsd for unethical and illegal behavior. She should not be doing what she is doing - at any school. We have children at other schools, the head of one of them is familiar with the situation and disgusted by Wendy Levy's voluntary involvement in the legalities between these two and her behavior towards this mother.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 04:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Wendy Levy is one of the few in the private school system who will get involved in divorces and willingly participate. I think she likes it, maybe it makes her feel powerful? This is not her first time.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 05:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • lol. get your kid into Epiphany if you want a divorce. donate to Wendy so she will help you win. sick actually but my dc is there and i know this mother casually from pu do. she seems solid. the father i only met once at the class cocktail party. he got drunk. his girlfriend was confused with the mother by appearance. very odd. wendy does pick on the mother. i noticed her following the mother around first day of school. heard later wendy wrote her an email blasting her for talking to people she didn't want her to talk to.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 05:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Are you sure that this is actually happening? Have you approached both people about it? A professional psychologist will not do any type of "analysis" without speaking with the parents first. In a classroom setting they will observe all of the children in order to try and help the teachers and staff manage the classes better, though. If what you say is true, that would be really shocking (and illegal).

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.18.09, 08:03 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • it is not illegal to have a professional evaluate children if parents are notified, even if the notification is not as obvious as most people would like. she might be concerned that one child is not integrating properly into the class or that another child has a problem controlling emotions or whatever. parents sometimes don't see these things or don't recognize their significance. would you want to know?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 08:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • She said that she did not give her consent. That is illegal! That is why it is difficult for me to believe. If my own child's teachers were concerned, I would certainly want to follow up. But parents must give consent before an assessment.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 10:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • having a psychologist observe a classroom is fine, I would want to know if my dc had a problem. the above report is not ok because the mother was not notified of any problems. any mention of "prostitute" on a 4yo file would be a red flag and both parents, regardless of their legalities, should be contacted to help the child.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.18.09, 05:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Good point. NSD didn't try to help the family after gathering the illegal or otherwise information.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.18.09, 05:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • A friend told me about this post. I assure you the ECNS comments are only inaccurate in their lightness. The activities of the nsd are far worse than shared here.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.18.09, 07:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]

Your settings

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

UrbanBaby Asks...

Are you or your partner ever naked in front of your children?

Already voted? View Results

See previous polls »