advertisement
Click Here
On TV.com: EMMANUELLE CHRIQUI Photos
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]My grandfather passed away yesterday. I hadn't taken my 4mo son to meet him yet and am now really regretting it. Just venting, thanks.

    6 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    02.09.10, 06:58 AM [ Flag ]
    • so sorry to hear that. My grandmother died 10 days before my first baby was born. It's hard, but I hope you'll find some comfort in memories of him.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 07:00 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Thanks. I do have great memories of him just feel like my priorities are a bit mixed up that I couldn't even travel to see him. I spoke to him the day before he passed so am happy about that. So sorry about the timing of your grandmother's passing. It is hard.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 07:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • He knew (knows) that you love him. That is what is important.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.09.10, 07:05 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I am sorry for your loss. Write down your priorities. Since my mother has passed, I have prioritized DOING, so that I try to say yes to every invitation. Been on on some crazy trips, and become quite silly. Your not visiting made me think of this, since saying no to a visit feels easier with kids. His memory shouldn't end with his death. Join Geni.com and put up every photo of him you can, every memory, while its still fresh for your db. Visit his grave with db. They don't find this macabre at all. Good luck!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.09.10, 07:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • i'm so sorry. it might be nice to start a little journal for you to put down your memories of him. it'll help your children get a good feel for him when they are old enough to read it.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 07:06 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I LOVE geni.com. You can add videos, photos, of your dbs and your grandparents. It's the most wonderful website.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 07:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]please post your random financial or economic thought.

    12 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    02.09.10, 06:59 AM [ Flag ]
    • i keep reading about people who are underwater on their mortgages and/or not paying mortgage payments. why don't the banks start getting proactive and offering incentives instead of crying about the masses who aren't up to date on their mortgages?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 07:01 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • People are legally obligated to pay their mortgages. Do you think the banks should offer incentives on credit card debt?????

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 07:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • if all benefits like welfare and unemployment had work requirements, a lot more people would be off them. and i also think that you should be allowed to double up income with the benefits up to a certain amount, in order to stop the disincentive to work

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 07:05 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • we should have let the banks fail & the markets resolve themselves organically & gradually

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 07:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Agree - they should separate i-banks and regular banks again.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 07:14 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Yes and that makes us ancient and I feel,salvageable. Modern 'conveniences is a devastating oxymoron.I've also been turning the word 'amenities' over in my consciousness...Thoughts?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.09.10, 07:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • If you say let the banks fail you would have the entire world economy collapse.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 07:19 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • people who are underwater in their cars are absolutely ridiculous and deserve to have their cars taken away. people who take out a car loan that's in the 3-5 year range are ridiculous too. who wants to be in debt on a depreciating asset for 5 years?!? it's astounding!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 07:17 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Which Taxes would you raise, and which government programs would you end to balance the budget?

    92 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    02.08.10, 11:50 AM [ Flag ]
    • I would start by means testing Medicare and Social Security.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 11:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • what do you mean "means testing" SS and medicare? Do you mean that persons who have "too much money" in your random poinion would not qualify for benefits even though they paid into the system since forever?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 11:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • OP here. The point of the thread is to say what you would do, not criticise others' suggestions. What taxes would your raise and what programs would you cut?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.08.10, 12:00 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • People are going to criticize, that is called a discussion. Discussions are the primary object of message boards. If you want to hold some type of blind survey, well then there are places for that as well.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            02.09.10, 05:57 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • good one. That would be a meaningful savings

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 11:58 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • how would that be fair? they've paid in for what, then? to support you or me?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.08.10, 11:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • none of this is fair, but it's also not fair to leave our children saddled with 20 trillion in government debt

            [ Reply | Options ]
            02.08.10, 12:01 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • They didn't pay in to support Medicare costs like are now associated with the program. The average senior is getting thousands to tens of thousands of dollars in insurance premiums on top of their SS check.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            02.08.10, 12:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • and you would have them what? die without the help? WHAT is wrong with you?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              02.08.10, 12:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • no, she's saying the rich ones lose the benefit, and the poor ones keep the benefit. It's not a perfect solution, but if everyone's so upset about the deficit, we're going to have to think of some LARGE ideas to solve it, which means A. tax hikes and B. benefit cuts.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                02.08.10, 12:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • Yeah..ok..the day this government gets enough balls to take away from the haves what they provide to have nots, I'll see pigs flying by my window..Politicians will not write themselves out of benefits, even if they do not need them.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  02.08.10, 12:18 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • i didn't say "what's a politically feasible way to balance the budget" I said what would YOU do. What would you do?

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    02.08.10, 12:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • OR: I'm not saying that anyone loses anything. Just that if you are a senior citizen with significant disposable income, it is not unreasonable to ask you to help pay for your Medicare insurance. My grandmother traveled frequently until she was over 100 years old and left an 8 figure estate but the working poor paid for her health insurance for over 40 years. That is obscene.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  02.08.10, 12:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • If she was getting Medicare she was paying for her insurance...if she was that wealthy probably $350/mo...that's what Medicare part B costs

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    02.09.10, 07:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • ^^^"They didn't..." is OR

              [ Reply | Options ]
              02.08.10, 12:57 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I would too!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 01:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • as to programs, i would put an end to unnecessary wars which take up much of our budget. i would try to make a tax structure that was more transparent (flat and vat)

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 11:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • So you'd implement a regressive tax scheme?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 12:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Flat is not regressive. Flat is flat

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.08.10, 12:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • np: it's regressive in the sense that it would be disproportionately difficult for poorer people to pay their flat share

            [ Reply | Options ]
            02.08.10, 12:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • np: Flat is only not a regressive tax scheme if you do not know what a regressive tax scheme is or you don't understand a flat tax. (Well, or if you don't understand what a regressive tax scheme is AND you don't understand what a flat tax is.)

            [ Reply | Options ]
            02.08.10, 12:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • No salary cut-off on social security tax. Not sure if it would solve the problem completely but would certainly help. No reason that less affluent should pay larger percentage of their overall salary.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 11:55 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • take all those people off welfare and stop paying for illegal's children education and health benefits

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 11:59 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Ending welfare would save a lot of money. I think it would NOT save money to try to round up and send away illegal immigrants though, relative to the amount it costs to "educate" them.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 12:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • i did not say send them away, i said stop helping them out in a form of taking care of their kids, and they'll go away all on their own or will stop having those kids.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.08.10, 12:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • What "welfare" are you talking about exactly?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.08.10, 12:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • not OR, but probably WIC, food stamps, federal unemployment extenders, earned income tax credit, Pell Grants, federal housing, medicaid

            [ Reply | Options ]
            02.08.10, 12:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • welfare that generations of women get when they have multiple babies and refuse to work, welfare that healthy men get because they are somehow managing to screw the system claiming medical or mental disability, welfare that the new immigrant gets when they enter the country legally, but feel they could earn more if they went to school full time instead of working and earning their way...welfare that children get when their parents claim that the children are mentally incapable, whereas these kids are perfectly fine and attend regular schools until some of them get caught...welfare that people get when they own businesses, houses and cars in someone else's name so they can collect benefits...do you require more?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            02.08.10, 12:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • but what is the name of the program? There's no government benefit called "welfare"

              [ Reply | Options ]
              02.08.10, 12:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • oh, but it's so much easier to just slam people and call it all "welfare" than actually look at any complexities, gray areas, etc.! OR--for the most part you're talking about fraud, not about the programs themselves. I'm assuming that you don't really want to take away disability benefits for some single mom whose kid is on a ventilator?

                [ Reply | Options ]
                02.08.10, 12:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • of course not, but those are few and far in between. i would like to take it away from the kfc mom whoes butt is wider than the bus and who breeds a child a year just to keep the benefits coming.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  02.08.10, 12:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • um--didn't Clinton reform welfare? I don't know why all of a sudden all the anti-Obama folksa re talking about "welfare" except to raise the ghost of Reagan's black "welfare queens."

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    02.08.10, 04:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • Let me guess, you just went to see the movie Precious? Sweetie, that was a movie. There is very little basis in fact for MOST people receiving what you know as "welfare" these days. Most people on "welfare" are actually the working poor-they do have jobs but the jobs make so little that they qualify for cash assistance to supplement their income to a poverty level or food stamps or childcare benefits. One can be receiving food stamps yet not be receiving cash assistance. ALL people receiving cash assistance have a lifetime limit of 60 months(5 years). This is nationwide and has been in place since the early 1990s. Once they reach that limit they can recieve no more funds ever. They are not given any extra money for children born 10 months a...

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    02.09.10, 06:30 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • - after they are on welfare. The highest amount of cash assistance given tops out at around $1,500 and that is if you have over TEN dependents, even if you have more you will not get more. You try raising 10 kids on 1500 a month...in an urban area? Most recipients of cash assistance have only 3 children and recieve about $400 a month. YES $400 a month. Supplemental housing is hard to find and the waiting lists are 9-10 years long so these people are often paying fair market value for rent and other basic necessities. They make it by sharing living space or living in in horrific housing conditions. The mother will still be expected to work in order to keep recieving any benefits. Some of the money that she earns goes toward paying back the b...

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      02.09.10, 06:31 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • -- benefits she recieved back (about 10-30%). She of course pays taxes on her income. "Welfare" benefits can also be cut if the children do not go to school, if they are not immunized, and for a host of other reasons (including if the father is in the home which would explain the lower incidence of marriage in lower income homes-healthy men on welfare is not the norm-they barely want married couples to recieve welfare[hence the fathers who leave] let alone a single healthy man). When I say benefits-I mean all, many people on welfare no longer recieve cash but need food stamps or medical insurance or child care benefits in order to survive. The programs that allowed many people recieving benefits to finish school have often been cut at the s...

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        02.09.10, 06:32 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • --state level nationwide. This means that people, often women without GEDs, are stuck in low wage jobs. The school programs helped recipients recieve a GED and thereby limit the cycle of poverty. The welfare queen stereotypes are not based in truth, certainly not for the last 25 years! However this is a myth that has become cemented in the public consciousness thanks to a mixture of racial and class bias.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          02.09.10, 06:33 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • well, then i guess they are all getting paid from the blue magic fairy...i do not know what the current politically correct tems for the money they give these freeloading leeches, but sure enough there are plenty...in my time it was called "welfare" and "medicaid" and "disability", however, trust me there is a bunch of abuse in the system and most of these people are just sucking it dry under whatever name

                [ Reply | Options ]
                02.08.10, 12:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • The programs that you call welfare actually make up a tiny part of the budget. So you would be cutting programs that are vitally important to people with very little benefit. In 2007, TANF took up 0.63% of the federal budget.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.08.10, 12:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Worried about losing your nanny? Love the way you would end welfare but you don't want those illegal immigrants rounded up. After all, who would clean your home/take care of your kid then? The reason why America is still able to count itself among the affluent nations of the west(however we're losing ground all the time) is because it has some type of social service programs to care for its citizenry. We're still behind the times in comparison to most other western nations. Besides welfare only accounts for LESS than 1% of the government's spending. Let's talk about our extravagant defense fund (because the wealthy men who run our nation love to play war games) and leave our class biases out of it.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.09.10, 06:03 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I would eliminate the Department of Education, the Department of Energy and cut military spending by 50%. No new weapons programs for 15 years or so

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 12:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • u r my hero today

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 12:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I had a professor who advised Carter on creating the Department of Education. (Dept of Health and Human Services & Dept of Education used to be Department of Health, Education and Welfare.) He told Pres. Carter it was a bad idea and why. Carter then (his story went) said, "Thanks, I could not agree more. But I told the teacher's unions I would do it so..."

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 12:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • No more "stimulus" spending

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 12:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Eliminate the home mortgage deduction. Distorts consumption patterns for no good reason

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 12:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • nice!!! what's the matter? you are renting?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 12:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • np: Did you know that if you added up all government spending for low income housing (Fed+State+local) from the beginning of the New Deal to today -- it would equal less than the loss of income for one year from the home mortgage deduction? (Yet people still bemoan the welfare state for the working poor.)

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 12:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • now calculate the income loss on having a county go bankrupt from completely collapsing the economy.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.08.10, 02:38 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • np again: why?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            02.08.10, 02:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • because this is what will take place if your suggestion is implemented but much worse then now and with no hope for recovery in our lifetime. it could have been implemented before the bubble when rent/own balance was in place.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              02.08.10, 03:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • np again: I made no suggestion at all. I merely pointed out that while housing "welfare" for the working poor is an easy topic to rally the thickbrowed and get them to beat their chests, the truth is it is a tiny fraction of the cost to the government of a middle class housing program "everyone" agrees ought not be touched.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                02.09.10, 05:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • it makes housing affordable for a lot of people. not sure if that's something our tax money should go to.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 03:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • raise/create taxes for offshore labor. companies should not be rewarded for outsourcing by avoiding FICA match, health care benefits, 401K match etc...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 02:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • so destroy capitalism as we know it in other words. great solution.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 03:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • can you explain. since when is it a foundation of capitalism to tax companies for hiring citizens but not taxing them for outsourcing work to other countries? i really don't get how this has to do with capitalism.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.08.10, 06:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • get rid of welfare institute universal basic income, tax the piss out of gov contract awards (basically charge companies like haliburton, grumman, monsanto for the privilege of doing business with fed) and multinationals doing biz here

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 02:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Off topic but not really... The number one thing I would do if I were king of the US of A is enforce property rights. I don't care if it is handbags or software. I would cover it all. Our greatest competitive advantage in the coming generation is our innovation. That our creditors routinely steal our property is absurd!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 02:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITTA. I think all copyrights should be enforced not just USA once. It should not be ok to sell Italian or German designer's knockoffs made in China in the USA. This hurts US businesses because these knockoffs directly compete with USA products that are priced competitively to the EU items.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 02:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • They did a survey of an office of the state agency in China which is charged with enforcing property rights. Every computer there but one was using pirated Microsoft software. It's worse than the New Orleans PD in the bad old days.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.09.10, 05:55 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • excellent question. i think i'd make changes to welfare, unemployment and other income-based programs. i'd demand some sort of public service if you are collecting funds. i'd also do some increased trading taxes. corporations that buy or sell over x number of shares get a per share tax.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 02:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • What taxes would I RAISE? Seriously, we already give over almost half of our income. I'm all for cutting unnecessary programs in the hopes that our taxes could be somewhat reasonable.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 03:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I would get rid of the cap on FICA. I think it phases out at 90K or so.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 06:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'd slash Medicaid and Medicare. I'd make everyone pay some amount of taxes - right now 40% don't pay taxes or get a rebate from credits. When everyone has to pay something, all of a sudden there will be much more concern about fraud and waste.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 07:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • itttta

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.08.10, 08:00 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • That's stupid. The primary people on both forms of government sponsored insurance are people, specifically older people, on fixed incomes. Older/disabled people on fixed incomes are already expected to contribute a great deal to their medical care via hefty medicare premiums and co-pays. The people who commit heavy duty fraud are often sham medical supply companies that are prevalent in certain areas of the country like FL. Often the people that these supply companies bill medicare for don't even know the companies exist-the companies merely buy the ss#. The thieves would care little about taxation since they're operating under the radar anyway so you would end up penalizing the very people who are least able to pay while keeping it busines...

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 05:55 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Your 40% is factually incorrect. There are a lot of taxes that people pay other than just income tax. As a matter of fact, when you look at the lower life expectancy of the poor and the huge disproportionate amount they contribute to Social Security (as a % of income) -- then SS starts to look like wealth reallocation (especially from black men to the rest of the population.)

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 06:12 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I would aggressively pursue tax cheats.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 07:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I would forbid all government employees from unionizing.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 07:50 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITTTTTTTTTTAAAA. actually, I would outlaw unions altogether. they had a purpose 50 yrs ago. today, the biggest threat to our economy IMO.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 04:20 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Huge threat to the MTA. Bloomberg called them thugs for a good reason.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.09.10, 04:53 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I totally agree. 50 years ago it was for fair treatment. Now it is to hold you hostage until you meet all demands. And they hold all the cards because they can strike and it is the taxpayer that loses out, again.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          02.09.10, 05:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Raise tax on carried interest, capital gains, dividends. Raise payroll tax...no cutoff on wages. Raise income tax on high earners. Raise the AMT!!!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 04:52 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Raise income tax on high earners? Are you serious? We already pay almost 50%. That isn't good enough? Not to mention grad school loans.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        02.09.10, 05:56 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • UNIONS have ruined this country. They are nothing more than a legalized mob. They should be outlawed under RICO.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 06:42 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • For starters capital gains should be treated like ordinary income. And there either should not be a cap on Medicare contributions, or the percentage taxed on income for Medicare should be increased -- Medicare is the black hole we all need to watch out for.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 07:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]Nursery Furniture: what brand did you buy/how much did you spend on DC crib, dresser, armoire, etc? TIA

    13 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    02.08.10, 03:26 PM [ Flag ]
    • crib is Q Collection Junior (cost $1100), dresser we already owned and just put a changer on top, glider is from Monte Design (cost $1100).

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 04:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • IKEA crib, $89. elfa from the container store for closet, $200. old dresser from family, free. fancy crib bumper was originally $400 got it for $40 on sale. It looks great. HHI this year was over 1mil. YEAH BABY! I did buy a bugaboo (mostly with gift cards). thanks for letting me brag.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 05:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Bought the crib and a dresser (which also acted as changing table) used. Splurged on top of the line, new glider and ottamon, got the rug on sale. Recently bought a bunch of pull out drawers from Ikea. Got a crib bumper/sheet set on ebay for a fraction of the cost. Bugaboo we bought used, and that's the only thing I regret, kinda. It broke after 9 months and I had no recourse. But now I'm due with number 2, so I need a two seater anyway.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 05:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • crib: for now the Graco travel mini-crib $80; dresser: we owned; changing table: we bought a crib mattress and put it on top of an old table - it's bigger and more convenient than the teeny changing tables; cost $30; rocker/recliner from Babies R Us $350.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 05:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Pali crib $600, Ikea dresser $170.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 05:51 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Natart convertible crib, toddler rail, conversion to full bed kit, armoire, wide dresser. $3000.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 08:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • friend gave us crib, BIL gave us mattress, dresser was ours (built replacement for us), built armoire myself. so, zilcho.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 08:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Bellini crib was about $900, i think. changing table is a pad on top of existing dresser, serena and lily custom crib bedding was about $500+, glider and ottoman by dutalier at buy buy baby, i don't remember the cost. everything was a gift from my parents. everything has worked well and is being used by 2nd baby now.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.08.10, 08:50 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • bought e/t from a site called poshtots dot com. I think the crib was about 1200, armoire 800, changing table 500 or so. its an investment since I plan on having more than 1, so I wanted a beautiful nursery with durable furniture that will last.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 04:18 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Used crib that friend had given us from Bellini for for DC's since older moved to bed before arrival of #2. Bought them both "big boy" furniture sets so we didn't have to do it again later, headboard, dresser, one night stand each. One got a large bookcase the other a stand up dresser (since his closet is smaller). Spent about $2000 each, but don't need to replace as they get older should take them through their teens. Also got the Bugaboo which I love but wish it were easier to break down, and not in two pieces. HHI over 1mil as well.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 05:54 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Bjorn makes the best travel crib out there (300), can also be used as the playpen when at home. Crib & changer/dresser combo were both around $350 bought on amazon.com, made by DaVinci.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 06:16 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • DS. Antique armoire for $550 or so that will last. Put a changing pad on a dresser we already owned. I use the closet for his other stuff. Cheap crib. Will probably spend $5-600 on a big boy bed frame alter on.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      02.09.10, 07:11 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
refresh »

Your settings system defaults

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here