advertisement
Click Here
On mySimon: Forty Years on Abbey Road
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]Would appreciate recommendations for a good doctor who performs CVS in Manhattan. Thanks!

    16 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.09.09, 08:13 AM [ Flag ]
    • Joanne Stone. Everyone goes to her.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 08:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • mark evans or stone are the two gurus

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 10:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ita. mark evans was great.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 10:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • as arrogant and pompous as he is, hes great at what he does.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 10:46 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • i didn't have the arrogant and pompous experience, but i had a very routine CVS w no issues.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.09.09, 10:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • oh, i went for consult w him and sat in his office for an hour while he showed me pictures of his many meetings with celebs and dignitaries--the pope, various presidents, kings, queens, etc. he spent quite a bit of time telling me about how hes the worlds biggest expert, etc. i had a very complicated situation though, and i dont know that any other dr wouldve been able to help besides him.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.09.09, 10:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • that would explain it. I'm sorry you had to deal w that, but glad that there was a doctor who could help.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.09.09, 11:03 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I didn't find him to be arrogant or pompous either but found him a little bit heavy-handed in his "guidance" regarding selective eliminations. I was pregnant with twins at the time and her spent a lot of time explaining to me that twin pregnancies were inherently more dangerous and that selectively eliminating one was a perfectly valid option. I was quite clear that I was willing to "risk" having twins (altho, in the case of high multiples, I understand his point) and he eventually let it drop. So other than a pretty strong POV, I found him to be excellent, professional and had two routine CVS screens without incident.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.09.09, 11:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • yes, he is quite the advocate of reductions. again, i think he's excellent, and highly skilled, and would use him again without question. (and btw, i did have a very complicated reduction done)

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.09.09, 11:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I really liked him too. I still can't figure out why he had his picture with the Pope up in his office. Don't they disagree on some very key issues?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 11:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Dr. Wapner - he practically invented the procedure He works out of columbia in the east 60s. I think he's the best. He did mine and does many twin pregnancies as well. People fly in for him from all over the country and the world

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 11:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITA- I was in a high risk practice at Columbia-Presbyterian. He has an office there on 60th & Madison. He actually pioneered the process--so the risk with him is minimal. He is also a very nice guy to boot.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 11:38 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Went to Joanne Stone 2x. Had no problems on either occasion. Very pleasant.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 11:46 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]At what week is it ok to tell people about pregnancy?

    18 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.09.09, 06:49 AM [ Flag ]
    • I wait until 20 weeks.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 06:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ^^I wait until after my amnio results, but I did tell people once around 12 weeks, and it made the pregnancy seem so much longer. But if it's your 1st, that probably wouldn't bother you.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 06:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • ANYTIME! Come on. Seriously? If you're old enough to be pregnant, you're old enough to know yourself in this regard. If you feel you'd need the support anyway, should the pg miscarry prior to 10 or 12 weeks, then by all means, celebrate vocally. If on the other hand, you're more private and deal with pain on your own, then wait until you at the very least have a confirmed heartbeat and a fetus the size the doc expects it to be. Safer of course to wait until 12 weeks.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 06:55 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • She's just asking, relax.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 07:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I hate it when people tell me to relax. It is obnoxious. How do you know I wasn't just irritated by the question - which was all it was by the way. My blood pressure didn't even blip, so off with you.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.09.09, 07:33 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Generally, after the first trimester (around week 13), but it's not a hard and fast rule - whenever you feel comfortable, and depending on whom you're telling.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 07:00 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I waited until I was showing. Which was almost 5 months with first, barely 14 weeks with second. I agree with telling people later, people kept commenting as to how I'd been pregnant "forever" the second time around!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 07:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I waited until the first trimester was over, I think that is standard. If you have issues, you may want to wait longer but it also depends on whether you can get away with it or not.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 07:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • once a heartbeat is detected miscarriage risk is not statistically greater than 12 weeks, when most people tell.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 07:43 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I started telling people around 13-14 weeks. I was so paunchy at that point that most people had already figured it out, though. I started showing by 11-12 weeks.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 07:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Whenever you want to. No rules on this one.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 09:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I told people at 12 weeks with #1 and about 20-30 weeks with #2. I enjoyed waiting longer and don't have any annoying, "are you still pregnant" comments and at work I was treated like a lame duck.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 10:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • On this board you essentially asked, "How long before you started showing?" and the competivie moms are arguing over who managed to go the longest. You can tell people whenever you want to. Some wish to wait because they worry about mc or telling their employer, others just want to scream it to the world as soon as they see a heartbeat or even as soon as they get a +hpt.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 10:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • why is it good to go the longest without showing? I am chubby around the middle and not a small person, I think this is why I took so long to show. SOme of my petite friends showed so early, because they ahd no fat to camoflauge!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 11:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • everyone is different. some people wait until they hear a heartbeat, because miscarriage odds decrease a lot at that point. others wait until the amnio. i waited a really long time, more than 20 weeks.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.09.09, 10:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]I am really REALLY mad about the fact that some of the Big Wall Street firms (ie: Goldman, Citi) and the NYSE comandeered H1N1 vaccinations before many, many OBs and Peds in NYC. Some of the firms got more vaccine than even the hospitals have received. I am 30 weeks pg with asthma and I have a 21 month old son. We are going to drive 1.5 hours today (one way) for the *glimmer* of a hope to get the vaccine (unfortunately it will not be thimerosol free but I really don't know what my options are at this point). I feel like not only has Wall Street messed up our world economy, now they are effectively saying "our lives are potentially more important than yours or that of your children." I would LOVE to see some moms from this board organiz...

    101 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.06.09, 05:48 AM [ Flag ]
    • I'm not going to organize, but I'm right there with you. GS used to be the "golden boy" - I'm so glad everyone is finally getting a chance to see their true colors.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 05:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I just watched the coverage about this on the Today show. The problem is that GS, Citi, etc. probably played by the rules and just applied for a share of the vaccine and NYS gave them a share. The problem is that Wall Street has such a bad reputation that the blame goes to them and not the State that actually allowed it. The right thing for Wall Street would have been to donate their share to a local hospital and ask their employees to stand in line with all the other people that don't work for them.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 05:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Thank you for intelligent feedback on this issue-- before we demonize Wall Street let us not forget that sometimes you just have to play by the rules to get what you want.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 10:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • one word: disgusting

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I really don't understand people's outrage. These companies applied for the vaccines like any other entity, paid for it, and got it. If you want medicine to be completely govt. run then get behind your president and change the health care policy. But as it stands these firms have not done anything wrong, and are simply protecting their workers which I commend them for.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • How do you explain that Lenox Hill Hospital got the exact same number of vaccines as Goldman Sachs did? I agree this is a problem with how the state is distributing the vaccines and it's always been like this that companies with medical offices can apply for a share. Nobody did anything legally wrong but there are ethical implications. Let's not talk about image.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:08 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Lenox Hill Hospital is poorly run. They did not order enough early enough.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • the city had given 800,000 doses to about 1,100 providers, with Lenox Hill Hospital, for example, getting 1,200 doses and banking firm Goldman Sachs getting 200 of the 5,300 doses it asked for.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Ordinary people work for these firms. You do understand that, right? PG women, people with small children, and people with health problems just like you. Are you saying you think their lives are less important because of who they work for?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:07 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITA!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:08 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • No, the problem is that the chance for you to get an H1N1 vaccine is much higher when you work on Wall Street. Why don't you just let Wall Street folks line up at clinics and doctor offices like everybody else?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:09 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • But why? Companies provide flu shots for their employees every year on-site. Why should this be any different? Why should they make their employees line up? This is not their problem.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:19 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • sigh, and again - the problem with society today - "not my problem"

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • It is not their problem. It is the city/state distribution sites' problem. They decide who is priority and who is not. Don't blame the companies. Blame the distributor.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • No, I think people are saying that the high risk groups are not over represented at GS - (ie no children, pregnant women make up a very small percentage of their work force) and the vax were not ONLY given to pregnant women or asthma suffers. The right, moral thing to do - when GS/Citi saw the shortage would have been to donate theirs to peds/hospital in order to vax the AT RISK groups and allow their non at risk employees to wait. But right and moral have a hard time finding a place in Wall Street Firms.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • morgan stanley got 1000 shots -they are donating them back. I'm pretty sure goldman got more than 200 shots if MS got 1000

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • The people at GS are assholes and they simply cannot comprehend why they have an image problem. Actually, I think they don't care.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • They are being a good company for their employees. If only every company took these steps to look out for their people.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • lol. I don't think they're assholes (my bil works there,) but I do think their egos have been so over-inflated for so long that you are correct in that they're completely clueless as to what their image problem is. They just don't get it. They could use to hire a good PR firm.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:39 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • "the city had given 800,000 doses to about 1,100 providers, with Lenox Hill Hospital, for example, getting 1,200 doses and banking firm Goldman Sachs getting 200 of the 5,300 doses it asked for."

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • just bc you have a small child does not put you at risk - you are not to get the shot!!!! You are not high risk

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • From the NY times article, these firms are making vx available only to employees in high risk groups.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • For every high risk person at Wall Street (or any other big corporation) how many are there not working for them? Considering that doctor offices have not received any of the vaccines.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I gotta bridge... and having small children at home is NOT a high risk group.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • If you don't like the rules, complain to the government. These firms played by the rules and got the vaccines, you can't blame them for that.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I think this is a big part of what is wrong with society today. Yes, you can blame them. There is and always has been the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. We should not excuse questionable behavoir, by saying well... they did follow the rules. We need individual and collective moral people. As moms, are we trying our best to teach childrent to get whatever they can as long as they find a loophole - or are we teaching them to be kind, thoughtful, considerate and sometimes sacriface for someone else?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • what do you propose they should have done?? not order the vaccines?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • So if your pediatrician got his supply and can give it to you, but the local hospital needs it, you would donate it? Come on.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • My ped can't give it to me. I am not high risk. My ped should use all their doses on high risk children.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I'm asking hypothetically.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:27 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • you are not answering the questions. she did not ask whether your ped is giving it to you. it's a hypothetical to show you the error in your logic.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • What is wrong with you? I did answer the question. My ped will not treat adults. She cannot give it to me. Did she give it to my child yet? NO. My child is not on the high risk group. And it is question, not questionS. Geeze lady.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 06:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • NP: There's always going to be someone higher risk was the OR's point, I think. If your ped had a supply, there would certainly be someone higher risk/more deserving that she could give it to. So where does the obligation to sacrifice begin and end?

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.06.09, 06:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • No, you didn't answer the question at all. - NP.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.06.09, 06:48 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OK. Meanwhile my kids - ages 10 to 14 - haven't been able to get them yet. The high risk group is ages 2 to 19. I find it hard to believe that there at any children working at these large firms. Please.... it's bullsh!t and everyone knows it.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • actually, 2-19 is not the first priority. first priority is pregnant women and children under 2-

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Makes even more sense to give all those dosages to the wall street schmucks!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:34 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Goldman has 22,425 employees. I am sure they have 200 people who are high risk within that group.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • then only those in the high risk group should be given the vaccine. are they saying that this is what they're going to do? NO, they're not.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 06:56 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I actually think there is going to be a big backlash. I almost think these guys are going to need armed guards because some crazy is going to take a gun and shoot them. It just keeps getting worse. The favoritism, the bonuses, now the flu vaccine. Let the bail me out. Obama is in Goldman's pocket and they do think they are better than the great unwashed.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • nonsense

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • all it takes is one crazy -look what happened in texas. People are getting angrier by the minute. It will happen

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:15 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • it sounds like you might be that unstable crazy person!!

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • you are the nutter that things like this don't happen. I called you no names - but you had to come back rude. Go suck on an egg

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 07:07 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • what name were you called? and, really... "go suck on an egg"?? are you 12? Does your mommy know you are using the computer right now??

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 07:13 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Morgan Stanley disingenuously "donated" their ONE THOUSAND vaccines to area hospitals. There is a vulgar irony to this. And for those defending these cos., how many pregnant women, young children, etc. really high risk people? My dr had the shot and my ped still doesn't so my 1 yr old is still waiting while mr/ms muckity muck doesn't? hmmm.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:24 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I work for Citi and there were 4 PG women on our team this year (out of about 20). Two mid-level professionals, two admins (i.e. not the muckity muck of the firm).

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • this is absurd. how does one disingenuously donate anything? Back when these were ordered nobody knew there was going to be a big delay in the production of the vaccine. The company thought it was getting its fair allotment and then when it was clear there was a shortage they donated them back. You're showing your colors as a bitter hater, which just voids your "opinion" since it's irrational.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • The problem is that there's a shortage - full stop. The school district next door to us has the vaccine, ours doesn't. Yet I'm not trying to assemble an angry mob against them.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • But its a school, not an IB largely populated by healthy middle age men and women not "high risk" categories. So you can remove your halo now.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:26 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • exactly...

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I think Goldman has enough high risks to distribute the 200 shots without moral implications.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • yes, I'm sure they do. Diabetics, pregnant women, people with other chronic health problems, surely there are at least 200 at a large frim like goldman-

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:32 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • OR: The POINT was that .here is not enough vaccine

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:40 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • ^^^available for everyone that is high-risk. That's the heart of the issue, and it's not Wall Street's fault. Someone with your profile that happened to work for Goldman Sachs would be just as "worthy" of a vaccine as you are.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 06:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • np: then why are people at GS who are not in the high risk group being given the vaccine. that's completely irresponsible.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 06:50 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Yes, that would be irresponsible if true (which I'm not sure it is - I read that only high-risk employees were being vaccinated). But that's not the OP's issue - she's pissed they even got the vaccine in the first place, regardless of how they're using it. Like if the principal of my neighboring school took all her vaccines home and passed them out to friends and family, that would be irresponsible also.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 06:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • while I do believe most of teh shots went to high risk, I guarantee a few went to the top execs-

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.06.09, 08:00 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • If you are at GS, you need to be in a high-risk group. A friend of mine is pg and she had to stand in line with others and be screened by a nurse before being alowed to get the shot. When they hand out the regular seasonal flu-shot it takes about 30 seconds to go in, read the pamphlet and get the shot.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.06.09, 11:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • As another mother waiting for the vaccine for her 3 young children, I understand the frustration but let's direct it where to the agency that is mishandling this situation. The NY State Health Department and the NY City Health Department are responsible for distributing the vaccine to facilities and agencies that have applied for them. It is NYCHD's responsibility to say who is a priority group and they have been (re)instructed by the CDC to insure that health care workers, pregnant women, kids etc are vaccinated first. I can't stand GS or Citi either but it's not their fault that they've been given the vaccine in lieu of higher priority groups. Picketing Wall St is pointless... if you have a beef, take it to State Health Commissioner R...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 06:28 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Finally, a voice of reason.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Those companies could have donated their share back to the general public because of the shortage. Yes, the authorities should have done it differently as well.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:36 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Hear hear

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:37 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I agree with you, but maybe I'll start a new post: Why doesn't GS get their sh*t together and work on their public image? For a "successful" firm, they seem clueless.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 06:43 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Which is an entirely different question than: How dare GS go thorough proper channels to obtain 200 flu shots for their high risk employees?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • yes, but they should have been smarter to manage this information better. It's common sense. A PR person would do them a world of good. I can think of a thousand ways that they could have put this info out there in a better manner. They don't seem to realize they have a PR problem.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 07:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • they're going to crash and burn soon. they're numbers just don't add up in this economy. they're making money hand over fist. something doesn't smell right. sorry.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.06.09, 06:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I honestly hope they do. So tired of the arrogance.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.06.09, 07:04 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Only if you really want to see another 20,000+ unemployed finance professionals, which will really send this city into a recession. Your callousness toward so many ordinary people whose wellbeing depends on that firm is astounding.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.06.09, 07:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • This is true, I'm also angry that Goldman and the other companies were able to get away with this but the real problem is that somebody in authority should have been able to stop this and didn't.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 07:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • OP here: I am getting ready to leave for the long car ride now. I am glad for the debate that this has generated. I would be happy to know that the vaccines that went to GS, NYSE, etc. truly went to those at high-risk (of course, their employees have the opportunity to get to doctors like we do, so why didn't their doctors get the doses)? Anyway, if high-risk ppl got it, great. But what I got from the interview with the head of the health dept in NY was him throwing up his hands and saying, basically, "It's up to the companies to decide who's high risk." Let me guess... the guy at the top who has high BP? C'mon... Anyway, regardless of how you stand on this issue, please wish me luck that we can get the shot -- we are basically trav...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 07:47 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • As long as there is a shortage, anyone that gets a supply will have to police themselves, no? Even doctors will have patients that are or are not high risk (or those that are more high risk than others).

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.06.09, 08:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Please, if you are THAT worried, quarantine yourself and your db until flu season is over. There isn't enough vaccine to go around, period, so even if GS and MS didn't get any that still doesn't mean it would make your plight ANY different. And for God's sake, stop watching the news and reading this board. Your getting yourself way too worked up over this.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 07:51 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • You can't listen to the sensationalist media's bent on this and trust it. They are trying to get people stirred up, and it is working. GS got 200 vaccines and are distributing them to their own high-risk employees, such as people with asthma and elderly people. Every GS exec is not getting the vaccine. And the GS workers who are getting the vaccine through work are as deserving of it as any other non GS-employed at-risk person.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 08:23 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • There are injectible vaccines available through New York City. I got one at a clinic in Harlem. You can find the names and numbers of the clinics if you go to the NY Dept of Health website. So, no need to travel to Pennsylvania if you're in NYC

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 09:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'm 30 weeks pregnant and have been searching for the H1N1 shot. My ob @ Columbia Pres can't get it. I've been calling everywhere. After hearing about Goldman I decided to call them to see if I could 'buy' a shot. At first they said - no, sorry, none left. I then told them I was an investor and the guy told me to hold on as he was transferring me to their nurse. The nurse said they used all their shots the same day they received them. I'm still frustrated but I find it more annoying that I was given the brush off until I claimed to be an investor.. then they were happy to try to help.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 10:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • i am 100% with you, it's outrageous that they got it before medical personnel, and doctor's offices. i'm pregnant and have an asthmatic 3 year old and i'm having trouble.....

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 05:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I am just as mad about it as you are. I know what you say is true because I heard it directly from several Goldman employees recently. Any suggestions as to what to do - letter writing campaign?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 05:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Oh please your anger is misdirected.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 08:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Hey I am a journalism student at Stony Brook University in Long Island and I am trying to do a broadcast piece as my final project about the shortage of the H1N1 vaccine and people who are in the high risk group who have been turned away because of it. You would be a perfect person for me to interview. Would you mind contacting me. My name is Christine and it would be extremely helpful. My email is christine.l.vargas@gmail.com or you can call me which might be better anyway at 914-843-6708. I think it is crazy that it is a known fact that young children and pregnant women are at high risk of getting the swine flu and the government recommends them to get it, but yet it is very hard to obtain. Please give me a call. I think this is a major p...

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.09.09, 09:35 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]pregnant and can't stop eating chocolate. help!

    19 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    11.05.09, 02:32 PM [ Flag ]
    • Get rid of the stash and everytime you want a piece just imagine the same amount of fat as the size of the chocolate being added to your hips.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.05.09, 02:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • there is candy everywhere at work- someone sent us a 5 lb box of see's choclate. I've had like 10 pieces already, plus some halloween candy this morning. I have been SUCH a junk food junky this pg-

        [ Reply | Options ]
        11.05.09, 02:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Stop walking by the candy and try to eat something healthy everytime you want it. I bring carrots to work and munch on those when major temptation hits. Or try to only allow chocolate after 3pm.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.05.09, 02:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • is it your first?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.05.09, 02:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • second- I care less about being healthy and weight gain this time- though I am up 19 pounds with 6 weeks to go, so not terrible, but I'd like to just gain 2-3 more pounds if possible-

            [ Reply | Options ]
            11.05.09, 02:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • wow, i am jealous. i gained 50 lbs with all dc's and normally very skinny/tiny. eat the chocolate -- enjoy -- you have nothing to worry about. and sees are the best!!

              [ Reply | Options ]
              11.05.09, 02:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • thanks, but started out this pg with 5 pounds left from last pg (from which I only gained 25 pounds so I might not gain a lot but then I don't lose a lot either) and started the first pg with 5 pounds of infertility weight. So I actually really need to limit the weight gain- normal BMI but I know myself and I was overweight to start-

                [ Reply | Options ]
                11.05.09, 02:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • np: I hear you. Trying to only gain 25 this time around. Gained 28 with the 1st and spent 2 hrs/day at the gym for 5 months before the weight came off.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  11.05.09, 02:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • OMG I LOVE SEE'S! That is my biggest weakness. That said, I have 35 lbs. to lose from eating during PG. I gave up sugar and it is an arduous process to lose all this weight.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          11.05.09, 02:49 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Can't help, but I'm right there with you.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.05.09, 02:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • nothing wrong with chocolate - enjoy. Simple pleasure while your pg. Unless your obese I guess

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.05.09, 02:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • help you eat the chocolate? love to!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.05.09, 02:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • ME TOO. I'm eating Nutella with a spoon. Not the best but I haven't gained that much weight so the calories are ok for me.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.05.09, 03:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'd like to help, but I just had chocolate rugalache for dinner...9 weeks pregnant.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.05.09, 05:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Enjoy it!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.05.09, 05:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • make sure you are taking your prenatals. chocolate craving can be a sign of low magnesium...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.05.09, 05:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • not pregnant and ate all of dc's chocolate out of her trick-or-treat stash. guilty as charged.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.06.09, 07:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • 24 weeks and am having the same "problem"!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      11.08.09, 11:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]

Your settings

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

UrbanBaby Asks...

Are you or your partner ever naked in front of your children?

Already voted? View Results

See previous polls »