advertisement
Click Here
On BNET: Dumb (but funny) career moves
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]Discouraged about post-baby body. Was in really good shape, and even now am no slacker. But abs are just so stretched out, they don't hold my belly in like they should. I still look pregnant. I am doing all the right things, exercise-wise. When will this change?

    14 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.06.09, 10:52 PM [ Flag ]
    • my trainer told me your abs never get back to where they were, especially if you've had C

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.07.09, 05:26 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The only thing that snapped them back for me, is pilates. Sit ups etc made them worse some how.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.07.09, 05:27 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OP here-glad to know Pilates worked for you, I am a certified instructor:)God is laughing at me. But seriously, how long did it take?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.07.09, 06:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • 3 months, 3 times a week, for 1/2 a hour. I only stuck to it though because I had a trainer. Too lazy to do it by myself. I also got into habit of mentally buttoning my belly button to my spine whenever I had to wait at a cross walk!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.07.09, 06:52 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Your abdominal muscles might have separated. Mine did. To check, lie on your back and do a little crunch. If your stomach sinks in (like a hole) then your muscles have separated. It is called Diastasis Recti. Mine is extremely bad but I had twins and got super stretched out. I am trying to figure out how to correct it. I think I need surgery.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.07.09, 06:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I had that, and did pilates with a sports medicine guy to correct it. Very specific exercises. My insurance paid for it, since I was diagnosed as having diastasis. It really worked, I was amazed, as my doctor was talking surgery to correct it.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.07.09, 06:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • How bad was yours? Was it one small spot or did it extend all the way from top to bottom of abdomen? I am so discouraged about mine right now. It is hard to imagine that pilates or any exercise could correct it (not that I do not believe you - I am just feeling overwhelmed).

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.07.09, 07:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • It was big, also had hernia at belly button. I was amazed at the results, but I was made to work very hard by instructor, and it is very specific, small exercises for this condition, so definitely only try this approach with someone who knows what they are doing in terms of diastasis. You would be surprised how many trainers know nothing about it.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.07.09, 07:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Okay. that is what I need to do. I have the belly button hernia too. I had that even from my first pg with singleton. What do I do? Go to my regular doctor for a diagnosis? Or OB? Not sure where to start. Gosh who will watch my kids while I go for treatments. I don't know if I can swing this. Maybe I need my mom to retire first. Can too much time pass before you begin?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.07.09, 07:29 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • My dc was 2 before I got properly diagnosed. Go to Doctor, see if they will refer you to sports medicine, or therapist that your insurance accepts...If not, then pay for a session with good person once a month, and have them write notes for you on exactly what to do at home. All we ever used was one of those big rubber balls.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.07.09, 07:33 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I thought that that was the case with my abs and then I did T-Tapp and my abs looked better than before (and I'd had a c-section).

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.07.09, 07:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]I am really REALLY mad about the fact that some of the Big Wall Street firms (ie: Goldman, Citi) and the NYSE comandeered H1N1 vaccinations before many, many OBs and Peds in NYC. Some of the firms got more vaccine than even the hospitals have received. I am 30 weeks pg with asthma and I have a 21 month old son. We are going to drive 1.5 hours today (one way) for the *glimmer* of a hope to get the vaccine (unfortunately it will not be thimerosol free but I really don't know what my options are at this point). I feel like not only has Wall Street messed up our world economy, now they are effectively saying "our lives are potentially more important than yours or that of your children." I would LOVE to see some moms from this board organiz...

    99 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.06.09, 05:48 AM [ Flag ]
    • I'm not going to organize, but I'm right there with you. GS used to be the "golden boy" - I'm so glad everyone is finally getting a chance to see their true colors.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 05:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I just watched the coverage about this on the Today show. The problem is that GS, Citi, etc. probably played by the rules and just applied for a share of the vaccine and NYS gave them a share. The problem is that Wall Street has such a bad reputation that the blame goes to them and not the State that actually allowed it. The right thing for Wall Street would have been to donate their share to a local hospital and ask their employees to stand in line with all the other people that don't work for them.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 05:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Thank you for intelligent feedback on this issue-- before we demonize Wall Street let us not forget that sometimes you just have to play by the rules to get what you want.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 10:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • one word: disgusting

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I really don't understand people's outrage. These companies applied for the vaccines like any other entity, paid for it, and got it. If you want medicine to be completely govt. run then get behind your president and change the health care policy. But as it stands these firms have not done anything wrong, and are simply protecting their workers which I commend them for.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • How do you explain that Lenox Hill Hospital got the exact same number of vaccines as Goldman Sachs did? I agree this is a problem with how the state is distributing the vaccines and it's always been like this that companies with medical offices can apply for a share. Nobody did anything legally wrong but there are ethical implications. Let's not talk about image.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:08 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Lenox Hill Hospital is poorly run. They did not order enough early enough.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • the city had given 800,000 doses to about 1,100 providers, with Lenox Hill Hospital, for example, getting 1,200 doses and banking firm Goldman Sachs getting 200 of the 5,300 doses it asked for.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Ordinary people work for these firms. You do understand that, right? PG women, people with small children, and people with health problems just like you. Are you saying you think their lives are less important because of who they work for?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:07 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITA!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:08 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • No, the problem is that the chance for you to get an H1N1 vaccine is much higher when you work on Wall Street. Why don't you just let Wall Street folks line up at clinics and doctor offices like everybody else?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • But why? Companies provide flu shots for their employees every year on-site. Why should this be any different? Why should they make their employees line up? This is not their problem.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:19 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • sigh, and again - the problem with society today - "not my problem"

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • It is not their problem. It is the city/state distribution sites' problem. They decide who is priority and who is not. Don't blame the companies. Blame the distributor.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • No, I think people are saying that the high risk groups are not over represented at GS - (ie no children, pregnant women make up a very small percentage of their work force) and the vax were not ONLY given to pregnant women or asthma suffers. The right, moral thing to do - when GS/Citi saw the shortage would have been to donate theirs to peds/hospital in order to vax the AT RISK groups and allow their non at risk employees to wait. But right and moral have a hard time finding a place in Wall Street Firms.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • morgan stanley got 1000 shots -they are donating them back. I'm pretty sure goldman got more than 200 shots if MS got 1000

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • The people at GS are assholes and they simply cannot comprehend why they have an image problem. Actually, I think they don't care.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • They are being a good company for their employees. If only every company took these steps to look out for their people.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • lol. I don't think they're assholes (my bil works there,) but I do think their egos have been so over-inflated for so long that you are correct in that they're completely clueless as to what their image problem is. They just don't get it. They could use to hire a good PR firm.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • "the city had given 800,000 doses to about 1,100 providers, with Lenox Hill Hospital, for example, getting 1,200 doses and banking firm Goldman Sachs getting 200 of the 5,300 doses it asked for."

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • just bc you have a small child does not put you at risk - you are not to get the shot!!!! You are not high risk

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • From the NY times article, these firms are making vx available only to employees in high risk groups.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • For every high risk person at Wall Street (or any other big corporation) how many are there not working for them? Considering that doctor offices have not received any of the vaccines.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I gotta bridge... and having small children at home is NOT a high risk group.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • If you don't like the rules, complain to the government. These firms played by the rules and got the vaccines, you can't blame them for that.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I think this is a big part of what is wrong with society today. Yes, you can blame them. There is and always has been the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. We should not excuse questionable behavoir, by saying well... they did follow the rules. We need individual and collective moral people. As moms, are we trying our best to teach childrent to get whatever they can as long as they find a loophole - or are we teaching them to be kind, thoughtful, considerate and sometimes sacriface for someone else?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • what do you propose they should have done?? not order the vaccines?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • So if your pediatrician got his supply and can give it to you, but the local hospital needs it, you would donate it? Come on.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • My ped can't give it to me. I am not high risk. My ped should use all their doses on high risk children.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I'm asking hypothetically.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:27 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • you are not answering the questions. she did not ask whether your ped is giving it to you. it's a hypothetical to show you the error in your logic.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • What is wrong with you? I did answer the question. My ped will not treat adults. She cannot give it to me. Did she give it to my child yet? NO. My child is not on the high risk group. And it is question, not questionS. Geeze lady.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 06:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • NP: There's always going to be someone higher risk was the OR's point, I think. If your ped had a supply, there would certainly be someone higher risk/more deserving that she could give it to. So where does the obligation to sacrifice begin and end?

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.06.09, 06:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • No, you didn't answer the question at all. - NP.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.06.09, 06:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OK. Meanwhile my kids - ages 10 to 14 - haven't been able to get them yet. The high risk group is ages 2 to 19. I find it hard to believe that there at any children working at these large firms. Please.... it's bullsh!t and everyone knows it.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • actually, 2-19 is not the first priority. first priority is pregnant women and children under 2-

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Makes even more sense to give all those dosages to the wall street schmucks!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Goldman has 22,425 employees. I am sure they have 200 people who are high risk within that group.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • then only those in the high risk group should be given the vaccine. are they saying that this is what they're going to do? NO, they're not.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 06:56 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I actually think there is going to be a big backlash. I almost think these guys are going to need armed guards because some crazy is going to take a gun and shoot them. It just keeps getting worse. The favoritism, the bonuses, now the flu vaccine. Let the bail me out. Obama is in Goldman's pocket and they do think they are better than the great unwashed.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • nonsense

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • all it takes is one crazy -look what happened in texas. People are getting angrier by the minute. It will happen

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • it sounds like you might be that unstable crazy person!!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • you are the nutter that things like this don't happen. I called you no names - but you had to come back rude. Go suck on an egg

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 07:07 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • what name were you called? and, really... "go suck on an egg"?? are you 12? Does your mommy know you are using the computer right now??

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 07:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Morgan Stanley disingenuously "donated" their ONE THOUSAND vaccines to area hospitals. There is a vulgar irony to this. And for those defending these cos., how many pregnant women, young children, etc. really high risk people? My dr had the shot and my ped still doesn't so my 1 yr old is still waiting while mr/ms muckity muck doesn't? hmmm.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I work for Citi and there were 4 PG women on our team this year (out of about 20). Two mid-level professionals, two admins (i.e. not the muckity muck of the firm).

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • this is absurd. how does one disingenuously donate anything? Back when these were ordered nobody knew there was going to be a big delay in the production of the vaccine. The company thought it was getting its fair allotment and then when it was clear there was a shortage they donated them back. You're showing your colors as a bitter hater, which just voids your "opinion" since it's irrational.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The problem is that there's a shortage - full stop. The school district next door to us has the vaccine, ours doesn't. Yet I'm not trying to assemble an angry mob against them.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • But its a school, not an IB largely populated by healthy middle age men and women not "high risk" categories. So you can remove your halo now.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:26 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • exactly...

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I think Goldman has enough high risks to distribute the 200 shots without moral implications.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • yes, I'm sure they do. Diabetics, pregnant women, people with other chronic health problems, surely there are at least 200 at a large frim like goldman-

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:32 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • OR: The POINT was that .here is not enough vaccine

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • ^^^available for everyone that is high-risk. That's the heart of the issue, and it's not Wall Street's fault. Someone with your profile that happened to work for Goldman Sachs would be just as "worthy" of a vaccine as you are.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • np: then why are people at GS who are not in the high risk group being given the vaccine. that's completely irresponsible.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Yes, that would be irresponsible if true (which I'm not sure it is - I read that only high-risk employees were being vaccinated). But that's not the OP's issue - she's pissed they even got the vaccine in the first place, regardless of how they're using it. Like if the principal of my neighboring school took all her vaccines home and passed them out to friends and family, that would be irresponsible also.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 06:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • while I do believe most of teh shots went to high risk, I guarantee a few went to the top execs-

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.06.09, 08:00 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • If you are at GS, you need to be in a high-risk group. A friend of mine is pg and she had to stand in line with others and be screened by a nurse before being alowed to get the shot. When they hand out the regular seasonal flu-shot it takes about 30 seconds to go in, read the pamphlet and get the shot.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 11:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • As another mother waiting for the vaccine for her 3 young children, I understand the frustration but let's direct it where to the agency that is mishandling this situation. The NY State Health Department and the NY City Health Department are responsible for distributing the vaccine to facilities and agencies that have applied for them. It is NYCHD's responsibility to say who is a priority group and they have been (re)instructed by the CDC to insure that health care workers, pregnant women, kids etc are vaccinated first. I can't stand GS or Citi either but it's not their fault that they've been given the vaccine in lieu of higher priority groups. Picketing Wall St is pointless... if you have a beef, take it to State Health Commissioner R...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Finally, a voice of reason.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Those companies could have donated their share back to the general public because of the shortage. Yes, the authorities should have done it differently as well.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Hear hear

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I agree with you, but maybe I'll start a new post: Why doesn't GS get their sh*t together and work on their public image? For a "successful" firm, they seem clueless.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:43 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Which is an entirely different question than: How dare GS go thorough proper channels to obtain 200 flu shots for their high risk employees?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • yes, but they should have been smarter to manage this information better. It's common sense. A PR person would do them a world of good. I can think of a thousand ways that they could have put this info out there in a better manner. They don't seem to realize they have a PR problem.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 07:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • they're going to crash and burn soon. they're numbers just don't add up in this economy. they're making money hand over fist. something doesn't smell right. sorry.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I honestly hope they do. So tired of the arrogance.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 07:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Only if you really want to see another 20,000+ unemployed finance professionals, which will really send this city into a recession. Your callousness toward so many ordinary people whose wellbeing depends on that firm is astounding.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 07:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • This is true, I'm also angry that Goldman and the other companies were able to get away with this but the real problem is that somebody in authority should have been able to stop this and didn't.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 07:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • OP here: I am getting ready to leave for the long car ride now. I am glad for the debate that this has generated. I would be happy to know that the vaccines that went to GS, NYSE, etc. truly went to those at high-risk (of course, their employees have the opportunity to get to doctors like we do, so why didn't their doctors get the doses)? Anyway, if high-risk ppl got it, great. But what I got from the interview with the head of the health dept in NY was him throwing up his hands and saying, basically, "It's up to the companies to decide who's high risk." Let me guess... the guy at the top who has high BP? C'mon... Anyway, regardless of how you stand on this issue, please wish me luck that we can get the shot -- we are basically trav...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 07:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • As long as there is a shortage, anyone that gets a supply will have to police themselves, no? Even doctors will have patients that are or are not high risk (or those that are more high risk than others).

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 08:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Please, if you are THAT worried, quarantine yourself and your db until flu season is over. There isn't enough vaccine to go around, period, so even if GS and MS didn't get any that still doesn't mean it would make your plight ANY different. And for God's sake, stop watching the news and reading this board. Your getting yourself way too worked up over this.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 07:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • You can't listen to the sensationalist media's bent on this and trust it. They are trying to get people stirred up, and it is working. GS got 200 vaccines and are distributing them to their own high-risk employees, such as people with asthma and elderly people. Every GS exec is not getting the vaccine. And the GS workers who are getting the vaccine through work are as deserving of it as any other non GS-employed at-risk person.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 08:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • There are injectible vaccines available through New York City. I got one at a clinic in Harlem. You can find the names and numbers of the clinics if you go to the NY Dept of Health website. So, no need to travel to Pennsylvania if you're in NYC

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 09:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'm 30 weeks pregnant and have been searching for the H1N1 shot. My ob @ Columbia Pres can't get it. I've been calling everywhere. After hearing about Goldman I decided to call them to see if I could 'buy' a shot. At first they said - no, sorry, none left. I then told them I was an investor and the guy told me to hold on as he was transferring me to their nurse. The nurse said they used all their shots the same day they received them. I'm still frustrated but I find it more annoying that I was given the brush off until I claimed to be an investor.. then they were happy to try to help.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 10:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • i am 100% with you, it's outrageous that they got it before medical personnel, and doctor's offices. i'm pregnant and have an asthmatic 3 year old and i'm having trouble.....

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 05:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I am just as mad about it as you are. I know what you say is true because I heard it directly from several Goldman employees recently. Any suggestions as to what to do - letter writing campaign?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 05:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Oh please your anger is misdirected.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 08:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Would you hire a nanny that you really liked, but didn't have infant experience? DC is 14 mo and #2 is due in 3 months. I would be home for 6 weeks to provide instruction. Nanny has only cared for kids aged 3 and up. TIA.

    17 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.06.09, 12:39 PM [ Flag ]
    • How much "infant experience" did you have before the birth of your first child?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 12:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • No infant experience at all or none as a nanny. I know nannies who had younger siblings or large extended families, so they've cared for infants but not on a daily basis. It depends on your level of comfort. If you feel experienced enough to teach her, then go for it.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 12:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • None at all. No kids of her own, but she's eager to learn. I feel like I could teach newborn care, but DH thinks it's a bad idea. Mentioned the point that we had no newborn exp prior to DD and his response was "yeah, but you're the mom".

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 12:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I probably would. I think the infant stuff can be picked up quickly, and she should be great with your dc who may need some extra fun and attention. Having someone good with toddlers is invaluable IMO.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 12:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Thank you. That's a great point and my gut is to hire her. She's sweet and energetic. DD would definitely enjoy her company. I'll be home to supervise newborn care and hopefully she'll pick it right up.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 12:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I don't know, it's not the newborn care I'd be worried about, because there's not much to diaper changing and holding. But taking care of a 3 yo is different than taking care of a 9 month or 14 month old.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 01:00 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • As long she knows how to change a diaper and you feel like her instincts are good I think it's fine.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 01:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • We did this. Former teacher, great refs, 3 kids and 1 grandkid of her own! It was terrible. She had no understanding of how to connect w/ an infant (3 months old). Our dd screamed and screamed with her. One day I took the day off to stay home and observe. When dd cried, she didn't really pick her up, or interact with her. She held a toy over her head instead. Fired her after 3 weeks. Problem is the lack of real professional references evaluating skills w/ infants. Might be ok if you have lots of time to observe yourself during a trial period. We were THRILLED with our next nanny, btw.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 01:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I would say no. There are a lot of things that new mothers are paranoid about that a caretaker might not be so careful about - holding up their head, making sure the bottle's not too hot, changing the diaper enough to avoid diaper rash, etc., etc. You want to have peace of mind with your nanny, and you might not with someone who is inexperienced.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 01:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Yes. IMO her core character and work ethic are much more important than experience. My first long term nanny had no childcare experience, but she had amazing work references. She was awesome. Kind, loving, responsible, hard working, never late, etc. You can teach the skills if you have a good person and a motivated learner. That said, when we had our 3rd we ended up going with a nanny who was herself a mom of 3. Caring for 3dc is rare in NYC and wanted someone who could really handle it.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 01:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Can you give it a trial run?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 02:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • no because caring for a 14 mo and newborn is an enormous amount of work and responsibility and she doesn't have the background.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 03:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • You sound weird - you're leaving an 18 m/o and an infant after six weeks? How many hours will you be away each day?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 04:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Be nice, a lot of people do this...it's pretty normal. Not all people can afford to take more than 6 weeks off.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 04:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Then why would OP have a second baby and make it even harder for each baby to get attention and care?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 08:02 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]2.5 month old db lasts about 5-10 minutes with dh when he gets home from work before she starts to cry for me. when will it get better so i can have a break? anyone btdt?

    7 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.06.09, 03:12 PM [ Flag ]
    • do you let her cry for a little bit? if you go to her immediately, she is bound to keep it up. she may need a little gentle encouragement to get to know her dad is a good caregiver too! try to leave her with him a little bit longer every day.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 03:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • i leave her with him and give suggestions on what works for me. he will try (only for a few moments) and then come and stand by me until i take her. i try to make it longer, but then it is punishing for both of them.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 03:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • ^^ also, better when earlier in the day, like on weekends or in the morning before work when she will happily spend 30 mins with him, but she is cranky by the evening even when she is well-napped.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 03:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • oh, that's REALLY hard if he is not willing to work with you! it sounds like he needs to make a bigger effort to learn to be with her. it's hard--some parents have a lot of trouble relating to babies. it may be a lot easier for your dh to care for her when she gets a little older. in the meantime, he should try some different techniques, though--you need a break!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 03:51 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • op: i know. :( by the time i get her back she is really upset. i try to explain that i am also learning as i go and it is trial and error, but ...

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 03:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • keep working on him and maybe talk up all the fun things about hanging out with her. good luck! i assigned my husband "shifts" (usually during the night) so that i could get a break. it can really be exhausting, and you hate to see your baby upset!

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 03:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • he was the first to make her smile and is really proud of that but as soon as she starts to fuss, he panics. i'm giving him various jobs, like he gives her a night time bottle that i express the night before ... i'll keep trying. thanks!

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.06.09, 04:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
refresh »

Your settings

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

UrbanBaby Asks...

Are you or your partner ever naked in front of your children?

Already voted? View Results

See previous polls »